Emily A Glover1, John D Taylor1. 1. Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Abstract
A new shallow water species of the lucinid bivalve Pleurolucina is described from Curaçao in the southern Caribbean Sea and compared with known species of the genus from the western Atlantic and eastern Pacific Oceans. Although confused with the Floridian species Pleurolucina leucocyma, it is most similar to the eastern Pacific Pleurolucina undata. As in all studied lucinids, the new species possesses symbiotic bacteria housed in the ctenidia. The shell microstructure is unusual with repeated and intercalated conchiolin layers that have sublayers of 'tulip-shaped' calcareous spherules. Predatory drillings by naticid gastropods frequently terminate at the conchiolin layers.
A new shallow water species of the lucinid bivalve Pleurolucina is described from Curaçao in the southern Caribbean Sea and compared with known species of the genus from the western Atlantic and eastern Pacific Oceans. Although confused with the Floridian species Pleurolucina leucocyma, it is most similar to the eastern Pacific Pleurolucina undata. As in all studied lucinids, the new species possesses symbiotic bacteria housed in the ctenidia. The shell microstructure is unusual with repeated and intercalated conchiolin layers that have sublayers of 'tulip-shaped' calcareous spherules. Predatory drillings by naticid gastropods frequently terminate at the conchiolin layers.
The tropical and subtropical western Atlantic is one of the major centres of marine molluscan diversity and bivalves in the speciose family , with an estimated 46 species in this ocean, have been the focus of many studies since the discovery of their chemosymbiosis with sulphide-oxidising bacteria (e.g. Giere 1985, Fisher and Hand 1984, Frenkiel and Mouëza 1995, Frenkiel et al. 1996, Gros et al. 1998, 1998, 2012). Nonetheless, new species from both shallow and deep water are still discovered and new genera identified (Taylor and Glover 2009, Taylor et al. 2013). Additionally, within the area there are several cryptic species with narrower ranges nestled among supposedly widespread species (Huber 2015, Taylor and Glover submitted. Distributional data for western Atlantic lucinids indicates that although some are widespread, others have more restricted ranges. A recurring pattern is of congeneric pairs, one largely restricted to the Gulf of Mexico and Florida and the other with a more southerly Caribbean range as exemplified by and (Taylor and Glover submitted). This dual distribution is similar to that proposed by Petuch (1982) as a relict of the Caloosahatchee-Gatunian pattern dating from the Pliocene but possibly inherited by present day taxa. Additionally, in the eastern Pacific, there are lucinids closely similar morphologically and genetically to those of the western Atlantic and presumably separated by the rise of the Central American Isthmus around 3.5 mya. Examples of these are the pair (Atlantic) and (Pacific) (see Garfinkle 2012), and the pair (Atlantic) and (Pacific) (Taylor et al. 2011).(Dall, 1901) is a genus of small lucinids characterised by broad radial ribs. The type species, Dall, 1886, first described from off the Florida Keys, is documented as having a distribution from North Carolina to Colombia including Yucatan Peninsula (Britton 1970, Vokes and Vokes 1983, Huber 2015). Two other species, Britton, 1972 and (Dall, 1886), are known from the western Atlantic (Britton 1972), while three further species are recorded from the Eastern Pacific (Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012). During field sampling in shallow seagrass around Curaçao in May 2015 we collected a that we recognised as similar to, but likely distinct from, . Further research showed this to be an undescribed species more widely distributed in the southern Caribbean and confounded with . An apparent high incidence of failed naticiddrill holes focused attention on the shell microstructure revealing intercalated organic layers. Thought to be related to or (Britton 1972, Bretsky 1976) and included by Taylor et al. (2011) in the subfamily , no species has previously been included in molecular analyses.We describe this new from Curaçao in comparison with other western Atlantic and Eastern Pacific species, detail its phylogenetic position and illustrate its unusual shell microstructure with calcified conchiolin layers.
