| Literature DB >> 27858745 |
Marine Cacheux1,2, Ariane Blum1,2, Muriel Sébastien1,2, Anne Sophie Wozny1,2,3, Julie Brocard1,2, Kamel Mamchaoui4, Vincent Mouly4, Nathalie Roux-Buisson1,2,3, John Rendu1,2,3, Nicole Monnier1,2,3, Renée Krivosic5, Paul Allen6, Arnaud Lacour7, Joël Lunardi1,2,3, Julien Fauré1,2,3, Isabelle Marty1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Central Core Disease (CCD) is a congenital myopathy often resulting from a mutation in RYR1 gene. Mutations in RyR1 can increase or decrease channel activity, or induce a reduction in the amount of protein. The consequences of a single mutation are sometimes multiple and the analysis of the functional effects is complex.Entities:
Keywords: Central Core Disease; Malignant Hyperthermia; Ryanodine receptor; calcium release
Year: 2015 PMID: 27858745 PMCID: PMC5240544 DOI: 10.3233/JND-150073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuromuscul Dis
Fig.1Case description. (A). Pedigree of the family. Circles represent females and squares males. Filled symbols indicate affected individuals. The proband is indicated by the black arrow. Segregation of alleles is indicated below each individual. MH = Malignant Hyperthermia; MHN = MH Negative; MHS = MH Susceptible. (B). Quantitative analysis of RyR1 expression (protein and mRNA) in the skeletal muscle of the proband (Individual III.3). Twenty μg muscle homogenate from control (CTRL, lane 1) or proband (Y4864H, lane 2) were loaded on a 4–15% polyacrylamide gel. The amount of RyR1 protein is expressed as the percentage of RyR1 present in the control muscle, which relative expression compared to myosin was set at 100% . The central bars graph presents RyR1 protein mean amount ± SEM from seven different Western blots. The bar graph on the right is the Q-RT-PCR analysis of levels of RyR1 mRNA expressed as a percentage of control (which relative expression compared to reference genes was set to 100%). The data are presented as mean ± SEM of 9–12 different amplifications. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, Student’s t-test. (C) Representative Western blot of different controls (C1-C4), non-affected women between 20 and 23 years.
Analysis of patients
| CK | IVCT data | ||
| Hal 2% | Caf 2 mM | ||
| III: 3 | 75 | 6N | 5N |
| II: 2 | 168 | 10N | 6N |
| II: 1 | 51 | <2N | <2N |
CK levels and IVCT data of the proband (III.3) and two individuals from the family (II.2 and II.1). CK = Creatine Kinase activity is expressed in international units per liter (IU/L; normal <205). IVCT = In Vitro Contracture Test. Hal = tension in Newton (N) at 2% halothane, the normal value being <2N. Caf = tension at 2 mM Caffeine, the normal value being <2N.
Fig.2Calcium release in immortalized patient cells. Calcium imaging performed on control CTRL cells (black circle), and on patient’s Y4864H cells (white circle) differentiated for 7 to 8 days before calcium imaging. (A) Fluorescence variation curves induced by membrane depolarization (KCl 140 mM) applied during 60 s (black bar) in the presence of 2 mM external calcium, presented as mean (symbols) ± SEM. (B) Fluorescence variation curves induced by application of 4-Chloro-m-Cresol (CmC) 500 μM during 60 s (black bar) in the presence of 2 mM external calcium, presented as mean (symbols) ± SEM. (C) Fluorescence variation curves induced by application of caffeine 40 mM plus thapsigargin 1 μM (Caf+Thapsigargin) during 60 s (black bar) in the presence of 2 mM external calcium, presented as mean (symbols) ± SEM. (D) Fluorescence variation curves induced by application of caffeine 40mM plus thapsigargin 1 μM in absence of extracellular calcium (Caf+Thapsigargin - Ca2+) during 60 s (black bar) in the presence of Cd2+ and La3 +, presented as mean (symbols) ± SEM. (E) The maximal amplitude of the peak for each curve is presented in the bar plots, with the number of myotubes analyzed in each bar. ****p<0.0001, Student’s t test comparisons between CTRL and Y4864H cells, for each stimulation. (F) The area under each curve (A.U.) has been calculated for each stimulation, in control myotubes (black bars) and Y4864H myotubes (white bars) and is presented as mean ± SEM of the number of myotubes indicated in each bar. Statistics: Student’s t-test of Y4864H myotubes compared to control myotubes ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, ns: non significant.
Fig.3Expression of RyR1 in heterozygous RyR1+/– mouse muscles. (A) Quantitative Western blot analysis of RyR1 expression in skeletal muscle homogenates from WT mice (WT) or from heterozygous RyR1+/– mice (He). (B) The relative amount of RyR1 at the protein level compared to myosin was set to 100% in WT mice. The amount of RyR1 in He mice is presented as mean ± SEM of 9 experiments performed in 3 different mice. ***p < 0.001 Student’s t-test between WT and He. (C) Q-RT-PCR analysis of levels of RyR1 mRNA expressed as a percentage of WT mice (which relative expression compared to GAPDH was set to 100%). The data are presented as mean ± SEM of 3 different mice. **p < 0.01 Student’s t-test between WT and He.
Fig.4Calcium release in mouse cells. Calcium imaging performed on WT satellites cells (black circle), on RyR1+/– heterozygous mouse cells (gray square) and on RyR1–/– KO mouse cells (white circle) differentiated for 2 to 3 days before calcium imaging. (A) Fluorescence variation curves induced by membrane depolarization (KCl 140 mM) applied during 40 s (black bar) in the presence of 2 mM external calcium, presented as mean (symbols) ± SEM. (B) Fluorescence variation curves induced by application of 4-Chloro-m-Cresol (CmC) 500 μM during 40 s (black bar) in the presence of 2 mM external calcium, presented as mean (symbols) ± SEM. (C) The maximal amplitude of the peak for each curve is presented in the bar plots, with the number of myotubes analyzed in each bar. ****p < 0.0001, Student’s t test followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison, compared to WT. (D) The area under each curve (A.U.) has been calculated for each stimulation, in WT myotubes (black bars), He myotubes (gray bars) and KO myotubes (white bars) and is presented as the mean ± SEM of the number of myotubes indicated in each bar. ****p < 0.0001, Student’s t test followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison, compared to WT.
Fig.5Localization of the mutation in the structure of the protein. The localization of the mutation presented in this study, p.Y4864H, as well as two close amino acids R4864 and I4898 both involved in CCD, are reported on the structure of RyR1 recently proposed from single particle electron cryomicroscopy [31, 32]. These amino acids are in the luminal loop between transmembrane helixes S5 and S6, which contain the pore helix (P-helix) involved inpore formation.