Literature DB >> 27858096

Identification of the Criteria for Decision Making of Cut-Away Peatland Reuse.

Kadi Padur1, Mati Ilomets2, Tõnis Põder2.   

Abstract

The total area of abandoned milled peatlands which need to be rehabilitated for sustainable land-use is nearly 10,000 ha in Estonia. According to the agreement between Estonia and the European Union, Estonia has to create suitable conditions for restoration of 2000 ha of abandoned cut-away peatlands by 2023. The decisions on rehabilitation of abandoned milled peatlands have so far relied on a limited knowledgebase with unestablished methodologies, thus the decision making process needs a significant improvement. This study aims to improve the methodology by identifying the criteria for optimal decision making to ensure sustainable land use planning after peat extraction. Therefore relevant environmental, social and economic restrictive and weighted comparison criteria, which assess reuse alternatives suitability for achieving the goal, is developed in cooperation with stakeholders. Restrictive criteria are arranged into a decision tree to help to determine the implementable reuse alternatives in various situations. Weighted comparison criteria are developed in cooperation with stakeholders to rank the reuse alternatives. The comparison criteria are organised hierarchically into a value tree. In the situation, where the selection of a suitable rehabilitation alternative for a specific milled peatland is going to be made, the weighted comparison criteria values need to be identified and the presented approach supports the optimal and transparent decision making. In addition to Estonian context the general results of the study could also be applied to a cut-away peatlands in other regions with need-based site-dependent modifications of criteria values and weights.

Keywords:  Criteria system; Decision making; Decision tree; Milled peatland; Peatland rehabilitation; Stakeholders

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27858096     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0797-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process.

Authors:  Gamini Herath
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Identification of quarries rehabilitation scenarios: a case study within the metropolitan area of Bari (Italy).

Authors:  Pasquale Dal Sasso; Maria Antonella Ottolino; Lucia Patrizia Caliandro
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications.

Authors:  I Linkov; F K Satterstrom; G Kiker; C Batchelor; T Bridges; E Ferguson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management.

Authors:  Mark S Reed; Anil Graves; Norman Dandy; Helena Posthumus; Klaus Hubacek; Joe Morris; Christina Prell; Claire H Quinn; Lindsay C Stringer
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 5.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends.

Authors:  Ivy B Huang; Jeffrey Keisler; Igor Linkov
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 7.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.