Literature DB >> 27858133

Female genital mutilation: the role of medical professional organizations.

Tony Bazi1.   

Abstract

Female genital mutilation (FGM) refers to alteration of the external genitalia of girls without medical benefit. It is estimated by United Nations agencies that 200 million living girls and women have been subjected to different forms of FGM worldwide. Despite the criminalization of the procedure in the vast majority of countries where it is practiced, the decline in the incidence of this ritual is far from satisfactory. Immediate and long-term ill effects are well documented. Most publications of relevance originate from countries outside the map of FGM. In addition, there are major gaps in research related to this issue, considering the magnitude of the problem. International medical organizations and societies should assume their responsibility by providing a platform to professionals engaged in the prevention and treatment of the consequences of FGM, especially those living in the communities where the practice is endemic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clitoridectomy; Female circumcision; Female genital alteration; Female genital mutilation; Infibulation; Ritual

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27858133     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3202-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  26 in total

Review 1.  Female genital cosmetic surgery: a review of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Cheryl B Iglesia; Ladin Yurteri-Kaplan; Red Alinsod
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Women's health care in low income countries.

Authors:  Patricia J Numann
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Female Genital Mutilation: A Literature Review of the Current Status of Legislation and Policies in 27 African Countries and Yemen.

Authors:  Jane Muthumbi; Joar Svanemyr; Elisa Scolaro; Marleen Temmerman; Lale Say
Journal:  Afr J Reprod Health       Date:  2015-09

4.  Female genital mutilation reversal: a general approach.

Authors:  Mallika Anand; Todd J Stanhope; John A Occhino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Female genital mutilation: have we made progress?

Authors:  N F Toubia; E H Sharief
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Prevention of obstetric urogenital fistulae: some thoughts on a daunting task.

Authors:  Andy M Norman; Michael Breen; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-12-09

7.  Sexual health of women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Montserrat Espuña Pons
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05

8.  The cultural context of gender, identity: female genital, excision and infibulation.

Authors:  Bilkis Vissandjée; Mireille Kantiébo; Alissa Levine; Radegonde N'Dejuru
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2003-02

Review 9.  Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rigmor C Berg; Vigdis Underland; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Atle Fretheim; Gunn E Vist
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Interventions for healthcare providers to improve treatment and prevention of female genital mutilation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Balfour; Jasmine Abdulcadir; Lale Say; Michelle J Hindin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  3 in total

1.  Female circumcision debate: A muslim surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  M Ihsan Karaman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

2.  Economic status, a salient motivator for medicalisation of FGM in sub-Saharan Africa: Myth or reality from 13 national demographic health surveys.

Authors:  Imran O Morhason-Bello; Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe; Yusuf Olushola Kareem; Oladosu A Ojengbede
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2020-05-20

3.  Estimating utility value for female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Cyrus Alinia; Bakhtiar Piroozi; Fariba Jahanbin; Hossein Safari; Amjad Mohamadi-Bolbanabad; Ali Kazemi-Karyani; Ghobad Moradi; Fariba Farhadifar; Mohammad Ebrahimi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.