| Literature DB >> 27854252 |
Suzanne J Snodgrass1,2, Maya Guest3,4, Ashley K Kable5, Carole James6,7, Samantha E Ashby8,9, Ronald C Plotnikoff10,11, Clare E Collins12,13.
Abstract
The prevalence of obesity is increasing. The potential for allied health professionals to intervene through the provision of lifestyle advice is unknown. This study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals in the provision of dietary and physical activity advice for clients with overweight or obesity. Dietitians, exercise physiologists, nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists and psychologists (n = 296) working in New South Wales were surveyed using paper-based and online methods. The majority of health professionals (71%) believed that providing weight management advice was within their scope of practice; 81% provided physical activity advice but only 57% provided dietary advice. Other than dietitians, few had received training in client weight management during their professional qualification (14%) or continuing education (16%). Providing dietary advice was associated with: believing it was within their scope of practice (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.9-7.9, p < 0.01), training during their entry-level qualification (OR 7.2, 3.2-16.4, p < 0.01) and having departmental guidelines (OR 4.7, 2.1-10.9, p < 0.01). Most health professionals are willing to provide lifestyle advice to clients with overweight or obesity but few have received required training. Developing guidelines and training for in client weight management may potentially impact on rising obesity levels.Entities:
Keywords: allied health; diet; health behaviour; health promotion; obesity; physical activity; weight management
Year: 2016 PMID: 27854252 PMCID: PMC5198127 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare4040085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Composition of the study sample, by allied health profession.
| Type of Health Professional | Invited | Participated ( | Response Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dietitians | 129 | 42 | 32.6 |
| Physical therapists | 272 | 65 | 23.9 |
| Occupational therapists | 209 | 57 | 27.3 |
| Psychologist | 200 | 26 | 13.0 |
| Exercise physiologists | 30 | 7 | 23.3 |
| Occupational health nurses | 23 | 7 | 30.4 |
| Nurses | 630 | 92 | 14.6 |
| TOTAL | 1493 | 296 | 19.8 |
* n represents the total number of respondents for each health professional group.
Demographics of allied health professionals (n = 296) participating in survey.
| Variable | Dietitian | Physical Therapist | Occupational Therapist | Nurse | Psychologist | Total | Pearson Chi2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chi2 | |||||||||
| Gender | |||||||||
| Male | 2 (5.6) | 30 (42) | 5 (9.8) | 7 (8.9) | 4 (15) | 48 (19) | |||
| Female | 34 (94) | 42 (58) | 46 (90) | 72 (91) | 17 (81) | 211(81) | 37.0 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Highest level of qualification | |||||||||
| Undergraduate | 21 (58) | 47 (65) | 42 (82) | 16 (21) | 4 (19) | 130 (50) | |||
| Postgraduate | 15 (42) | 25 (35) | 9 (18) | 62 (79) | 17 (81) | 128 (50) | 64.2 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Area of practice | |||||||||
| Aged, community, home care | 15 (42) | 2 (2.8) | 16 (31) | 35 (44) | 13 (62) | 81 (31) | |||
| Rehabilitation centre | 0 (0.0) | 4 (5.6) | 7 (14) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (4.8) | 13 (5.0) | |||
| Public hospital | 10 (28) | 27 (38) | 18 (35) | 32 (41) | 3 (14) | 90 (35) | |||
| Private practice | 11 (31) | 37 (51) | 5 (9.8) | 3 (3.0) | 2 (7.7) | 58 (20) | |||
| Other including mental health | 0 (0) | 2 (2.8) | 5 (9.8) | 8 (10) | 2 (9.5) | 17 (6.6) | 98.3 | 16 | <0.01 |
| Location of practice | |||||||||
| Major City | 10 (28) | 37 (51) | 22 (43) | 16 (20) | 13 (62) | 98 (38) | |||
| Inner Regional | 7 (19) | 6 (8.3) | 11 (22) | 15 (19) | 3 (14) | 42 (16) | |||
| Outer Regional | 16 (44) | 23 (32) | 15 (29) | 38 (48) | 5 (24) | 97 (37) | |||
| Remote | 3 (8.3) | 3 (4.2) | 2 (3.9) | 10 (11) | 0 (0.0) | 17 (6.6) | |||
| Unreported | 0 (0) | 3 (4.2) | 1 (2.0) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 5 (1.9) | 32.9 | 16 | <0.01 |
| Within scope of practice to provide advice | |||||||||
| Yes | 34 (94) | 60 (83) | 23 (47) | 53 (67) | 12 (60) | 182 (71) | |||
