Efthimios Parasidis1, Douglas J Opel1. 1. Efthimios Parasidis is with the Moritz College of Law and the College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus. Douglas J. Opel is with the Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, and Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relation of vaccine refusal and medical neglect under child welfare laws. METHODS: We used the Westlaw legal database to search court opinions from 1905 to 2016 and identified cases in which vaccine refusal was the sole or a primary reason in a neglect proceeding. We also delineated if religious or philosophical exemptions from required school immunizations were available at the time of adjudication. RESULTS: Our search yielded 9 cases from 5 states. Most courts (7 of 9) considered vaccine refusal to constitute neglect. In the 4 cases decided in jurisdictions that permitted religious exemptions, courts either found that vaccine refusal did not constitute neglect or considered it neglect only in the absence of a sincere religious objection to vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Some states have a legal precedent for considering parental vaccine refusal as medical neglect, but this is based on a small number of cases. Each state should clarify whether, under its laws, vaccine refusal constitutes medical neglect.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relation of vaccine refusal and medical neglect under child welfare laws. METHODS: We used the Westlaw legal database to search court opinions from 1905 to 2016 and identified cases in which vaccine refusal was the sole or a primary reason in a neglect proceeding. We also delineated if religious or philosophical exemptions from required school immunizations were available at the time of adjudication. RESULTS: Our search yielded 9 cases from 5 states. Most courts (7 of 9) considered vaccine refusal to constitute neglect. In the 4 cases decided in jurisdictions that permitted religious exemptions, courts either found that vaccine refusal did not constitute neglect or considered it neglect only in the absence of a sincere religious objection to vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Some states have a legal precedent for considering parental vaccine refusal as medical neglect, but this is based on a small number of cases. Each state should clarify whether, under its laws, vaccine refusal constitutes medical neglect.
Authors: Olivia S Kates; Erica J Stohs; Steven A Pergam; Robert M Rakita; Marian G Michaels; Cameron R Wolfe; Lara Danziger-Isakov; Michael G Ison; Emily A Blumberg; Raymund R Razonable; Elisa J Gordon; Douglas S Diekema Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 9.369