Literature DB >> 27858107

Gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) as salvage chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified.

Fei Qi1, Mei Dong2, Xiaohui He1, Yexiong Li3, Weihu Wang3, Peng Liu1, Jianliang Yang1, Lin Gui1, Changgong Zhang1, Sheng Yang1, Shengyu Zhou1, Yuankai Shi1.   

Abstract

Standard therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) remain unclear. There are few large cohort studies specifically focused on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for PTCL-NOS. We retrospectively reviewed patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL-NOS who received salvage GDP (gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin) chemotherapy at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China, from May 2008 to August 2014. Twenty-five patients were enrolled and analyzed. The median number of cycles of GDP chemotherapy per patient was four (range, 2-8 cycles). Overall response rate was 64.0% (16/25) with five achieved complete remission or complete remission unconfirmed. After a median follow-up of 9 months, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival after relapse or progression (second-PFS) were 9.3 and 5.4 months. One-year PFS rate and 1-year OS rate were 27.4% and 43.9%, respectively. Median second-PFS was significantly longer in patients sensitive to GDP than the ones resistant to the treatment (10.3 vs. 2.8 months, p < .01). In addition, the low International Prognostic Index, low Prognostic Index for T cell lymphoma, or normal level of LDH in serum was associated with favorable prognosis. Grade 3/4 adverse effect was observed in 10 of 25 patients treated with GDP including neutropenia (8/25), thrombocytopenia (5/25), and anemia (4/25). Taken together, our study suggests that GDP is an effective and optional salvage regimen for relapsed or refractory PTCL-NOS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Gemcitabine; Peripheral T cell lymphomas—not otherwise specified

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27858107     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2877-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  3 in total

1.  T-cell lymphoma with abundant CD20 expression showing a good response to rituximab with gemcitabine, oxiplatin, and L-asparaginase (R-pGEMOX): A case report.

Authors:  Yajuan Shao; Chunmei Bai; Jian Sun; Xin Gao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  CHOP versus GEM-P in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (CHEMO-T): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.

Authors:  Mary Gleeson; Clare Peckitt; Ye Mong To; Laurice Edwards; Jacqueline Oates; Andrew Wotherspoon; Ayoma D Attygalle; Imene Zerizer; Bhupinder Sharma; Sue Chua; Ruwaida Begum; Ian Chau; Peter Johnson; Kirit M Ardeshna; Eliza A Hawkes; Marian P Macheta; Graham P Collins; John Radford; Adam Forbes; Alistair Hart; Silvia Montoto; Pamela McKay; Kim Benstead; Nicholas Morley; Nagesh Kalakonda; Yasmin Hasan; Deborah Turner; David Cunningham
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 18.959

3.  Outcomes of GDPT (gemcitabine, cisplatin, prednisone, thalidomide) versus CHOP in newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Sun; Ling Li; Xin Li; Lei Zhang; Xinhua Wang; Xiaorui Fu; Zhenchang Sun; Xudong Zhang; Zhaoming Li; Jingjing Wu; Hui Yu; Yu Chang; Jiaqin Yan; Xiaolong Wu; Zhiyuan Zhou; Feifei Nan; Li Tian; Mingzhi Zhang
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 8.168

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.