Material and methods
Samples of the new species were collected in southern Curaçao – location below. Details of ctenidia and sperm were studied using critical point dried glutaraldehyde-fixed specimens. Shells, microstructure and anatomy were imaged using a Quanta FEI 650 FEG scanning electron microscope. Comparative shell material was studied in USNM and NHMUK.Institutional abbreviationsFMNHField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USAMCZMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, USAMNHNMuséum national d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, FranceRMNHRijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Histoire, Leiden, NetherlandsNHMUKThe Natural History Museum, London, UKSBMNHSanta Barbara Museum of Natural History, USAUSNMUnited States National Museum of Natural History, USAOther abbreviationsHshell heightLshell lengthLVleft valvePIprotoconch I lengthPIIprotoconch II lengthRVright valveSEMscanning electron microscopyTtumidity single valve
Systematics
Family Fleming, 1828 Subfamily Fleming, 1828
Dall, 1901Olsson & Harbison, 1953. Type species, by original designation,
Type species.
Dall, 1886, by original designation. Recent, western Atlantic Ocean. Gender feminine.
Diagnosis.
Shell small, L to 27 mm ( usually less than 10 mm), subcircular to ovate, generally higher than long, inflated to highly inflated. Sculpture of 4–6 broad radial ribs separated by broad sulci, sometimes absent in adult shells, crossed by closely-spaced, often terraced, commarginal lamellae. Lunule deeply excavated to shallow. Ventral margin finely beaded. Hinge: RV with two cardinal teeth, posterior-most sometimes bifid, anterior and posterior lateral teeth present; LV with two cardinal teeth, anterior smaller, with anterior and posterior lateral teeth. Anterior adductor muscle scar relatively short, broad, separate from pallial line for about ½ to 2/3 of length, pallial line entire.
Western Atlantic: northern Florida to Brazil ( Espirito Santo, Rios 1994). East Pacific: Baja California Mexico to Ecuador, Galapagos Islands (Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012).
Geological range.
Early Oligocene to Recent. (Dall, 1898) is a distinctive, laterally compressed species from the Late Pliocene to mid-Pleistocene of Florida. It was made type species of the new genus by Olsson and Harbison (1954) but other than the lateral compression it is similar in most characters to . From Miocene deposits of Ecuador Olsson (1964) described with Olsson, 1964 as type species. This has the shape and radial folds typical of species and may be an antecedent.(Dall, 1903) from the Pliocene Bowden Formation of Jamaica (Woodring 1925: 121, pl. 16, figs 4-6) resembles the living . From the same deposit, (Dall, 1903) (Woodring 1925: 120, pl. 16, figs 2, 3) is similar to . A species described as (Dockery 1982, pl. 19, fig 4) from the Early Oligocene, Vicksburg Group, Mississippi, USA, has characters of but with only two radial folds. From the same deposits,
Dockery (1982 pl. 20, figs 11–12) resembles the Recent .
Relationships.
From morphological characters of the shells, species are usually regarded as being related to s.s. or (Britton 1972, Bretsky 1976). below is the only member of the genus yet to be included in molecular analyses and results (Taylor et al. submitted) show that it groups within the , close to , in a subclade of and species.
Remarks.
In the absence of molecular evidence, other than for , our concept of embraces a range of shell morphologies from species like , and that have prominent radial ribs, through the less ribbed and , to the small that has a rounded shell lacking radial ribs. Nevertheless, they are all rather inflated with similar dentition, anterior adductor muscle scars and beaded inner margins.n. sp.http://zoobank.org/D9916BAC-D208-4A5B-8499-6FE1B5ADC3BBFigs 1
, 2
, 3
, 4
, 5
Figure 1.
sp. n. A–C Holotype NHMUK 20160338 exterior of right and interior of right and left valves L 8.8 mm. D–P Paratypes. NHMUK 20160339 dorsal view L 7.6 mm. E Exterior of left valve L 7.7 mm. F Interior of right valve L 6.3 mm. G Exterior of right valve L 7.9 mm. Hinge area of right valve L 8.6 mm. I Exterior of left valve L 63 mm. J, K Interiors of right and left valves L 5.0 mm. Dorsal view showing lunule. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. M, N Details of hinge teeth of J, K. O Protoconch. Scale bar = 100 µm. P Detail of microsculpture. Scale bar = 20 µm.
Figure 2.
Outline drawings of shell interiors of A
and B
.
Figure 3.