| No | 2 (5.6) | 12 (17) | 26 (53) | 26 (33) | 8 (40) | 74 (29) | 30.5 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Training in weight management during entry-level professional qualification | |||||||||
| Yes | 38 (100) * | 19 (26) | 4 (8) | 17 (22) | 0 (0.0) | 76 (29) | |||
| No | 0 (0) | 43 (60) | 39 (76) | 53 (67) | 18 (86) | 153 (59) | |||
| Unsure | 0 (0) | 10 (14) | 8 (16) | 9 (11) | 3 (14) | 30 (12) | 110 | 8 | <0.01 |
| Attended continuing education in weight management | 32 (84) | 14 (19) | 9 (16) | 18 (20) | 5 (20) | 78 (28) | 71.5 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Department has guidelines for providing weight management advice | 20 (57) | 10 (14) | 5 (10) | 27 (35) | 4 (20) | 66 (26) | 32.2 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Years in clinical practice | 11 (9) | 14 (10) | 10 (7) | 22 (9) | 11 (6) | 15 (10) | 19.7 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Hours worked per week | 31 (10) | 35 (11) | 37 (9) | 36 (9) | 31 (7) | 35 (10) | 3.2 | 4 | 0.02 |
| Number of new clients/week | 7 (4) | 14 (18) | 5 (6) | 13 (22) | 3.0 (3) | 10 (16) | 4.7 | 4 | <0.01 |
| % clients overweight or obese | 58 (30) | 47 (25) | 38 (23) | 42 (26) | 27 (21) | 44 (26) | 6.1 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Number referrals/week made to other services for weight management | 8 (11) | 11 (24) | 7 (20) | 10 (27) | 2 (7) | 9 (22) | 0.9 | 4 | 0.5 † |
* n represents the total number of respondents for each health professional group. Percentages are calculated for individual items, as the number of responses per item differed (missing responses were not included in the percentage calculation); † Non-significant values truncated at one decimal place.
Allied health professionals reported practices related to provision of dietary advice for weight management.
| Variable | Dietitian | Physical Therapist | Occupational Therapist | Nurse | Psychologist | Total | Pearson Chi2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chi2 | df | ||||||||
| Yes, dietary advice is provided | 36 (100) | 32 (46) | 10 (21) | 55 (73) | 8 (42) | 141 (57) | |||
| No, dietary advice is not provided | 0 (0) | 38 (54) | 38 (79) | 20 (27) | 11 (58) | 107 (43) | 66.2 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Format in which dietary advice is provided if dietary advice provided | |||||||||
| Dietary info provided via printed info | 36 (100) | 9 (28) | 5 (50) | 34 (62) | 4 (50) | 88 (62) | 38.9 | 4 | <0.01 |
| Dietary info provided via discussion with client | 36 (100) | 28 (88) | 8 (80) | 53 (96) | 6 (75) | 131 (93) | 11.6 | 4 | 0.02 |
| Dietary info provided via internet/electronic info | 18 (50) | 2 (6.3) | 1 (10) | 9 (16) | 1 (13) | 31 (22) | 23.4 | 4 | <0.01 |
Logistic regression modelling of factors associated with provision of dietary advice.
| Univariate Analysis | Parsimonious Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Response | Odds Ratio | (95% CI) | Odds Ratio | (95% CI) | ||
| Providing advice within scope of practice | Yes | 5.3 | (2.9, 9.7) | <0.01 | 3.9 | (1.9, 7.9) | <0.01 |
| No | * | ||||||
| Gender | Female | 1.3 | (0.7, 2.5) | 0.37 † | |||
| Male | * | ||||||
| Profession | Occupational therapist | 0.3 | (0.1, 0.7) | <0.01 | |||
| Nurse | 3.3 | (1.6, 6.5) | <0.01 | ||||
| Psychologist | 0.9 | (0.3, 2.4) | 0.78 | ||||
| Physical therapist | * | ||||||
| Years in practice | <5 | * | |||||
| 5–9.9 | 1.0 | (0.4, 2.4) | 0.99 | ||||
| 10–19.9 | 1.2 | (0.6, 2.6) | 0.63 | ||||
| >20 | 1.5 | (0.7, 3.2) | 0.28 | ||||
| Location of practice | Major City | * | |||||
| Inner Regional | 0.8 | (0.4, 1.7) | 0.55 | ||||
| Outer Regional | 1.0 | (0.6, 1.9) | 0.90 | ||||
| Remote | 0.9 | (0.2, 2.4) | 0.89 | ||||
| Unreported | 0.2 | (0.9, 2.1) | 0.23 | ||||
| Highest level of qualification | Undergraduate | * | |||||
| Postgraduate | 1.7 | (1.0, 2.8) | 0.05 | ||||
| Hours worked per week | <30 | * | |||||
| 30–38 | 1.1 | (0.6, 2.2) | 0.75 | ||||
| >38 | 0.7 | (0.4, 1.4) | 0.35 | ||||
| Weight management education in entry-level professional qualification | No | * | |||||
| Yes | 9.8 | (4.5, 21.2) | <0.01 | 7.2 | (3.2, 16.4) | <0.01 | |
| Unsure | 1.8 | (0.7, 4.1) | 0.20 | 2.0 | (0.8, 5.2) | 0.17 | |
| Attended continuing education in weight management | No | * | |||||
| Yes | 5.8 | (2.9, 11.9) | <0.01 | ||||
| Departmental guidelines | No | * | |||||
| Yes | 6.8 | (3.2, 14.6) | <0.01 | 4.7 | (2.1, 10.9) | <0.01 | |
* Indicates reference category for categorical variables; † Non-significant values truncated at one decimal.
