| Literature DB >> 27857535 |
Hyoung-Joo Ham1, Geun-Ho Kang2, Yun-Sang Choi3, Tae-Jun Jeong4, Ko-Eun Hwang4, Cheon-Jei Kim4.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of Gaeddongssuk powder (GP) on quality characteristics and shelf stability of emulsion sausages during storage. Proximate composition properties showed no significant differences in all treatment (p>0.05). Control showed the highest cooking loss while the treatment with GP showed decreased cooking loss depending on increasing GP content (p<0.05). Apparent viscosity of batter was increased as the amount of GP increased, whereas hardness of emulsion sausages was decreased with increasing GP level. In sensory evaluation, emulsion sausage with 0.1% GP resulted in the highest score in overall acceptability. The pH values of all treatments decreased at the early storage stage, followed by gradual increase. The lightness and redness of treatments were decreased when the level of GP was increased. However, the yellowness of sausages with GP were higher than that of control (p<0.05). The addition of GP inhibited lipid oxidation of emulsion sausages during storage depending on its level. The aerobic bacteria population and VBN was unaffected by addition of GP during the storage (p>0.05). Therefore, Gaeddongssuk powder up to 0.1% has a potential as a natural antioxidant for meat products because it can inhibit lipid oxidation of sausages without decreasing their sensory properties.Entities:
Keywords: Gaeddongssuk (Artemisia annua L.); emulsion sausage; quality characteristics; shelf stability
Year: 2016 PMID: 27857535 PMCID: PMC5112422 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.5.601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Fig. 1.Manufacturing procedure of emulsion sausage.
Comparison on proximate composition of emulsion sausages with different levels of GP
| Traits | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
| Moisture (%) | 59.42±0.07 | 59.14±0.06 | 58.95±0.12 | 59.52±0.06 | 59.53±0.13 |
| Fat (%) | 16.77±0.10 | 17.05±0.30 | 17.13±0.40 | 16.84±0.80 | 17.03±0.05 |
| Protein (%) | 17.16±0.08 | 17.06±0.02 | 17.02±0.10 | 17.18±0.06 | 17.15±0.11 |
All values are mean±standard deviation.
1)Treatments: Control, no added ingredient; T1, sausage with 0.02% BHT(butylated hydroxytoluene); T2, sausage with 0.1% Gaeddongssuk powder; T3, sausage with 0.3% Gaeddongssuk powder; T4, sausage with 0.5% Gaeddongssuk powder.
Comparison cooking loss on emulsion sausages with different GP levels
| Traits | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
| Cooking loss (%) | 1.31±0.25A | 1.14±0.15AB | 1.12±0.14AB | 0.84±0.52AB | 0.75±0.17B |
All values are mean±standard deviation.
1)Treatments: Control, no added ingredient; T1, sausage with 0.02% BHT(butylated hydroxytoluene); T2, sausage with 0.1% Gaeddongssuk powder; T3, sausage with 0.3% Gaeddongssuk powder; T4, sausage with 0.5% Gaeddongssuk powder.
A,BMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Fig. 2.Comparison of apparent viscosity on emulsion sausage with different levels of GP.
Comparison on texture properties of emulsion sausages with different levels of GP
| Traits | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
| Hardness (kg) | 1.04±0.10A | 1.06±0.08A | 1.05±0.08A | 0.92±0.06B | 0.86±0.04C |
| Springiness (mm) | 18.41±1.24A | 17.00±0.71B | 17.72±0.30AB | 17.61±0.29B | 17.15±0.71B |
| Cohesiveness | 1.42±0.55 | 1.26±0.72 | 1.25±0.78 | 1.59±0.68 | 1.54±0.64 |
| Gumminess (kg) | 1.47±0.53 | 1.36±0.79 | 1.35±0.86 | 1.49±0.62 | 1.33±0.56 |
| Chewiness (kg*mm) | 26.80±0.91 | 23.21±3.70 | 23.83±5.17 | 26.42±0.97 | 22.91±0.84 |
All values are mean±standard deviation.
1)Treatments: Control, no added ingredient; T1, sausage with 0.02% BHT(butylated hydroxytoluene); T2, sausage with 0.1% Gaeddongssuk powder; T3, sausage with 0.3% Gaeddongssuk powder; T4, sausage with 0.5% Gaeddongssuk powder.
A-CMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Sensory evaluation of emulsion sausages with different levels of GP
| Traits2) | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
| Color | 4.43±1.39C | 4.57±0.97C | 5.86±1.06B | 7.43±0.78A | 8.29±0.75A |
| 1.29±0.48C | 1.14±0.37C | 4.71±1.70B | 6.43±1.51A | 7.43±1.13A | |
| Flavor | 5.57±1.71 | 5.29±1.70 | 4.71±1.89 | 4.00±1.91 | 3.71±1.89 |
| Texture | 4.86±1.77 | 4.57±1.61 | 4.86±1.06 | 5.14±1.34 | 5.14±1.57 |
| Overall acceptability | 6.14±1.06AB | 6.14±069AB | 6.29±1.25A | 5.00±1.15BC | 4.71±1.49C |
All values are mean±standard deviation.
1)Treatments: Control, no added ingredient; T1, sausage with 0.02% BHT(butylated hydroxytoluene); T2, sausage with 0.1% Gaeddongssuk powder; T3, sausage with 0.3% Gaeddongssuk powder; T4, sausage with 0.5% Gaeddongssuk powder.
