Literature DB >> 2785469

Histologic pattern of small bowel allograft rejection in the rat. Mucosal biopsies do not provide sufficient information.

T Schmid1, G Oberhuber, G Körözsi, G Klima, R Margreiter.   

Abstract

Accessory small bowel transplantation was performed in a rat model, and the histologic sequence of acute rejection with and without immunosuppression with cyclosporine defined. The first rejection episodes occurred on the fifth postoperative day, defined as phase I. The mucosa and submucosa of the grafts were infiltrated by mononuclear and polynuclear leukocytes, and lymphocytes were scattered along the myenteric ganglia. Three to five days later (phase II) the infiltrate intensified and was associated with villous flattening and sloughing of epithelial cells. The muscular layer was invaded by numerous lymphocytes and neutrophils. At the end of the rejection episode complete destruction of the mucosa and the muscular layer developed (phase III). As no lesion other than lymphocytic infiltration could be detected in the mucosa in phases I and II of rejection, which may be considered reversible, and this change is known to be unspecific, biopsies of the mucosa alone are inadequate for a purely histologic diagnosis of small bowel allograft rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2785469     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90522-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  7 in total

1.  Rejection of multivisceral allografts in rats: a sequential analysis with comparison to isolated orthotopic small-bowel and liver grafts.

Authors:  N Murase; A J Demetris; D G Kim; S Todo; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Myoelectric activity during small bowel allograft rejection.

Authors:  H Pernthaler; A Kreczy; R Plattner; G Pfurtscheller; L Saltuari; T Schmid; D Ofner; G Klima; R Margreiter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The effect of small bowel transplantation on the morphology and physiology of intestinal muscle: a comparison of autografts versus allografts in dogs.

Authors:  A Sugitani; A J Bauer; J C Reynolds; W M Halfter; M Nomoto; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  In situ proliferating status of mononuclear cells in rat small bowel grafts.

Authors:  M Okamoto; K Arakawa; S Fushiki
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  [Model of electromyographic study of small intestinal transplants in the rat].

Authors:  H Pernthaler; L Saltuari; G Pfurtscheller; W Thaler; P Waldenberger; G Klima; R Margreiter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

6.  Value of in vivo electrophysiological measurements to evaluate canine small bowel autotransplants.

Authors:  M A Meijssen; E Heineman; R W de Bruin; H J Veeze; J Bijman; H R de Jonge; F J ten Kate; R L Marquet; J C Molenaar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Effect of rejection on electrophysiologic function of canine intestinal grafts: correlation with histopathology and Na-K-ATPase activity.

Authors:  I Takeyoshi; S Zhang; Y Kokudo; K Nakamura; A Ikoma; Y Zhu; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.533

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.