OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the predictors of health risk perception in smokers with or without schizophrenia. METHODS: The health risk subscale from the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire was dichotomized and used to measure health risk perception in smokers with (n = 67) and without schizophrenia (n = 100). A backward stepwise logistic regression was conducted using variables associated at the bivariate level to determine multivariate predictors. RESULTS: Overall, 62.5% of smokers without schizophrenia and 40.3% of smokers with schizophrenia completely recognize the health risks of smoking (p ≤ .01). Multivariate predictors for smokers without schizophrenia included: sex (Exp (B) = .3; p < .05), Smoking Consequences Questionnaire state enhancement (Exp (B) = .69; p < .01), and craving relief (Exp (B) = 1.8; p < .01). Among smokers with schizophrenia, predictors were education (Exp (B) = .7; p < .05), nicotine dependence (Exp (B) = .5; p < .01), motivation to quit (Exp (B) = 1.8; p < .01), and Smoking Consequences Questionnaire craving relief (Exp (B) = 1.8; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: There was overlap and differences between predictors in smokers with and without schizophrenia. Commonly used techniques for education on the health consequences of cigarettes may work in smokers with schizophrenia, but intervention efforts specifically tailored to smokers with schizophrenia might be more efficacious.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the predictors of health risk perception in smokers with or without schizophrenia. METHODS: The health risk subscale from the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire was dichotomized and used to measure health risk perception in smokers with (n = 67) and without schizophrenia (n = 100). A backward stepwise logistic regression was conducted using variables associated at the bivariate level to determine multivariate predictors. RESULTS: Overall, 62.5% of smokers without schizophrenia and 40.3% of smokers with schizophrenia completely recognize the health risks of smoking (p ≤ .01). Multivariate predictors for smokers without schizophrenia included: sex (Exp (B) = .3; p < .05), Smoking Consequences Questionnaire state enhancement (Exp (B) = .69; p < .01), and craving relief (Exp (B) = 1.8; p < .01). Among smokers with schizophrenia, predictors were education (Exp (B) = .7; p < .05), nicotine dependence (Exp (B) = .5; p < .01), motivation to quit (Exp (B) = 1.8; p < .01), and Smoking Consequences Questionnaire craving relief (Exp (B) = 1.8; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: There was overlap and differences between predictors in smokers with and without schizophrenia. Commonly used techniques for education on the health consequences of cigarettes may work in smokers with schizophrenia, but intervention efforts specifically tailored to smokers with schizophrenia might be more efficacious.
Entities:
Keywords:
Schizophrenia; cigarette smoking; health risks; perception
Authors: Deanna L Kelly; Heather G Raley; Suzanne Lo; Katherine Wright; Fang Liu; Robert P McMahon; Eric T Moolchan; Stephanie Feldman; Charles M Richardson; Heidi J Wehring; Stephen J Heishman Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Faith Dickerson; Catherine R Stallings; Andrea E Origoni; Crystal Vaughan; Sunil Khushalani; Jennifer Schroeder; Robert H Yolken Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: P V Asharani; Jue Hua Lau; Vanessa Ai Ling Seet; Fiona Devi; Peizhi Wang; Kumarasan Roystonn; Ying Ying Lee; Laxman Cetty; Wen Lin Teh; Swapna Verma; Yee Ming Mok; Siow Ann Chong; Mythily Subramaniam Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Teresa DeAtley; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Patricia A Cioe; Suzanne M Colby; Rachel N Cassidy; Melissa A Clark; Eric C Donny; Jennifer W Tidey Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 4.637