OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the morphology of the sella turcica and measure its size in cleft and noncleft subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 54 individuals (29 males; 25 females) with cleft and 85 (22 males; 63 females) without cleft were used for this study. Syndromic patients with cleft(s) were not included because of possible additional endocrinological and/or morphological disorders. Linear measurements included length, depth, and diameter. The shape of the sella turcica was analyzed in the cleft and noncleft groups. An independent t test was conducted to evaluate differences between genders and groups. One-way ANOVA was used to compare age groups. RESULTS: The length (p < 0.001) of the sella turcica was smaller in noncleft subjects than in cleft subjects. Diameter (p = 0.014) and depth (p = 0.005) showed as constantly increasing from an age <15 to >25 years in the overall assessment. The distribution of the shape of the sella turcica differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CBCT was used to assess the morphology of the sella turcica. A majority of the subjects with cleft had a flattened sella turcica compared to that of the control group. A shorter length of the sella turcica was more evident in the cleft subjects than in the control group.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the morphology of the sella turcica and measure its size in cleft and noncleft subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 54 individuals (29 males; 25 females) with cleft and 85 (22 males; 63 females) without cleft were used for this study. Syndromic patients with cleft(s) were not included because of possible additional endocrinological and/or morphological disorders. Linear measurements included length, depth, and diameter. The shape of the sella turcica was analyzed in the cleft and noncleft groups. An independent t test was conducted to evaluate differences between genders and groups. One-way ANOVA was used to compare age groups. RESULTS: The length (p < 0.001) of the sella turcica was smaller in noncleft subjects than in cleft subjects. Diameter (p = 0.014) and depth (p = 0.005) showed as constantly increasing from an age <15 to >25 years in the overall assessment. The distribution of the shape of the sella turcica differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CBCT was used to assess the morphology of the sella turcica. A majority of the subjects with cleft had a flattened sella turcica compared to that of the control group. A shorter length of the sella turcica was more evident in the cleft subjects than in the control group.
Authors: Mustafa Ali Akin; Selim Kurtoğlu; Dilek Sarici; Leyla Akin; Nihal Hatipoğlu; Levent Korkmaz; Tamer Güneş; Mehmet Adnan Oztürk; Mustafa Akçakuş Journal: Turk J Med Sci Date: 2014 Impact factor: 0.973
Authors: Bruna T Silveira; Karin S Fernandes; Tarcila Trivino; Larissa Y F Dos Santos; Claudio F de Freitas Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2020-01-04 Impact factor: 1.246