Tae Jung Oh1, Soo Lim1, Kyoung Min Kim1, Jae Hoon Moon1, Sung Hee Choi1, Young Min Cho2, Kyong Soo Park2, HakChul Jang2, Nam H Cho3. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In Caucasians, plasma glucose concentration at 1 h during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may be a better predictor of future diabetes mellitus than the fasting or 2-h postload glucose concentration. We investigated whether the 1-h glucose concentration could be used to predict future diabetes mellitus in Asian ethnicity. MEASUREMENTS: A total of 5703 Koreans with normal glucose tolerance were enrolled from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Indices of insulin sensitivity and β-cell function estimated from standard 75-g OGTTs performed every 2 years for 12 years were used to identify whether the 1-h glucose concentration could predict future diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: The mean age and body mass index at baseline were 51·3 ± 8·7 years and 24·2 ± 3·0 kg/m2 , respectively. During the 12-year follow-up, 593 subjects (10·3%) developed diabetes mellitus. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for incident diabetes mellitus was higher for the 1-h postload glucose concentration than for the fasting or postload 2-h glucose concentration (0·74 vs 0·61 or 0·63). The cut-off value of ≥8·0 mmol/l identified incident diabetes mellitus with 70% sensitivity and 68% specificity. After adjusting for typical risk factors, subjects with a 1-h postload glucose concentration ≥8·0 mmol/l had lower β-cell function and a 2·84-fold increased risk of incident diabetes mellitus compared with their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based 12-year prospective cohort study, 1-h postload plasma glucose concentration was an independent predictor of future diabetes mellitus and 8·0 mmol/l was suggested as a cut-off value.
OBJECTIVE: In Caucasians, plasma glucose concentration at 1 h during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may be a better predictor of future diabetes mellitus than the fasting or 2-h postload glucose concentration. We investigated whether the 1-h glucose concentration could be used to predict future diabetes mellitus in Asian ethnicity. MEASUREMENTS: A total of 5703 Koreans with normal glucose tolerance were enrolled from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Indices of insulin sensitivity and β-cell function estimated from standard 75-g OGTTs performed every 2 years for 12 years were used to identify whether the 1-h glucose concentration could predict future diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: The mean age and body mass index at baseline were 51·3 ± 8·7 years and 24·2 ± 3·0 kg/m2 , respectively. During the 12-year follow-up, 593 subjects (10·3%) developed diabetes mellitus. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for incident diabetes mellitus was higher for the 1-h postload glucose concentration than for the fasting or postload 2-h glucose concentration (0·74 vs 0·61 or 0·63). The cut-off value of ≥8·0 mmol/l identified incident diabetes mellitus with 70% sensitivity and 68% specificity. After adjusting for typical risk factors, subjects with a 1-h postload glucose concentration ≥8·0 mmol/l had lower β-cell function and a 2·84-fold increased risk of incident diabetes mellitus compared with their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based 12-year prospective cohort study, 1-h postload plasma glucose concentration was an independent predictor of future diabetes mellitus and 8·0 mmol/l was suggested as a cut-off value.
Authors: Michael Bergman; Ram Jagannathan; Martin Buysschaert; Jose Luis Medina; Mary Ann Sevick; Karin Katz; Brenda Dorcely; Jesse Roth; Angela Chetrit; Rachel Dankner Journal: Endocrine Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Michael Bergman; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani; Ralph A DeFronzo; Melania Manco; Giorgio Sesti; Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; Antonio Ceriello; Mary Rhee; Lawrence S Phillips; Stephanie Chung; Celeste Cravalho; Ram Jagannathan; Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David Owens; Cristina Bianchi; Stefano Del Prato; Mariana P Monteiro; João Sérgio Neves; Jose Luiz Medina; Maria Paula Macedo; Rogério Tavares Ribeiro; João Filipe Raposo; Brenda Dorcely; Nouran Ibrahim; Martin Buysschaert Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Kyong Hye Joung; Sang Hyun Ju; Ji Min Kim; Sorim Choung; Jae Min Lee; Kang Seo Park; Hyun Jin Kim; Bon Jeong Ku Journal: Diabetes Metab J Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.376
Authors: Y Thewjitcharoen; A Elizabeth Jones; S Butadej; S Nakasatien; P Chotwanvirat; E Wanothayaroj; S Krittiyawong; T Himathongkam; T Himathongkam Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Karla A Temple; Rachel Leproult; Lisa Morselli; David A Ehrmann; Eve Van Cauter; Babak Mokhlesi Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 5.555