Paul B Laursen1. 1. High Performance Sport New Zealand Millennium Institute of Sport & Health 17 Antares Place , Mairangi Bay 0632, New Zealand paul.laursen@hpsnz.org.nz.
Like many of us, I love sport. I care deeply about athlete performance. It is my job to. That passion has enabled me to wear a number of hats in the arena. I've been an athlete (triathlon and cycling), a coach, a professor, and an applied sport scientist. Residing in this sometimes messy, often fun, middle-space, between research, theory and application, which do not always align, I've been able to make some observations, identify some problems, and foster some solutions. The topic of this editorial is a story about how I've assisted to bridge a small gap between science and practice, by mixing scientific understanding and ingenuity to alter athlete temperature.Last year I delivered two presentations in Paris on this topic, entitled: Keeping your cool: How fluid temperature affects thermal comfort and performance in the heat. My opening slide included the picture, shown as Figure 1. Here we have two of today's world-best triathletes, Andrea Hewitt and Rachel Klamer, racing in the Gold Coast World Series Race in Australia (April 2015). In this race, it was 28°Celsius, with high humidity. To me, this picture speaks volumes about what's really important when maximizing performance in hot environments.
Redrawn figures from Siegel et al., showing mean ±SD run time to exhaustion (left panel) and rectal temperature (right panel) response to running at aerobic threshold in 34°C (55% relative humidity) after drinking ice slushy (−1°C) versus cold fluid (4°C). Lines denote individual data (n = 10). Time to exhaustion was longer (*) after ice slushy compared to cold water ingestion (P = 0.001), and rectal temperature was lower (*) with ice slurry compared with cold water ingestion from the 20-min time point of drink ingestion until 30 min of exercise (P<0 .05). At exhaustion however, rectal temperature was greater (#) after ice slurry ingestion (P = 0.001).
Redrawn figures from Siegel et al., showing mean ±SD run time to exhaustion (left panel) and rectal temperature (right panel) response to running at aerobic threshold in 34°C (55% relative humidity) after drinking ice slushy (−1°C) versus cold fluid (4°C). Lines denote individual data (n = 10). Time to exhaustion was longer (*) after ice slushy compared to cold water ingestion (P = 0.001), and rectal temperature was lower (*) with ice slurry compared with cold water ingestion from the 20-min time point of drink ingestion until 30 min of exercise (P<0 .05). At exhaustion however, rectal temperature was greater (#) after ice slurry ingestion (P = 0.001).The second most interesting finding for me was the consistent elevation of core (rectal) temperature above the control condition. The data was flying in the face of the critical core temperature hypothesis; that is, we all have this set point of temperature that we can reach, but it doesn't go any higher. So why was ice slushy ingestion allowing rectal temperature to get higher? Simply due to the proximity of where it was being measured – rectally – it suggested to us that it is more likely that brain temperature, or the brain's interpretation of body temperature, that is paramount when performance matters in the heat. Meanwhile, another group replicated our finding in field conditions in the Singapore heat.Fast forward to 2010. Working for the sport of Triathlon at High Performance Sport New Zealand, I pondered the concept that perhaps precooling with ice slushy might improve run performance in hot conditions. Before I even had the chance to test this myself, Chris Stevens, a triathlete and sport scientist from Australia, proved the concept and showed improved run times in the heat following ice slushy ingestion during the cycle phase of a simulated Olympic distance triathlon. Problem was, while Stevens et al. nicely proved the concept in the lab, application in the field wasn't as easy. Existing bottles did not contain spouts that allowed the flow of ice slushy to the user. A solution was needed, and was achieved through a 4th year engineering student program out of the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, NZ. Here, a group of engineering students took on the problem and came up with an elegant solution (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.
Prototype bottle developed by the 4th year Engineering students at the University of Canterbury. Pictures owned by the author.
Prototype bottle developed by the 4th year Engineering students at the University of Canterbury. Pictures owned by the author.Once the concept was proven, we tested the bottles with a group of elite triathletes. While they enjoyed the ice slushy on hot days, the reality was that the bottle was cumbersome and it leaked. A commercial solution was clearly needed. This was achieved by transferring the intellectual property out of High Performance Sport New Zealand into Teknicool Limited, a New Zealand corporation, that created a product for commercial sale (Fig. 4). High performance athletes and teams around the world can now access and use the invention.
Authors: Marc J Quod; David T Martin; Paul B Laursen; Andrew S Gardner; Shona L Halson; Frank E Marino; Margaret P Tate; David E Mainwaring; Christopher J Gore; Allan G Hahn Journal: J Sports Sci Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Rodney Siegel; Joseph Maté; Matt B Brearley; Greig Watson; Kazunori Nosaka; Paul B Laursen Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Christopher John Stevens; Ben Dascombe; Andriy Boyko; Dean Sculley; Robin Callister Journal: J Sports Sci Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 3.337