2)Traits: color (1=extremely undesirable, 9=extremely desirable), Gaeddongssuk flavor (1=extremely undesirable, 9=extremely desirable), flavor (1=extremely undesirable, 10=extremely desirable), texture (1=extremely undesirable, 9=extremely desirable), and overall acceptability (1=extremely undesirable, 9=extremely desirable)
A-CMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Change in pH values of emulsion sausages with different levels of GP during refrigerated storage time
| Storage time (wk) | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
| 1 | 6.78±0.01ABa | 6.77±0.01Cb | 6.79±0.01Ba | 6.81±0.01Aa | 6.82±0.01Aa |
| 2 | 6.78±0.01ABa | 6.77±0.01Cb | 6.79±0.01Ba | 6.81±0.01Aa | 6.81±0.01Aa |
| 3 | 6.66±0.01Bb | 6.65±0.02Bc | 6.65±0.02Bb | 6.70±0.01Ab | 6.71±0.01Ab |
| 4 | 6.62±0.01Cc | 6.65±0.01Bc | 6.66±0.02Bb | 6.71±0.01Ab | 6.70±0.01Ac |
All values are mean±standard deviation.
1)Treatments: Control, no added ingredient; T1, sausage with 0.02% BHT(butylated hydroxytoluene); T2, sausage with 0.1% Gaeddongssuk powder; T3, sausage with 0.3% Gaeddongssuk powder; T4, sausage with 0.5% Gaeddongssuk powder.
A-CMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
a-cMeans within a column with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Change in color values of emulsion sausages with different levels of GP during refrigerated storage time
| Traits | Storage time (wk) | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | ||
| CIE L*(Lightness) | 1 | 82.90±0.85Ab | 83.23±0.88Ab | 80.94±0.78Bc | 77.06±0.59Cc | 73.04±0.59Dc |
| 2 | 83.94±0.82ABa | 84.43±0.58Aa | 82.27±0.53Cb | 78.36±0.80Db | 75.65±0.61Ea | |
| 3 | 83.64±0.57Aa | 80.75±1.21Bc | 84.01±0.70Aa | 77.13±1.00Ca | 74.16±0.84Db | |
| 4 | 83.50±0.62Aab | 84.17±0.47Aa | 80.68±0.57Bc | 76.50±0.96Ca | 74.60±1.39Db | |
| CIE a*(Redness) | 1 | 6.21±0.37Aa | 6.17±0.22Abc | 3.57±0.26Bab | 0.66±0.29Ca | −1.42±0.27Da |
| 2 | 6.22±0.16Aa | 6.32±0.09Ab | 3.80±0.37Bab | 0.82±0.44Ca | −1.40±0.06Da | |
| 3 | 6.35±0.38Aa | 6.11±0.21Ad | 3.58±0.21Bab | 0.75±0.57Ca | −1.46±0.14Da | |
| 4 | 6.51±0.21Aa | 6.56±0.21Aa | 3.29±0.22Bb | 0.55±0.15Cab | −1.24±0.13Da | |
| CIE b*(Yellowness) | 1 | 14.75±0.45Db | 14.57±0.47Db | 15.45±0.49Ca | 16.10±0.28Bc | 16.99±0.26Ac |
| 2 | 14.68±0.36Db | 14.38±0.45Db | 15.64±0.46Ca | 16.97±0.17Ba | 18.18±0.33Aa | |
| 3 | 15.14±0.46Da | 15.59±0.41Ca | 14.80±0.44Db | 16.48±0.61Bb | 17.37±0.23Ab | |
| 4 | 14.41±0.24Db | 14.39±0.51Db | 15.77±0.59Ca | 17.04±0.34Ba | 18.34±0.48Aa | |
All values are mean±standard deviation.
1)Treatments: Control, no added ingredient; T1, sausage with 0.02% BHT(butylated hydroxytoluene); T2, sausage with 0.1% Gaeddongssuk powder; T3, sausage with 0.3% Gaeddongssuk powder; T4, sausage with 0.5% Gaeddongssuk powder.
A-EMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<.05).
a-dMeans within a column with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Fig. 4.Changes in TBARS on emulsion sausages containing different levels of GP during storage time.
Change in VBN values of emulsion sausages with different levels of GP during refrigerated storage time
| Storage time (wk) | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
| 1 | 11.62±0.16Dc | 12.81±0.32Cc | 13.09±0.41BBc | 13.82±0.16Bc | 14.65±0.31Ac |
| 2 | 12.62±0.47Cc | 12.08±0.72Cc | 13.54±0.16Bc | 14.09±0.16Bc | 16.02±0.31Ab |
| 3 | 14.55±0.28Bb | 15.01±0.79Bb | 15.92±0.27Ab | 16.29±0.15Ab | 16.38±0.15Ab |
| 4 | 18.21±0.73ABa | 16.29±1.19Ca | 17.94±0.99Ba | 18.12±0.16ABa | 19.49±0.16Aa |
All values are mean±standard deviation.
1)Treatments: Control, no added ingredient; T1, sausage with 0.02% BHT(butylated hydroxytoluene); T2, sausage with 0.1% Gaeddongssuk powder; T3, sausage with 0.3% Gaeddongssuk powder; T4, sausage with 0.5% Gaeddongssuk powder.
A-DMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
a-cMeans within a column with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Fig. 5.Effect of GP on the population of aerobic bacteria of emulsion sausages during refrigerated storage (Log CFU/g).
The formulation of emulsion sausages with different levels of GP
| Ingredients | Treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
| Pork meat | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Chicken meat | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Corn starch | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Soy protein | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Pork fat | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| Ice | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Phosphate | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Salt | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Sugar | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| BHT1) | 0.02 | ||||
| 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |||
1)BHT: Butylated hydroxytoluene.