| Literature DB >> 27858729 |
Jane Newman1,2,3, Brook Galna2, Djordje G Jakovljevic3, Matthew G Bates1,2, Andrew M Schaefer1, Robert McFarland1,2, Douglass M Turnbull1,2, Michael I Trenell3, Robert W Taylor1,2, Lynn Rochester2, Gráinne S Gorman1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently there are no known cures and few effective treatments for mitochondrial disorders. It is also true there is a lack of knowledge about suitable clinician rated outcomes and how these change over time in this patient cohort.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 27858729 PMCID: PMC5271457 DOI: 10.3233/JND-140061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuromuscul Dis
Disease burden, activity levels, physiological capacity and functional capacity of patients and control subjects pre (n = 30) and post aerobic exercise (n = 20) intervention
| Domain | Variable | Controls | Controls | ||||
| Disease Severity | 16 ± 8 | 15 ± 8 | 0.539 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
| Activity level | 2097 ± 547 * | n/a | n/a | 2602 ± 480 | n/a | n/a | |
| 7819 ± 4859 | n/a | n/a | 10,094 ± 3841 | n/a | n/a | ||
| Physiological | 20.8 ± 5.8 ** | 24.8 ± 8.9 | 0.009 | 27.9 ± 6.6 | 30.4 ± 5.6 | 0.073 | |
| 13.0 ± 4.1 * | 16.5 ± 6.4 | 0.014 | 16.3 ± 4.6 | 18.7 ± 3.9 | 0.017 | ||
| 1.5 ± 0.4 ** | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 0.09 | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 0.002 | ||
|
| 9.4 ± 2.7 | 10.5 ± 3.1 | 0.025 | 11.2 ± 4.8 | 11.8 ± 1.8 | 0.205 | |
| 0.7 ± 0.4 * | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.859 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 0.283 | ||
| Functional | 11.3 ± 2.5 ** | 10.6 ± 4.5 | 0.631 | 7.2 ± 1.6 | 6.9 ± 1.5 | 0.832 | |
| 7.9 ± 1.5 ** | 7.6 ± 1.3 | 0.68 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 6.8 ± 0.6 | 0.221 | ||
| 7.4 ± 1.2 | 7.1 ± 1.3 | 0.842 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 0.796 | ||
| 486 ± 107 | 471 ± 68 | 0.63 | 513 ± 52 | 539 ± 54 | 0.051 |
a p value represents the within group comparison of paired before and follow up time points. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 for patients vs controls at equivalent baseline time points.
Fig.1Area under the curve plots for functional outcome measures and peak exercise capacity. Cut off chosen at the point of maximum accuracy. Peak VO2 (sensitivity 67% , specificity 83% , accuracy 78% (p = 0.009); sit to stand (sensitivity 94% , specificity 75% , accuracy 89% (p<0.001); timed up and go (sensitivity 72% , specificity 83% , accuracy 75% (p = 0.009); 10MWT(sensitivity 61% , specificity 92% , accuracy 72% (p = 0.057); 6MTW (sensitivity 100% , specificity 44% , accuracy 81% (p = 0.103).