Literature DB >> 27857494

Osteofascial compartment pressure measurement in closed limb injuries - Whitesides' technique revisited.

Rajendra Kumar Beniwal1, Abhishek Bansal2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Regular monitoring of tissue compartmental pressures and hence a timely intervention in patients with impending compartment syndrome has been shown to prevent morbidity and permanent disability.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intra-compartmental pressure in flexor compartment of forearm and various compartments of legs following recent trauma presenting within 6 h of injury was carried out in 30 subjects using Whitesides' technique and patients were classified into 3 categories for treatment purposes i.e., Category I: pressure <30 mmHg, Category II: pressure 30-40 mmHg and Category III: pressure >40 mmHg.
RESULTS: Category I had 17 subjects, Category II had 6 subjects whereas 7 subjects fell into Category III. 6 patients out of the 30 studied needed fasciotomy, out of which 5 had fair or good result.
CONCLUSION: Whitesides' technique, though not much widely favoured, is a safe, inexpensive, easily assembled and reliable method for measurement of intra-compartmental pressure as a guide for decompression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed fracture in limbs; Compartment pressure; Compartment syndrome; Fasciotomy; Whitesides’ technique

Year:  2016        PMID: 27857494      PMCID: PMC5106467          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  15 in total

1.  Tissue pressure measurements as a determinant for the need of fasciotomy.

Authors:  T E Whitesides; T C Haney; K Morimoto; H Harada
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Treatment of compartment syndrome in children.

Authors:  R B Willis; C H Rorabeck
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 3.  Vascular trauma and compartment syndromes.

Authors:  George C Velmahos; Konstantinos G Toutouzas
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Acute compartment syndrome in tibial diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  M M McQueen; J Christie; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-01

5.  Compartment syndromes of the forearm: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; S R Garfin; P T Hergenroeder; S J Mubarak; J Menon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Compartment syndrome in open tibial fractures.

Authors:  S S Blick; R J Brumback; A Poka; A R Burgess; N A Ebraheim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Acute compartment syndrome in forearm fractures.

Authors:  L A Broström; A Stark; G Svartengren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-02

8.  Acute compartment syndrome of the thigh. A spectrum of injury.

Authors:  J T Schwartz; R J Brumback; R Lakatos; A Poka; G H Bathon; A R Burgess
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Diagnosis and management of compartmental syndromes.

Authors:  F A Matsen; R A Winquist; R B Krugmire
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Compartment pressure in association with closed tibial fractures. The relationship between tissue pressure, compartment, and the distance from the site of the fracture.

Authors:  M M Heckman; T E Whitesides; S R Grewe; M D Rooks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

1.  A case of rhabdomyolysis with compartment syndrome in the right upper extremity.

Authors:  Peng-Chao Guo; Guang-Feng Zhao; Hui-Ming Zhong
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2020

Review 2.  Diagnosing acute compartment syndrome-where have we got to?

Authors:  Tristan E McMillan; William Timothy Gardner; Andrew H Schmidt; Alan J Johnstone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.