Julie Johnson1, Dominic Hodgkin2, Sion Kim Harris3. 1. Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School of Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453, USA; Center for Adolescent Substance Abuse Research (CeASAR), Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: juliej@brandeis.edu. 2. Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School of Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453, USA. Electronic address: hodgkin@brandeis.edu. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Adolescent Substance Abuse Research (CeASAR), Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: sion.harris@childrens.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between U.S. state medical marijuana laws (MML), the most liberal category of marijuana policies before legalization, their specific provisions, and adolescent past-30-day use and heavy marijuana use. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study used state Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) data collected during 1991-2011 from 45 states (N=715,014) to examine MML effects, taking advantage of heterogeneity across states in MML status and design. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to adjust for state and year effects, and youth demographics. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses found that MMLs were associated with higher rates of adolescent past-30-day marijuana use (odds ratio [OR]=1.08, 95% confidence interval, [(CI)=1.03,1.13]) and heavy marijuana use (OR=1.12, [CI=1.05,1.21]). However, analyses adjusting for state/year effects found a 7% lower odds of use (OR=0.99, [CI=0.98,0.999]) and no difference in heavy use. In the adjusted models, years since MML enactment (OR=0.93, [CI=0.86,0.99]) and MML inclusion of more liberalized provisions (OR=0.98, [CI=0.96,0.998]) were associated with slightly lowered odds of past-30-day marijuana use. Conversely, allowance for ≥2.5 usable marijuana ounces was associated with higher past-30-day marijuana use odds (OR=1.21, [CI=1.09,1.34]) and a voluntary vs. mandatory patient registration with higher odds of both past-30-day use (OR=1.41, [CI=1.28,1.56]) and heavy use (OR=1.23, [CI=1.08,1.40]). CONCLUSIONS: MML enactment, years since enactment, and inclusion of more liberalized provisions were not associated with increased adolescent marijuana use in this dataset after adjusting for state and year effects; however, higher possession limits and a voluntary registration were. It is possible that state norms are the impetus for MML enactment.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between U.S. state medical marijuana laws (MML), the most liberal category of marijuana policies before legalization, their specific provisions, and adolescent past-30-day use and heavy marijuana use. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study used state Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) data collected during 1991-2011 from 45 states (N=715,014) to examine MML effects, taking advantage of heterogeneity across states in MML status and design. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to adjust for state and year effects, and youth demographics. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses found that MMLs were associated with higher rates of adolescent past-30-day marijuana use (odds ratio [OR]=1.08, 95% confidence interval, [(CI)=1.03,1.13]) and heavy marijuana use (OR=1.12, [CI=1.05,1.21]). However, analyses adjusting for state/year effects found a 7% lower odds of use (OR=0.99, [CI=0.98,0.999]) and no difference in heavy use. In the adjusted models, years since MML enactment (OR=0.93, [CI=0.86,0.99]) and MML inclusion of more liberalized provisions (OR=0.98, [CI=0.96,0.998]) were associated with slightly lowered odds of past-30-day marijuana use. Conversely, allowance for ≥2.5 usable marijuana ounces was associated with higher past-30-day marijuana use odds (OR=1.21, [CI=1.09,1.34]) and a voluntary vs. mandatory patient registration with higher odds of both past-30-day use (OR=1.41, [CI=1.28,1.56]) and heavy use (OR=1.23, [CI=1.08,1.40]). CONCLUSIONS: MML enactment, years since enactment, and inclusion of more liberalized provisions were not associated with increased adolescent marijuana use in this dataset after adjusting for state and year effects; however, higher possession limits and a voluntary registration were. It is possible that state norms are the impetus for MML enactment.
Authors: Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Jamie F Chriqui; Deborah A Reichmann; Yvonne M Terry-McElrath Journal: J Public Health Policy Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.222
Authors: Melanie M Wall; Ernest Poh; Magdalena Cerdá; Katherine M Keyes; Sandro Galea; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Pia M Mauro; Hannah Carliner; Qiana L Brown; Deborah S Hasin; Dvora Shmulewitz; Reanne Rahim-Juwel; Aaron L Sarvet; Melanie M Wall; Silvia S Martins Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Shadiya L Moss; Julian Santaella-Tenorio; Pia M Mauro; Katherine M Keyes; Silvia S Martins Journal: Addiction Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 6.526