, general anatomy, ctenidia, bacteria, oocytes and sperm. A Right side, with mantle removed, right demibranch and extended foot stained with methylene blue L 7 mm B Left demibranch and foot, critical point dried preparation. Scale bar = 1 mm C Cut section to show general anatomy, stained with methylene blue L 8 mm D Transverse section through single ctenidial demibranch. Scale bar = 100 µm E Surface of bacteriocytes and intercalary cells on lateral view of a ctenidial filament. Scale bar = 15 µm F Spirochaete bacteria on surface of bacteriocytes. Scale bar = 2 µm G, Symbiotic bacteria contained in bacteriocyte. Scale bar = 5 µm I Developing oocytes. Scale bar = 500 µm J, K Sperm. Scale bars = 5, 2 µm respectively. aa anterior adductor muscle bz bacteriocyte zone cz ciliated zone dg digestive gland f foot lp labial palps me mantle edge ov ovary with oocyctes pa posterior adductor r rectum rd right demibranch st stomach tm thickened mantle ventral to anterior adductor muscle.
Figure 4.
Shell microstructure of . A Fractured section of shell margin showing major notch growth halt and conchiolin layer. Scale bar = 400 µm B Fractured section showing succession of shell layers. Shell exterior at top. Scale bar = 100 µm C Conchiolin layer with regular bands of spherulites. Scale bar = 40 µm D Individual spherulite. Scale bar = 2 µm E Adjacent spherulites embedded in conchiolin with narrow channels between layers. Scale bar = 5 µm F Single spherulites with channels below and above. Scale bar = 5 µm. cl crossed lamellar layer co conchiolin layer cp composite prismatic layer ip irregular prismatic layer p periostracum sp spherulitic prismatic layer.
Figure 5.
Failed and multiple drill holes in shells of . A
L = 6.8 mm B
L = 9.8 mm C
L =7.8 mm D
SEM of failed drill hole terminating at conchiolin layer. Scale bar = 1.0 mm.
::
Type material.
Holotype: 1 whole shell L 8.8, H 8.5 T 3.2 mm (NHMUK 20160338), southwestern Curaçao, channel into Spaanse Water, opposite Hyatt Resort, . BivAToL stn Cur-5-15-009, 22 May 2015.Paratypes: 92 valves (NHMUK 20160339), 2 paired valves (RMNH 5003991–50003992), 3 paired valves (FMNH344698), 2 paired valves (USNM 1411553). Same locality as holotype.
Other material.
19 ethanol preserved specimens (NHMUK), same locality as holotype.
Description.
Shell subovate, slightly anteriorly extended, L to 9.6 mm, H to 9.7 mm, H/L 0.99, moderately inflated, sculpture of flat, closely spaced commarginal lamellae, with four prominent, broad ribs with interspaces variable in width, but always narrower than ribs themselves; microsculpture of tight rows of shallow pits (Fig. 1 P). Umbones low, situated on midline. Anterior dorsal area arcuate. Protoconch: PI 217 µm, PI + PII 228 µm, PII a narrow rim with fine increments (Fig. 1 O). Lunule short, semicircular, slightly impressed. Ligament short, set in shallow resilifer. Hinge teeth: LV with two cardinal teeth; a robust anterior lateral tooth and smaller posterior lateral. RV with a single large cardinal tooth and anterior and posterior lateral teeth. Anterior adductor muscle scar short, broad, widely divergent from pallial line (60–70 µm) for about half of length (Fig. 2 A), posterior scar ovate; pallial line entire, pallial blood vessel scar sometimes visible. Shell margin finely beaded, sinuate with anterior sinus deeper. Shell within pallial line often patchily eroded to expose inner shell layers. Colour grey-white.sp. n. A–C Holotype NHMUK 20160338 exterior of right and interior of right and left valves L 8.8 mm. D–P Paratypes. NHMUK 20160339 dorsal view L 7.6 mm. E Exterior of left valve L 7.7 mm. F Interior of right valve L 6.3 mm. G Exterior of right valve L 7.9 mm. Hinge area of right valve L 8.6 mm. I Exterior of left valve L 63 mm. J, K Interiors of right and left valves L 5.0 mm. Dorsal view showing lunule. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. M, N Details of hinge teeth of J, K. O Protoconch. Scale bar = 100 µm. P Detail of microsculpture. Scale bar = 20 µm.Outline drawings of shell interiors of A
and B
.
