Literature DB >> 27856966

Longitudinal Stability of Common TMJ Structural Disorders.

E L Schiffman1, M Ahmad1, L Hollender2, K Kartha3,4, R Ohrbach4, E L Truelove2, L Zhang5, J S Hodges6, E Sommers2, G C Anderson7, Y M Gonzalez4, X Guo8, J O Look1.   

Abstract

The longitudinal course of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement (DD) and degenerative joint disease (DJD) has never been conclusively described with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, respectively. This 8-y observational study's objective was to assess the longitudinal stability of DD and DJD among 401 subjects. The Validation Project provided baseline measures; follow-up was performed in the TMJ Impact Project. With magnetic resonance imaging, 2 radiologists rendered a consensus diagnosis of normal/indeterminate, DD with reduction, or DD without reduction. Computed tomography consensus diagnoses included normal/indeterminate, grade 1 DJD, or grade 2 DJD. Radiologist reliability was assessed by kappa; a Hui-Walter model was used to estimate, after accounting for diagnostic disagreement, the frequency of diagnostic progression and reversal. Permutation tests were used to test the statistical influence of concurrent baseline diagnoses on diagnostic changes at follow-up. Of 789 baseline joint-specific soft tissue diagnoses of DD, 598 (76%) joints showed no change; 109 (14%) demonstrated progression; and 82 (10%) had reversal. Of 794 joints with baseline joint-specific hard tissue diagnoses of DJD, progression was observed in 122 (15%) joints, no change in 564 (71%), and reversal in 108 (14%). Radiologist reliability (kappa) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.83) for DD and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.83) for DJD. After accounting for the influence of diagnostic disagreement, progression of hard tissue diagnoses in the right TMJ occurred in 15.2% of subjects (95% CI, 10.5% to 20.8%) and reversal in 8.3% (95% CI, 4.9% to 12.3%); results were similar for soft tissue diagnoses and the left TMJ. Concurrent baseline soft tissue diagnoses were associated with hard tissue diagnostic changes at follow-up ( P < 0.0001). Baseline hard tissue diagnoses showed no statistical association with soft tissue changes at follow-up ( P = 0.11). Longitudinally, 76% of baseline TMJ soft tissue diagnoses and 71% of the baseline hard tissue diagnoses remained stable. Diagnostic reversal and progression were confirmed for both soft and hard tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biostatistics; computed tomography; imaging; joint disease; magnetic resonance imaging; orofacial pain/TMD

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27856966      PMCID: PMC5298394          DOI: 10.1177/0022034516679396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  18 in total

1.  A comparative study of accuracy of detection of surface osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint using multidetector CT and cone beam CT.

Authors:  E H Zain-Alabdeen; R I Alsadhan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Diagnosing TMJ internal derangement and osteoarthritis with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Bertram; A Rudisch; K Innerhofer; E Pümpel; G Grubwieser; R Emshoff
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Temporomandibular joints in asymptomatic and symptomatic nonpatient volunteers: a prospective 15-year follow-up clinical and MR imaging study.

Authors:  Hanna Salé; Fredrik Bryndahl; Annika Isberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: overview and methodology for assessment of validity.

Authors:  Eric L Schiffman; Edmond L Truelove; Richard Ohrbach; Gary C Anderson; Mike T John; Thomas List; John O Look
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2010

6.  Temporomandibular joint internal derangement type III: relationship to magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement and osteoarthrosis. An intraindividual approach.

Authors:  R Emshoff; A Rudisch; K Innerhofer; R Bösch; S Bertram
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Effects of four treatment strategies for temporomandibular joint closed lock.

Authors:  E L Schiffman; A M Velly; J O Look; J S Hodges; J Q Swift; K L Decker; Q N Anderson; R B Templeton; P A Lenton; W Kang; J R Fricton
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Grading the severity of chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael Von Korff; Johan Ormel; Francis J Keefe; Samuel F Dworkin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Description of population and progress of symptoms in a longitudinal study of temporomandibular arthropathy.

Authors:  O C Rasmussen
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1981-04

10.  Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis.

Authors:  Mansur Ahmad; Lars Hollender; Quentin Anderson; Krishnan Kartha; Richard Ohrbach; Edmond L Truelove; Mike T John; Eric L Schiffman
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-06
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ancillary factors in the treatment of orofacial pain: A topical narrative review.

Authors:  Marcello Melis; Massimiliano Di Giosia; Luana Colloca
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Mechanobehavioral Scores in Women with and without TMJ Disc Displacement.

Authors:  L R Iwasaki; Y M Gonzalez; Y Liu; H Liu; M Markova; L M Gallo; J C Nickel
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Mechanobehavior and Ontogenesis of the Temporomandibular Joint.

Authors:  J C Nickel; L R Iwasaki; Y M Gonzalez; L M Gallo; H Yao
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Older Adults.

Authors:  Sumit Yadav; Yun Yang; Eliane H Dutra; Jennifer L Robinson; Sunil Wadhwa
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Reliability and diagnostic validity of a joint vibration analysis device.

Authors:  Sonia Sharma; Heidi C Crow; Krishnan Kartha; W D McCall; Yoly M Gonzalez
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Expertise Modulates Students' Perception of Pain From a Self-Perspective: Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Sareh Said Yekta-Michael; André Schüppen; Arnim Johannes Gaebler; Jens Ellrich; Jan Willem Koten
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.