| Literature DB >> 27857487 |
Mafalda Mota1, Fernando T Vaz2, Mário Ramalho2, Catarina Pedrosa1, Maria Lisboa2, Paulo Kaku2, Florindo Esperancinha2.
Abstract
AIM: To determine the relationship between macular thickness (MT) and visual field (VF) parameters, as well as with changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OH).Entities:
Keywords: Glaucoma; Macula; Optical coherence tomography; RNFL; Visual field.
Year: 2016 PMID: 27857487 PMCID: PMC5104967 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Curr Glaucoma Pract ISSN: 0974-0333
Table 1: Demographic data
| Female | 28 (40%) | ||
| Male | 42 (60%) | ||
| Glaucoma and congenital cataract | 2 (2.68%) | ||
| Juvenil glaucoma | 8 (11.43%) | ||
| Uveitic glaucoma | 1 (1.43%) | ||
| Open angle primary glaucoma | 26 (37.14%) | ||
| Close angle primary glaucoma | 5 (7.14%) | ||
| Normotensional glaucoma | 6 (8.57%) | ||
| Pseudo-exfoliative glaucoma | 14 (20%) | ||
| Ocular hypertension | 6 (8.57%) | ||
| Pigmentary glaucoma | 2 (2.68%) |
Fig. 1Example obtained through the analysis of SCP and SD-OCT, using the RNFL and p. pole software, in the right eye of a patient with glaucoma. In VF a tubular defect is observed. There is an overall thinning of the RNFL except in inferior-nasal quadrant, which is borderline. In the evaluation by p. pole program (below) we see the asymmetry between superior and inferior macula, which is consistent with the VF obtained from the SCP
Table 2: Median values obtained by OCT and SCP
| Total MT | 70 | 273 | 219 | 319 | |||||
| <270 μm | 29 | 259 | 219 | 269 | |||||
| 270-300 μm | 34 | 278.5 | 270 | 299 | |||||
| Superior MT | 70 | 272 | 213 | 321 | |||||
| <270 μm | 29 | 262 | 213 | 284 | |||||
| 270-300 μm | 34 | 279 | 263 | 300 | |||||
| Inferior MT | 70 | 272 | 224 | 317 | |||||
| <270 μm | 29 | 259 | 224 | 276 | |||||
| 270-300 μm | 34 | 281 | 265 | 302 | |||||
| Asymmetry | 70 | 6 | 0 | 33 | |||||
| <270 μm | 29 | 5 | 1 | 33 | |||||
| 270-300 μm | 34 | 7 | 0 | 24 | |||||
| ST RNFL | 70 | 94 | 32 | 177 | |||||
| <270 μm | 29 | 66 | 32 | 177 | |||||
| 270-300 μm | 34 | 98 | 43 | 163 | |||||
| IT RNFL | 70 | 94 | 27 | 173 | |||||
| <270 μm | 29 | 61 | 27 | 140 | |||||
| 270-300 μm | 34 | 107 | 34 | 173 | |||||
| MD | 70 | 3.3 | –3.6 | 23.7 | |||||
| <270 μm | 29 | 6.7 | –0.9 | 23.7 | |||||
| 270-300 μm | 34 | 2.05 | –3.6 | 19.2 | |||||
| LV | 70 | 16.95 | 1.4 | 166.1 | |||||
| <270 μm | 29 | 31.4 | 1.4 | 120.9 | |||||
| 270-300 μm | 34 | 10.6 | 1.6 | 89.2 |
Legend: OCT: Optical coherence tomography; SCP: Static perimetry computed; MT: Macular thickness; ST: Supero-temporal; RNFL: Retinal nerve fiber layer; IT: Infero-temporal; MD: Mean defect; LV: Loss variance
Graphs 1A and BCorrelation between TMT and MD (top) and between the TMT and LV (below)
Graph 2Correlation between LV and MA in the subgroup with EMT < 270 μm
Graphs 3A and BCorrelation between superior MT and the thickness and the superiotemporal PNFL, in the top, and between inferior MT and the thickness of inferiotemporal PNFL, below