Anatomy.
General anatomy resembles most other described lucinids (Fig. 3). Mantle fusion ventral to the posterior apertures is very short. Foot short and broad when retracted but can be vermiform when extended (Fig. 3 A) with a small heel. Visceral pouches absent. Distinct mantle gills are absent but the inner mantle ventral to the anterior adductor muscle is thickened (Fig. 3 C) and may be a respiratory area with blood space as seen in other lucinids (Taylor and Glover 2000). Labial palps are very short. In common with all other studied , has ctenidia comprising inner demibranchs only; these were pink in life, large, thick and occupying much of the mantle cavity (Fig. 3 B). Ctenidial filaments are approx. 40 µm thick and 380 µm deep with a narrow 45 µm ciliated zone and a deep bacteriocyte zone (Fig. 3 D). Bacteriocytes were packed with ‘potato-shaped’ bacteria 3–5 µm long and 1.5–2.0 µm wide (Figs 3 G, H). The surface of the microvilli-covered bacteriocytes and intercalary cells were colonised by abundant spirochaetes 2.5 µm long and 0.2 µm wide (Fig. 3 F) similar to those rePageBreakPageBreakported by Ball et al. (2009) from (Reeve, 1850). In comparison the symbiotic bacteria of collected at the same time and same habitat were longer and rod shaped, 8–10 µm in length and approx. 1 µm wide., general anatomy, ctenidia, bacteria, oocytes and sperm. A Right side, with mantle removed, right demibranch and extended foot stained with methylene blue L 7 mm B Left demibranch and foot, critical point dried preparation. Scale bar = 1 mm C Cut section to show general anatomy, stained with methylene blue L 8 mm D Transverse section through single ctenidial demibranch. Scale bar = 100 µm E Surface of bacteriocytes and intercalary cells on lateral view of a ctenidial filament. Scale bar = 15 µm F Spirochaete bacteria on surface of bacteriocytes. Scale bar = 2 µm G, Symbiotic bacteria contained in bacteriocyte. Scale bar = 5 µm I Developing oocytes. Scale bar = 500 µm J, K Sperm. Scale bars = 5, 2 µm respectively. aa anterior adductor muscle bz bacteriocyte zone cz ciliated zone dg digestive gland f foot lp labial palps me mantle edge ov ovary with oocyctes pa posterior adductor r rectum rd right demibranch st stomach tm thickened mantle ventral to anterior adductor muscle.The sperm of were 9 µm long and 1.2 µm wide at the base, tapering and curved distally (Figs 3 J, K). From the same locality, sperm of were shorter, 4.8–5 µm and 1–1.2 µm wide with blunt tips. Oocytes of were approx. 200 µm in diameter (Fig. 3 I). Comparative sperm data is available for a few other western Atlantic lucinids (Bigatti et al. 2004); sperm of were 14–15 µm long, tapering with a width of 0.8 µm; were cylindrical, slightly curved, 7.5 µm long and 1–1.2 µm wide at base and were 15.5 µm long, with curved tapering heads and 1.1 µm wide at the posterior.
Shell microstructure.
