| Literature DB >> 27857180 |
Shu Tang1, Bin Yin1, Erbao Song1, Hongbo Chen1, Yanfen Cheng1, Xiaohui Zhang1, Endong Bao1, Joerg Hartung2.
Abstract
We established in vivo and in vitro models to investigate the role of αB-Crystallin (CryAB) and assess the ability of aspirin (ASA) to protect the myocardium during prolonged heat stress. Thirty-day-old chickens were divided into three groups (n = 90): heat stress (HS, 40±1 °C); ASA(-)HS(+), 1 mg/kg ASA orally 2 h before heat stress; and ASA(+)HS(-), pretreated with aspirin, no heat stress (25 °C). Hearts were excised after 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15 and 24 h. Heat stress increased body temperature, though the ASA(-)HS(+) group had significantly higher temperatures than the ASA(+)HS(+) group at all time points. Compared to ASA(+)HS(+), the ASA(-)HS(+) group displayed increased sensitivity to heat stress. Pathological analysis revealed the ASA (+)HS(+) myocardium showed less severe changes (narrowed, chaotic fibers; fewer necrotic cells) than the ASA(-)HS(+) group (bleeding and extensive cell death). In vitro, ASA-pretreatment significantly increased primary chicken myocardial cell survival during heat stress. ELISAs indicated ASA induced CryAB in vivo to protect against heat stress-induced myocardial damage, but ASA did not induce CryAB in primary chicken myocardial cells. The mechanisms by which ASA induces the expression of CryAB in vivo and protects the myocardium during heat stress merit further research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27857180 PMCID: PMC5114548 DOI: 10.1038/srep37273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Rectal temperature of the chickens.
Figure 2Pathological changes in the chicken myocardium after different durations of heat stress (1 bar = 10 μm).
Chicken hearts were treated either by Heat stress or pre feed ASA (ASA+ Heat stress time). 1 h, 5 h, 15 h, 24 h treatment groups were stained with H&E and photographed using a Carl Zeiss optical microscope. (A) Control group (25 °C); (F) ASA pre treated control. As shown in (A,F), chicken myocardium showed no obvious pathological changes. These two groups showed no difference; (B) After 1 hour of heat stress, the space between cardiac fiber became wider and acute degeneration (▲) were observed in the cytoplasm compared to ASA(−)HS(+) control cells, the ASA(+) HS(+) group at 1 hour showed mild chaotic of cardiac fibers; (C) After 5 hours of heat stress, cell degeneration (▲) can be observed at nearly all views on the slide, and several cells showed karyopyknosis (→). In (H), the main pathological changes were cell degeneration (▲); (D) Karyopyknosis (→) accompanied by bleeding (←) can be abserved after 15 hours of heat stress. (I) Some necrotic (→) and cell degeneration (▲) were the main pathological changes after ASA pre treatment; (E) After 24 hours of heat stress, both ASA(−)HS(+) and ASA(+) HS(+) (G) showed bleeding and chaotic cardiac fibers, however in ASA(−)HS(+) group, more severe cell damage can be obviously observed. The ASA(+)HS(−) group was also observed in present experiment, there was no obvious pathological changes in all groups (data not shown).
Figure 3
Figure 4CryAB expression in the chicken myocardium during heat stress in vivo.
(**P < 0.01).
Figure 5ELISA of CryAB expression in vitro.
a: P < 0.01: ASA(+)HS(−) compared to HS group; b: P < 0.01: ASA(+)HS(+) compared to HS group; c: P < 0.01: ASA(+)HS(+) compared to ASA(−)HS(+) group.