| Literature DB >> 27857210 |
Jonathan P Ritson1,2,3, Michael Bell3, Richard E Brazier4, Emilie Grand-Clement4, Nigel J D Graham2, Chris Freeman5, David Smith6, Michael R Templeton2, Joanna M Clark3.
Abstract
Peatland ecosystem services include drinking water provision, flood mitigation, habitat provision and carbon sequestration. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal is a key treatment process for the supply of potable water downstream from peat-dominated catchments. A transition from peat-forming Sphagnum moss to vascular plants has been observed in peatlands degraded by (a) land management, (b) atmospheric deposition and (c) climate change. Here within we show that the presence of vascular plants with higher annual above-ground biomass production leads to a seasonal addition of labile plant material into the peatland ecosystem as litter recalcitrance is lower. The net effect will be a smaller litter carbon pool due to higher rates of decomposition, and a greater seasonal pattern of DOC flux. Conventional water treatment involving coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation may be impeded by vascular plant-derived DOC. It has been shown that vascular plant-derived DOC is more difficult to remove via these methods than DOC derived from Sphagnum, whilst also being less susceptible to microbial mineralisation before reaching the treatment works. These results provide evidence that practices aimed at re-establishing Sphagnum moss on degraded peatlands could reduce costs and improve efficacy at water treatment works, offering an alternative to 'end-of-pipe' solutions through management of ecosystem service provision.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27857210 PMCID: PMC5114669 DOI: 10.1038/srep36751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1DOC removal by coagulation for different peatland sources.
Error bars at one standard error (n = 3).
Figure 2% loss of DOC on seven day incubation with added nutrients and standardised inoculum for different DOC sources.
Error bars at one standard error (n = 5).
Figure 3DOC production from different peatland sources (letters indicate statistical subsets).
Error bars at one standard error (n = 5).
Literature estimates of amount and seasonality of litter production for the species of interest.
| Vegetation | Litter production (g m−2 year −1) | Timing | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35–156 | Year-round | ||
| 40–261 | Year-round, peaks in autumn/winter | ||
| 690–800 | Sept–Nov | ||
| 536–633 | Sept–Nov |
Figure 4Conceptual diagram showing changes to size, speed of cycling and seasonality of litter carbon pool on transition from Sphagnum to Molina domination of uplands.