Within a very thin (ca 1 µm) periostracum, has a basic four layered shell (Figs 4 A,B); an outer composite prismatic layer, followed inwards by a thin crossed-lamellar layer, then a thicker layer of irregular spherulitic prisms and within the pallial line a complex crossed-lamellar layer with sublayers of irregular prisms. The shell layers are interrupted by sheets of conchiolin around 20–90 µm in thickness, each with repeated sublayers of small discrete ‘tulip-shaped’ calcified spherulites approx. 5 µm in diameter (Figs 4 D, F). Each spherulite is joined to those of the layer below with a narrow (0.5 µm) semicalcified channel through the conchiolin (Figs 4 E, F). At the shell surface, the conchiolin sheets correspond to major depositional halts (Fig. 4 A) visible as notches in the shell with the conchiolin appearing contiguous with the invaginated periostracum. In each shell there may be between 1–5 of such sheets.Shell microstructure of . A Fractured section of shell margin showing major notch growth halt and conchiolin layer. Scale bar = 400 µm B Fractured section showing succession of shell layers. Shell exterior at top. Scale bar = 100 µm C Conchiolin layer with regular bands of spherulites. Scale bar = 40 µm D Individual spherulite. Scale bar = 2 µm E Adjacent spherulites embedded in conchiolin with narrow channels between layers. Scale bar = 5 µm F Single spherulites with channels below and above. Scale bar = 5 µm. cl crossed lamellar layer co conchiolin layer cp composite prismatic layer ip irregular prismatic layer p periostracum sp spherulitic prismatic layer.Drill holes in produced by predatory naticid gastropods were observed with full penetration in 14 out of 114 single valves, but with 12 records of PageBreakPageBreakPageBreakincomplete drill holes that terminated at an internal conchiolin layer (Fig. 5). In one shell there were three failed drills and in another two failures before successful penetration. Incidences of apparent multiple completed drill holes in dead shells may have resulted from post-mortem degradation of organic layers in failed drill holes.Failed and multiple drill holes in shells of . A
L = 6.8 mm B
L = 9.8 mm C
L =7.8 mm D
SEM of failed drill hole terminating at conchiolin layer. Scale bar = 1.0 mm.Similar conchiolin calcified sheets were identified in (Figs 6 A, B) and (Figs 6 C–E) but not in (2 shells examined) or (2 shells examined). Also conchiolin sheets with multiple layers of calcareous spherules were observed in from the Florida Keys (Figs 6 F,G), apparently confined to the inner shell layer within the pallial line. This is distinct from the calcified periostracum of this species (Fig. 6 H) as described by Taylor et al. (2004). No conchiolin sheets were observed in a single examined. For comparison, the repeated conchiolin sheets reported in species by Ishikawa and Kase (2007) were studied in from the Philippines. These sheets were approx. 10-15 µm thick and only lightly calcified with sporadic spherulitic crystal aggregations (Figs 6 I-K) with no multiple sub-layers.
Figure 6.
Shell microstructure of other species , , and . A
Guadeloupe, fractured section with prominent calcified conchiolin layer, periostracum at base. Scale bar = 20 µm B
, detail of conchiolin layer with lines of calcareous spherulites. Scale bar = 20 µm C
Baja California, fractured section with thin conchiolin layer Scale bar = 200 µm D
, detail of conchiolin layer with spherulites. Scale bar = 20 µm E
, single spherulites embedded in conchiolin. Scale bar = 3 µm F
Florida Keys, calcified conchiolin layer. Scale bar = 20 µm G
, single spherulite. Scale bar = 2 µm
, section of periostracum with calcareous granules. Shell interior to top. Scale bar = 20 µm I
Philippines, fractured section with conchiolin layer. Scale bar = 200 µm J
detail of conchiolin layer with calcareous aggregates. Scale bar = 50 µm K
detail of calcareous aggregate. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Shell microstructure of other species , , and . A
Guadeloupe, fractured section with prominent calcified conchiolin layer, periostracum at base. Scale bar = 20 µm B
, detail of conchiolin layer with lines of calcareous spherulites. Scale bar = 20 µm C
Baja California, fractured section with thin conchiolin layer Scale bar = 200 µm D
, detail of conchiolin layer with spherulites. Scale bar = 20 µm E
, single spherulites embedded in conchiolin. Scale bar = 3 µm F
Florida Keys, calcified conchiolin layer. Scale bar = 20 µm G
, single spherulite. Scale bar = 2 µm
, section of periostracum with calcareous granules. Shell interior to top. Scale bar = 20 µm I
Philippines, fractured section with conchiolin layer. Scale bar = 200 µm J
detail of conchiolin layer with calcareous aggregates. Scale bar = 50 µm K
detail of calcareous aggregate. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Habitat.
