Literature DB >> 27860009

Evaluation of collection methods for Culex quinquefasciatus, Aedes aegypti, and Aedes simpsoni in northeastern Tanzania.

Jonathan Harold Thornton1, Bernard Malongo Batengana2, Alvaro Eduardo Eiras3, Seth Robert Irish4.   

Abstract

In East Africa, significant morbidity and mortality are caused by infections spread by Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti. Sticky traps have been shown to be effective tools for sampling populations of Aedes mosquitoes and have been found to catch Cx. quinquefasciatus. Thus, they could potentially be used to sample populations of this species. This study compared Sticky ovitraps (SO) and MosquiTraps (MQT) with the CDC Gravid trap (CDC-GT) for collection of Culex and Aedes mosquito populations in Tanzania. A follow-up experiment was carried out using traps set for a 24-h period to accommodate the oviposition habits of Aedes aegypti and Ae. simpsoni s.l. mosquitoes. The results showed that the CDC-GT caught significantly more Cx. quinquefasciatus and Ae. aegypti than the SO or MQT, but there was no significant difference in the number of mosquitoes caught between the two sticky traps or of Ae. simpsoni s.l. caught among the three trap types. The results suggest that CDC-GTs are the most appropriate in sampling of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Although CDC-GTs collected more Ae. aegypti than the sticky traps, the simplicity and cost benefit of sticky traps facilitates large scale studies. All three trap types should be considered for monitoring Aedes mosquitoes.
© 2016 The Society for Vector Ecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aedes aegypti; Aedes simpsoni; Culex quinquefasciatus; MosquiTrap; Tanzania; gravid trap

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27860009     DOI: 10.1111/jvec.12221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vector Ecol        ISSN: 1081-1710            Impact factor:   1.671


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mosquito Attractants.

Authors:  Laurent Dormont; Margaux Mulatier; David Carrasco; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Development of an urban molecular xenomonitoring system for lymphatic filariasis in the Recife Metropolitan Region, Brazil.

Authors:  Anita Ramesh; Mary Cameron; Kirstin Spence; Remy Hoek Spaans; Maria A V Melo-Santos; Marcelo H S Paiva; Duschinka R D Guedes; Rosangela M R Barbosa; Claudia M F Oliveira; André Sá; Claire L Jeffries; Priscila M S Castanha; Paula A S Oliveira; Thomas Walker; Neal Alexander; Cynthia Braga
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-10-16

3.  Double BR-OVT: a new trap model for collecting eggs and adult mosquitoes from Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes spp.

Authors:  Morgana do Nascimento Xavier; Marina Praxedes Rodrigues; Danielle Cristina Tenório Varjal de Melo; Eloína Maria de Mendonça Santos; Rosângela Maria Rodrigues Barbosa; Cláudia Maria Fontes de Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 1.846

4.  Improving the delivery and efficiency of fungus-impregnated cloths for control of adult Aedes aegypti using a synthetic attractive lure.

Authors:  Adriano R Paula; Leila E I Silva; Anderson Ribeiro; Tariq M Butt; Carlos P Silva; Richard I Samuels
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Molecular xenomonitoring as a post-MDA surveillance tool for global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: Field validation in an evaluation unit in India.

Authors:  Swaminathan Subramanian; Purushothaman Jambulingam; Kaliannagounder Krishnamoorthy; Neelavathi Sivagnaname; Candasamy Sadanandane; Venkatesan Vasuki; Chokkalingam Palaniswamy; Balakrishnan Vijayakumar; Adinarayanan Srividya; Hari Kishan K Raju
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-01-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.