BACKGROUND: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) may present with three main clinical variants, namely nonfluent agrammatic (nfaPPA), semantic (sPPA), and logopenic (lPPA) subtypes. Frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLD) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) are the most common etiologies. OBJECTIVE: To study the potential of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for identifying the underlying pathology in patients with PPA. METHODS: CSF levels of total tau protein (τT), amyloid-β peptide (Aβ42), and tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (τP - 181) were measured by double sandwich, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 43 patients with PPA, 26 patients with AD, and 17 healthy controls. RESULTS: All patients could be classified as compatible with the AD or non-AD biomarker profile, either with the three biomarkers (90.7%) or their ratios, especially the τP - 181/Aβ42 ratio (9.3%). An AD-compatible biomarker profile was present in 39.5% of all PPA patients, specifically 22.2%, 35.7%, and 75% of nfaPPA, sPPA, and lPPA, respectively. In PPA patients with a non-AD profile (presumably FTLD), two different clusters could be identified according to the τP - 181/τT ratio, possibly corresponding to the two major FTLD pathologies (tau and TDP-43). CONCLUSION: CSF biomarkers may be a valuable tool for the discrimination between PPA patients with AD and non-AD pathophysiology and possibly between FTLD patients with tau and TDP-43 pathology.
BACKGROUND:Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) may present with three main clinical variants, namely nonfluent agrammatic (nfaPPA), semantic (sPPA), and logopenic (lPPA) subtypes. Frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLD) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) are the most common etiologies. OBJECTIVE: To study the potential of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for identifying the underlying pathology in patients with PPA. METHODS: CSF levels of total tau protein (τT), amyloid-β peptide (Aβ42), and tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (τP - 181) were measured by double sandwich, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 43 patients with PPA, 26 patients with AD, and 17 healthy controls. RESULTS: All patients could be classified as compatible with the AD or non-AD biomarker profile, either with the three biomarkers (90.7%) or their ratios, especially the τP - 181/Aβ42 ratio (9.3%). An AD-compatible biomarker profile was present in 39.5% of all PPA patients, specifically 22.2%, 35.7%, and 75% of nfaPPA, sPPA, and lPPA, respectively. In PPA patients with a non-AD profile (presumably FTLD), two different clusters could be identified according to the τP - 181/τT ratio, possibly corresponding to the two major FTLD pathologies (tau and TDP-43). CONCLUSION: CSF biomarkers may be a valuable tool for the discrimination between PPA patients with AD and non-AD pathophysiology and possibly between FTLDpatients with tau and TDP-43 pathology.
Authors: V C Constantinides; G P Paraskevas; G Velonakis; P Toulas; E Stamboulis; E Kapaki Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Åsa Sandelius; Erik Portelius; Åsa Källén; Henrik Zetterberg; Uros Rot; Bob Olsson; Jon B Toledo; Leslie M Shaw; Virginia M Y Lee; David J Irwin; Murray Grossman; Daniel Weintraub; Alice Chen-Plotkin; David A Wolk; Leo McCluskey; Lauren Elman; Vesna Kostanjevecki; Manu Vandijck; Jennifer McBride; John Q Trojanowski; Kaj Blennow Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 21.566