is an intertidal to shallow subtidal species collected from sand amongst seagrass rhizomes (largely , sp.) in contrast to that is usually recorded from deeper water, for example 30–180 m around the Florida Keys (Britton 1970). Records of from Atlantic Panama (USNM below) are also from shallow water seagrass habitats. At Curaçao it co-occurred with several other lucinid species: (d’Orbigny, 1845), (C.B. Adams, 1845), Link, 1807, (Linnaeus, 1758), J. & W. Gibson-Smith, 1982 and (d’Orbigny, 1845).Southern Caribbean: Panama (USNM 759784; 620716, 759825) Colombia -Taganga (Daccarett and Bossio 2011), Curaçao. The distribution of in the southern Caribbean is uncertain but it may be restricted to the southwestern area. There have been no records from the Antilles and intensive sampling of molluscs around Guadeloupe by Muséum national d’Histoire Naturelle (KARUBENTHOS 2012, 2015) recorded only and (Taylor and Glover submitted). Similarly, only was recorded from a recent survey of the marine molluscan fauna of French Guiana (MNHN - GUYANE 2014).
Etymology.
Named for Elizabeth (Liz) Harper, University of Cambridge, bivalve researcher, colleague and friend, who helped collect the new species.
Comparison with other species.
(Fig. 7) was thought to be widespread across the tropical Western Atlantic but we now consider it to be restricted to Florida and the Gulf of Mexico with the southern Caribbean records representing . The new species differs from (mean L 6.2 mm, H 7.4 mm, H/L 1.13) in being larger, less inflated and usually longer than high in the adult (Fig. 8). The radial folds are usually lower and the anterior adductor muscle scar is shorter and more divergent from the pallial line (Fig. 2 B). In shape and sculpture, it is most similar to the somewhat larger (Figs 9 E-G) (mean L 15.1 mm, H 15 mm, H/L 0.95) from the eastern Pacific, Gulf of California, intertidal zone to 60 m (Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012).
Figure 7.
. A–C
Dall, 1881 lectotype MCZ 7986, exterior, interior and dorsal view of right valve, L 5.7 mm, H 6.6 mm D, E
paralectotype USNM 83140, exterior of left valve and interior of right valve, L 4.8 mm, H 5.5 mm F–K,
USNM 446563 Eolis Station 368, off Ajax Reef, Florida F Exterior of left valve, L 5.1 mm G Left valve of juvenile shell, L 3.1 mm Lateral view of left valve, L 5.1 mm. I Interior of left valve, L 5.5 mm J Interior of right valve, L 5.5 mm K Protoconch, scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 8.
Bivariate height/length plots comparing with , and . Length and height in millimetres.
Figure 9.
Other species. A, B
Britton, 1972, exterior and interior of left valve Guadeloupe station GD 69 (MNHN), L 9.1 mm C, D
(Dall, 1886) exterior of left valve (L 4.9 mm) and interior of right valve (L 5.2 mm), USNM 446178, Eolis stn 48, off Miami, Florida, 110 m E–G
(Carpenter, 1865) exterior of left valve and interiors of right and left valves, NUMUK 1915.15.273 ‘California’, L 11.0 mm
(Lowe, 1935), exterior of right valve and interiors of right and left valves SBMNH 141511, Baja California, NE of Isla Danzante, Mexico, L 11 mm K–M
Coan & Valentich-Scott, 2012, holotype, exterior of left valve and interior of left and right valves, SBMNH 149647, Baja California, Los Frailes, Mexico, L 9.5 mm.
