| Literature DB >> 27857187 |
Zhongyu Sun1,2, Jun Wang2, Hai Ren2, Qinfeng Guo3, Junwu Shu4, Nan Liu2.
Abstract
Long-term ecological data play a vital role in ecological conservation and restoration, however, using information from local forest soil pollen data to assist restoration remains a challenge. This study analyzed two data sets, including 1) surface soil pollen (0-5 cm) and current vegetation data from four near-natural communities and four plantations, and 2) fossil pollen from soil profiles (0-80 cm) from a regional climax community and a degraded land. The pollen representativeness and similarity indexes were calculated. The results showed a low similarity between soil pollen and current vegetation (about 20%) thus forest soil pollen data should be used with caution when defining reference ecosystems. Pollen from Gironniera and Rutaceae which were abundant in broadleaved forest, were also detected in the 40-80 cm layer of a soil profile from the degraded land, which indicates its restoration possibility. Our study considered that the early restoration stage of the study area may benefit from using plant taxa of Pinus, Poaceae, Lonicera, Casuarina, Trema and Quercus. As Pinus, Castanopsis, Gironniera, Rutaceae, Helicia, Randia, Poaceae, Dicranopteris and Pteris always existed during succession, for regional forest restoration under global climate change, the roles of such "stable species" should be considered.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27857187 PMCID: PMC5114570 DOI: 10.1038/srep37188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The characteristics of pollen in the surface soils in forest communities in subtropical China.
| Site | Common pollen (%) | Dominant pollen (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tree | Herb | Fern | ||
| D-C | — | Poaceae (30.3) | ||
| D-Z | Poaceae (14.2) | |||
| D-H | Poaceae (10.2) | |||
| D-J | Poaceae (0.6) | |||
| H-Z | Poaceae (34.9) | |||
| H-X | Poaceae (29.6) | |||
| H-A | Poaceae (8.9) | |||
| H-D | Poaceae (14.7) | |||
Note: CF = coniferous forest; MF = pine and broadleaved mixed forest; BF = broadleaved forest; CP = coniferous plantation; BP = broadleaved plantation; EP = eucalyptus plantation; LP = legume plantation. Percentages are relative to the total tree and herb pollen in each sample, and the percentage showed in the table is the average value.
Figure 1Surface soil pollen diagram in natural communities CF, MF, and BF at the Dinghushan Natural Reserve in South China.
Note: BF = broadleaved forest; MF = pine and broadleaved mixed forest; CF = coniferous forest. The Y axis on the left indicates the sample number.
Figure 2Surface soil pollen diagram in plantations in South China.
Note: LP = legume plantation; EP = eucalyptus plantation; BP = broadleaved plantation; CP = coniferous plantation. The Y axis on the left indicates the sample number.
Figure 3Pollen profile at broadleaved forest and bare land in Guangdong, South China.
Note: BF = broadleaved forest (regional climax); BL = bare land. The Y axis on the left indicates soil depth (cm).
The 14C dating (a BP) of soils from the broadleaved forest and bare land in Guangdong, South China.
| Depth (cm) | 14C dating age (years BP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Site BF* | BL | |
| 0–5 | — | — |
| 5–10 | — | — |
| 10–15 | 761 ± 68 | 1040 ± 15 |
| 15–20 | 485 ± 66 | 590 ± 23 |
| 20–30 | 791 ± 67 | 505 ± 20 |
| 30–40 | 1315 ± 75 | 360 ± 18 |
| 40–50 | 1959 ± 75 | 1405 ± 20 |
| 50–60 | 2064 ± 73 | 1660 ± 16 |
| 60–70 | 2557 ± 73 | 2375 ± 25 |
| 70–80 | 2047 ± 73 | 1130 ± 20 |
Note: BF = broadleaved forest; BL = bare land.
*Data cited from Shen et al.43.
Pollen representativeness (R value) of main taxa in near-natural and artificial communities at the two study sites.