Allied health professionals reported practices related to provision of physical activity advice for weight management.
| Response | Dietitian | Physical Therapist | Occupational Therapist | Nurse | Psychologist | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, physical activity advice provided | 35 (97) | 62 (91) | 30 (65) | 60 (81) | 10 (56) | 197 (81) |
| No, physical activity advice not provided | 1 (2.8) | 6 (8.8) | 16 (35) | 14 (19) | 8 (44) | 45 (19) |
| Format in which physical activity advice is provided | ||||||
| Physical activity information provided—printed information | 19 (54) | 34 (55) | 10 (33) | 30 (50) | 4 (40) | 97 (50) |
| Physical activity information provided—discussion with client | 33 (94) | 61 (98) | 29 (97) | 53 (88) | 9 (90) | 185 (94) |
| Physical activity information provided—internet/electronic info | 4 (11) | 8 (13) | 1 (3.3) | 5 (8.3) | 0 (0) | 18 (9.1) |
Logistic regression modelling of factors associated with providing physical activity advice.
| Univariate Analysis | Parsimonious Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Response | Odds Ratio | (95% CI) | Odds Ratio | (95% CI) | ||
| Providing advice within scope of practice | Yes | 8.2 | (4.0, 16.7) | <0.01 | 2.7 | (1.1, 6.0) | 0.03 |
| No | * | ||||||
| Gender | Female | 0.5 | (0.2, 1.43) | 0.21 † | |||
| Male | * | ||||||
| Profession | Physical therapist | * | |||||
| Occupational therapist | 0.2 | (0.1, 0.5) | <0.01 | 0.3 | (0.1, 1.1) | 0.08 | |
| Nurse | 0.4 | (0.2, 1.2) | 0.10 | 0.8 | (0.2, 2.7) | 0.72 | |
| Psychologist | 0.1 | (0.0, 0.4) | <0.01 | 0.2 | (0.04, 0.8) | 0.02 | |
| Dietitian | 3.6 | (0.4, 30.8) | 0.25 | 1.0 | (0.1, 11.6) | 0.98 | |
| Years in practice | 1.0 | (1.0, 1.0) | 0.60 | ||||
| Location of practice | Major City | * | |||||
| Inner Regional | 0.7 | (0.3, 1.7) | 0.37 | ||||
| Outer Regional | 0.7 | (0.3, 1.6) | 0.46 | ||||
| Remote | 0.6 | (0.2, 2.0) | 0.36 | ||||
| Area of practice | Aged, community, home care | * | |||||
| Rehabilitation centre | 3.2 | (0.4, 26.3) | 0.29 | ||||
| Public hospital | 1.1 | (0.5, 2.9) | 0.87 | ||||
| Private practice | 1.9 | (0.7, 5.3) | 0.21 | ||||
| Other including mental health | 1.4 | (0.4, 4.8) | 0.55 | ||||
| Highest level of qualification | Undergraduate | * | |||||
| Postgraduate | 1.1 | (0.6, 2.2) | 0.71 | ||||
| Hours worked per week | 1.0 | (1, 1) | 0.50 | ||||
| Hours worked per week in direct patient care | 1.0 | (1, 1.1) | 0.02 | ||||
| Weight management education in entry-level professional qualification | No | * | |||||
| Yes | 5.7 | (2.0, 17.0) | <0.01 | ||||
| Unsure | 1.4 | (0.5, 4.1) | 0.49 | ||||
| Attended continuing education in weight management | No | * | |||||
| Yes | 11.3 | (2.6, 48.0) | <0.01 | 7.4 | (1.3, 40.5) | 0.02 | |
| Proportion of clients overweight or obese | 1.0 | (1.0, 1.1) | <0.01 | 1.0 | (1.0, 1.1) | <0.01 | |
| Number of clients referred to other services for weight management | 1.0 | (0.99, 1.0) | 0.5 | 0.99 | (0.96, 1.0) | 0.02 | |
| Departmental guidelines | No | * | |||||
| Yes | 3.3 | (1.2, 8.8) | 0.01 | ||||
* Indicates reference category for categorical variables; † Non-significant values truncated at one decimal.