Literature DB >> 27858703

Chronic liver disease: Quantitative MRI vs CEUS-based microperfusion.

M Haimerl, S Poelsterl, L P Beyer, I Wiesinger, C Nießen, C Stroszczynski, P Wiggermann, E-M Jung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of MRI-based T1 relaxometry with dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-based liver microcirculation for evaluation of liver function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 22 patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with T1 relaxometry and previous or consecutive CEUS examinations. A transverse 3D VIBE sequence with an inline T1 calculation was acquired and the reduction rate of T1 relaxation time (rrT1) was evaluated. For CEUS measurements (1-6 MHz), a bolus injection of 1.4 ml sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles were administered and both cine loops and single images from arterial phase up to late phase were stored.Quantification of time to peak (TTP), rise time (RT), Wash- In Area Under the Curve (WiAUC), mean transit time (mTTI), the wash- in rate (WiR) and Wash-in perfusion index (WIPI)) was performed using a novel quantification software (VueBoxTM). To compare quantification parameters, patients were classified in patients representing a healthy population (rrT1 > 50%, n = 8) and those representing patients with liver disease (rrT1 < 50%, n = 14).
RESULTS: Comparing perfusion parameters TTP, mTTI, and WiR were higher in patients without liver disease compared to patients with impaired liver function (p = 0.10-0.21). RT, WiAUC and WIPI were significantly lower in patients with impaired liver function (RT, 14.8±1.5 s; WiAUC, 17288±6179 a.u., WIPI, 1243±423) compared to patients without liver disease (RT, 21.2±2.6 s, p = 0.032; WiAUC, 71534±25600, p = 0.034; WIPI, 4286±1748, p = 0.04). In a simple linear regression model, none of the perfusion parameters correlated significantly with rrT1 (p = 0.08-0.63).
CONCLUSION: Within the framework of this study, CEUS-based perfusion parameters were not able to assess severity of liver disease, however, WiAUC, RT and WIPI were significant perfusion parameters to make a rough assessment of liver function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CEUS; Chronic liver disease; liver function; microcirculation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27858703     DOI: 10.3233/CH-168112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc        ISSN: 1386-0291            Impact factor:   2.375


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Clinical Applications for Super-resolution Ultrasound Localization Microscopy.

Authors:  Hui-Ming Yi; Matthew R Lowerison; Peng-Fei Song; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-15

2.  Prognostic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma on the background of liver cirrhosis via contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pathology.

Authors:  Yukai He; Fenghua Liu; Shaofeng Mou; Qingyan Li; Sikui Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Effect of iodinated contrast media on renal perfusion: A randomized comparison study in pigs using quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Philipp Lamby; Friedrich Jung; Stefanie Graf; Lotte Schellenberg; Johannes Falter; Natascha Platz-da-Silva; Stephan Schreml; Lukas Prantl; Ralf P Franke; Ernst M Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evaluation of two-point Dixon water-fat separation for liver specific contrast-enhanced assessment of liver maximum capacity.

Authors:  Michael Haimerl; Ute Probst; Stefanie Poelsterl; Claudia Fellner; Dominik Nickel; Kilian Weigand; Stefan M Brunner; Florian Zeman; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.