| Pollen types | R value in the indicated community | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF | MF | CF | CP | EP | BP | LP | Average | |
| — | — | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | 0.02 | |
| Rutaceae | 0.06 | 0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.26 | 0.26 | |
| — | — | — | 0.37 | — | — | — | 0.37 | |
| — | — | 0.57 | — | — | — | — | 0.57 | |
| — | — | — | — | — | 0.10 | 1.29 | 0.69 | |
| 0.60 | — | — | 0.70 | 1.48 | 0.03 | 0.99 | 0.76 | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.77 | 0.77 | |
| 1.37 | 1.52 | 2.55 | 1.32 | — | 0.25 | 2.23 | 1.54 | |
| 0.84 | 0.05 | 5.74 | — | — | 0.18 | — | 1.70 | |
| — | — | — | — | — | 3.56 | 0.36 | 1.96 | |
| 2.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.39 | |
| Myrsinaceae | 0.05 | 0.21 | — | — | — | — | 8.00 | 2.75 |
| 2.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.87 | |
| — | — | — | — | 3.56 | — | — | 3.56 | |
| — | 4.05 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.05 | |
| 4.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.33 | |
| — | 6.65 | 0.92 | 6.81 | — | — | — | 4.79 | |
| 0.07 | 6.08 | 0.42 | 1.22 | — | 6.71 | 15.21 | 4.95 | |
| — | 8.11 | 4.30 | — | — | — | — | 6.21 | |
| — | 14.46 | 8.93 | 19.63 | 1.32 | 9.67 | 1.56 | 9.26 | |
| 19.85 | 3.14 | — | — | — | — | — | 11.49 | |
| 19.13 | — | 12.91 | — | — | 5.45 | 7.22 | 11.18 | |
| 1.07 | 4.51 | 36.46 | 0.94 | 6.73 | 2.93 | 28.10 | 11.53 | |
| — | — | — | — | 1.53 | — | 33.67 | 17.60 | |
| 18.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.65 | |
Note: BF = broadleaved forest; MF = pine and broadleaved mixed forest; CF = coniferous forest; CP = coniferous plantation; EP = eucalyptus plantation; BP = broadleaved plantation; LP = legume plantation.
The similarities between pollen in the surface soil (0–5 cm depth) and current vegetation in South China.
| Status | Community | Ox | Px | Vx | Sorensen Index ( | Jaccard Index ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Near-natural | BF | 12 | 34 | 100 | 0.179 | 0.098 |
| MF | 10 | 28 | 63 | 0.220 | 0.123 | |
| CF | 9 | 37 | 36 | 0.247 | 0.141 | |
| Average | 10.3 | 33.0 | 66.3 | 0.215 | 0.121 | |
| Plantation | CP | 6 | 35 | 32 | 0.179 | 0.098 |
| EP | 4 | 31 | 27 | 0.138 | 0.074 | |
| BP | 8 | 46 | 40 | 0.186 | 0.103 | |
| LP | 11 | 39 | 47 | 0.256 | 0.147 | |
| Average | 7.3 | 37.8 | 36.5 | 0.190 | 0.105 | |
| Mean | 8.6 | 35.7 | 49.3 | 0.201 | 0.112 |
Note: BF = broadleaved forest; MF = pine and broadleaved mixed forest; CF = coniferous forest; CP = coniferous plantation; EP = eucalyptus plantation; BP = broadleaved plantation; LP = legume plantation. O is the number of overlapping taxa between the soil pollen and vegetation; P is the number of taxa observed in the soil pollen; and V is the number of taxa in current vegetation.
Similarities as indicated by the Sorensen Index between pollen in the surface soil (0–5 cm) and current vegetation and between the soil seed bank and current vegetation in the study sites.
| Site and forest type | Sorensen Index ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Pollen & Vegetation | Seed bank & Vegetation | |
| Dinghushan-Near-Natural forests | 0.22 | 0.44* |
| Heshan-Plantations | 0.19 | 0.34** |
| Average | 0.21 | 0.39 |
*(Shi et al.)25.
**(Wang et al.24; Wang et al.44).
The pollen counts of “stable taxa” in broadleaved forest soil profiles in subtropical China.
| Depth (cm) | Pollen counts of different taxa | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutaceae | Poaceae | ||||||||
| 0–5 | 12 | 181 | 44 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 1 |
| 5–10 | 10 | 409 | 21 | 76 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 38 | 2 |
| 10–20 | 8 | 279 | 10 | 52 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 48 | 1 |
| 20–40 | 4 | 218 | 32 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 102 | 1 |
| 40–80 | 28 | 8 | 45 | 38 | 3 | 1 | 152 | 390 | 94 |
The vegetation characteristics at the two study sites in subtropical China.
| Site | Community | Year after protection (years) | Dominant species in tree/shrub layer | Species number in tree layer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinghushan | Coniferous forest (CF) | 29 | Tree layer: | 33 |
| Dinghushan | Pine and broadleaved mixed forest (MF) | ~60 | Tree layer: | 55 |
| Dinghushan | Monsoon evergreen broadleaved forest (BF) | ~400 | Tree layer: | 88 |
| Heshan | Legume tree species mixed plantation (LP) | 28 | Tree layer | 11 |
| Heshan | Coniferous tree species mixed plantation (CP) | 28 | Tree layer: | 13 |
| Heshan | Native tree species mixed plantation (BP) | 28 | Tree layer: | 21 |
| Eucalyptus plantation (EP) | 28 | Tree layer: | 19 | |
| Heshan | Bare land (BL) | >20 | — | — |