Justin T Huntington1, Joseph J Lopez2, Justin B Mahida3, Erica J Ambeba2, Lindsey Asti2, Katherine J Deans3, Peter C Minneci4. 1. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 2. Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH. 3. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH. 4. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: Peter.Minneci@nationwidechildrens.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open Ladd's procedure on 30-day postoperative outcomes. METHODS: All elective Ladd's procedures performed on patients with intestinal malrotation in the 2013-2014 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric were identified. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to account for baseline differences between groups, and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to compare 30-day outcomes between open versus laparoscopic groups. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (18.6%) patients underwent laparoscopic Ladd's while 253 (81.4%) underwent an open technique. After propensity score matching, 53 laparoscopic cases (38.1%) and 86 open cases (61.9%) were identified and compared for outcomes. Total length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group compared to the open group (6 vs. 4days, p<0.001). Postoperative length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group as well (5 vs. 4days, p<0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 5 laparoscopic cases (9.4%) and in 18 open cases (20.9%), but did not meet statistical significance (p=0.08). One laparoscopic patient (1.9%) and 8 open patients (9.3%) required hospitalization beyond 30days, but this also did not meet significance (p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In a matched analysis, laparoscopic Ladd's led to shorter hospital stays than open Ladd's in the initial 30-day postoperative period. Short-term benefits of laparoscopic Ladd's lend support for using additional resources to perform multi-institutional studies to compare differences in long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open Ladd's. TYPE OF STUDY: Therapeutic LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open Ladd's procedure on 30-day postoperative outcomes. METHODS: All elective Ladd's procedures performed on patients with intestinal malrotation in the 2013-2014 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric were identified. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to account for baseline differences between groups, and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to compare 30-day outcomes between open versus laparoscopic groups. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (18.6%) patients underwent laparoscopic Ladd's while 253 (81.4%) underwent an open technique. After propensity score matching, 53 laparoscopic cases (38.1%) and 86 open cases (61.9%) were identified and compared for outcomes. Total length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group compared to the open group (6 vs. 4days, p<0.001). Postoperative length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group as well (5 vs. 4days, p<0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 5 laparoscopic cases (9.4%) and in 18 open cases (20.9%), but did not meet statistical significance (p=0.08). One laparoscopic patient (1.9%) and 8 open patients (9.3%) required hospitalization beyond 30days, but this also did not meet significance (p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In a matched analysis, laparoscopic Ladd's led to shorter hospital stays than open Ladd's in the initial 30-day postoperative period. Short-term benefits of laparoscopic Ladd's lend support for using additional resources to perform multi-institutional studies to compare differences in long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open Ladd's. TYPE OF STUDY: Therapeutic LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Camille Lupiañez-Merly; Stephanie C Torres-Ayala; Lorena Morales; Adel Gonzalez; José A Lara-Del Rio; Ivonne Ojeda-Boscana Journal: Am J Case Rep Date: 2018-04-16