Literature DB >> 27855497

Bladder Neck Contracture After Radical Prostatectomy: What Is the Reality of Care?

Daniel Pfalzgraf1, Fabian P Siegel1, Maximilian C Kriegmair1, Nina Wagener1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the therapeutic methods and algorithms currently used in the treatment of bladder neck contracture (BNC) after radical prostatectomy (RP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Heads of 170 urologic departments in Germany, listed at the German Society of Urology (DGU), were invited to participate in an Internet-based customized survey. The questions consisted of an epidemiologic part (kind of hospital, state of practice) and questions inquiring used surgical techniques with their respective incidence and given algorithms for therapy.
RESULTS: Of 170 contacted heads of urologic departments in Germany, 84 responded to the questionnaire (return rate 49.41%). The most common treatment modalities are transurethral resection, cold knife incision, hot knife incision, and dilation in descending order. For those institutions using several treatment modalities, 56 (66.67%) follow a therapeutic algorithm, while 28 (33.33%) follow no set order of treatment. However, among the 56 institutions with a set algorithm, 33 different approaches were identified. Of 84 institutions, 29 (34.52%) perform open reanastomosis in case of recurrent BNC, the remaining 55 (65.48%) do not.
CONCLUSION: Despite several published guidelines on urethral strictures, numerous self-employed treatment algorithms are used to treat BNC. Although treatment results of these algorithms and the underlying treatment modalities cannot be determined with this work, it highlights the necessity for further studies comparing the different surgeries to allow for a more evidence-based approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anastomotic stricture; bladder neck contracture; bladder neck stricture; radical prostatectomy; therapy; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27855497     DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Bladder neck sclerosis following prostate surgery : Which therapy when?]

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; H Weiss; A Heinze; M Elmussareh; M Fiedler; A S Goezen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Treatment outcomes of bladder neck contractures from surgical clip erosion: a matched cohort comparison.

Authors:  Vidit Sharma; R Jeffrey Karnes; Boyd R Viers
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02

3.  Vesico-urethral anastomotic stenosis following radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome analysis with a focus on endoscopic approach, surgical sequence, and the impact of radiation therapy.

Authors:  D Pfalzgraf; T Worst; J Kranz; J Steffens; G Salomon; M Fisch; C P Reiß; M W Vetterlein; C M Rosenbaum
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  New steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the extraperitoneal approach: a propensity-score matched comparison between extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurokawa; Yukihiro Umemoto; Kentaro Mizuno; Atsushi Okada; Akihiro Nakane; Hidenori Nishio; Shuzo Hamamoto; Ryosuke Ando; Noriyasu Kawai; Keiichi Tozawa; Yutaro Hayashi; Takahiro Yasui
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Posterior urethral stenosis after prostate cancer treatment: contemporary options for definitive management.

Authors:  Arman A Kahokehr; Andrew C Peterson; Aaron C Lentz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.