. A–C
Dall, 1881 lectotype MCZ 7986, exterior, interior and dorsal view of right valve, L 5.7 mm, H 6.6 mm D, E
paralectotype USNM 83140, exterior of left valve and interior of right valve, L 4.8 mm, H 5.5 mm F–K,
USNM 446563 Eolis Station 368, off Ajax Reef, Florida F Exterior of left valve, L 5.1 mm G Left valve of juvenile shell, L 3.1 mm Lateral view of left valve, L 5.1 mm. I Interior of left valve, L 5.5 mm J Interior of right valve, L 5.5 mm K Protoconch, scale bar = 100 µm.Bivariate height/length plots comparing with , and . Length and height in millimetres.Other less similar species are: (Figs 9 A, B) an offshore to deep water species (to 300 m) from the southern Caribbean (Cuba, Lesser Antilles) that reaches PageBreakabout 12 mm in length and resembles the eastern Pacific . Compared with other , the sculpture of broad radial folds is less pronounced and the commarginal lamellae are widely spaced and prominent. (Figs 9 C, D) lives in deeper water to 200 m from the Florida Keys to Brazil. The shell reaches about 6–7 mm in length and is rounded in outline, with a shallow radial anterior sulcus and prominent close commarginal lamellae, sometimes separated by deep interspaces. It does not closely resemble other but shares some shell features including dentition and adductor scar shape. The larger (Figs 9 H–J) is known from shallow water to 150 m and ranges from Baja California to EcPageBreakuador and Galapagos Islands. The sculpture of broad prominent commarginal lamellae and absence of prominent radial folds distinguish it from other . Lastly, (Figs 9 K–M) is known from the intertidal zone to 183 m in the Gulf of California; it is distinguished by the highly inflated shell and closely spaced, low commarginal lamellae with four to five radial folds and resembles the extinct late Pliocene – mid-Pleistocene Floridian species .Other species. A, B
Britton, 1972, exterior and interior of left valve Guadeloupe station GD 69 (MNHN), L 9.1 mm C, D
(Dall, 1886) exterior of left valve (L 4.9 mm) and interior of right valve (L 5.2 mm), USNM 446178, Eolis stn 48, off Miami, Florida, 110 m E–G
(Carpenter, 1865) exterior of left valve and interiors of right and left valves, NUMUK 1915.15.273 ‘California’, L 11.0 mm
(Lowe, 1935), exterior of right valve and interiors of right and left valves SBMNH 141511, Baja California, NE of Isla Danzante, Mexico, L 11 mm K–M
Coan & Valentich-Scott, 2012, holotype, exterior of left valve and interior of left and right valves, SBMNH 149647, Baja California, Los Frailes, Mexico, L 9.5 mm.
Discussion
is a genus of seven living species from the tropical to subtropical western Atlantic and eastern Pacific with none recognised from the eastern Atlantic or Indo-West Pacific. In that respect, it is similar to (Garfinkle 2012) and that share similar distributions. In the western Atlantic, the most similar species to the southern Caribbean is from Gulf of Mexico and Florida. This distributional pattern of northern and southern species pairs is seen in ( and ), ( and ) and ( and ) (see Taylor and Glover submitted). Cognate pairs of bivalves have been recognised from morphology and/or molecules on either side of the central American Isthmus (Marko 2002, Marko and Moran 2009). Although molecular confirmation is lacking, is similar in shell form to , resembles and perhaps is a sister species to .An interesting and unusual feature of is the repeated conchiolin sheets that are calcified with layers of embedded spherules. A model of conchiolin sheet formation in another lucinid genus, , was proposed by Ishikawa and Kase (2007 fig. 7). Periodically, normal shell secretion of outer, middle and inner shell layers stops and a conchiolin sheet is secreted across the inside of the shell from the margin and extending within the pallial line. This break in normal calcification is marked by a distinct notch at the shell surface. Calcification then resumes with secretion of normal shell layers. Conchiolin layer formation in is essentially similar but each layer is thicker with repeated sublayers of aragonitic spherules. The narrow channels linking successive spherule layers suggest some sort of original tissue connection to the cells of the mantle surface.Conchiolin layers within the shell have been recorded in several bivalve families but those in the have attracted most attention because of the supposed resistance to predation by drilling gastropods evidenced by the high incidence of failed borings that terminate at the organic layers (e.g. Lewy and Samtleben 1979, Harper 1994). Alternatively, organic layers may enhance resistance to shell dissolution, endolithic organisms or shell breakage (Anderson 1992, Harper 1994, Kardon 1998). In contrast to where the conchiolin layers are secreted episodically, the layers in are secreted continuously as a sublayer of normal shell formation. In the conchiolin layer is calcified with cone-shaped spherPageBreakules approx. 8 µm in diameter (Lewy and Samtleben 1979 figs 5A–F). The organic layers of are similar in position and mode of formation to those recorded for species of (Ishikawa and Kase 2007), but are much more highly calcified. spp also show a high incidence of multiple drill holes with many terminating at the organic layers (Ishikawa and Kase 2007). and are not closely related among the and the occurrence of conchiolin layers in other lucinids seems to be sporadic and certainly absent in many genera although no comprehensive study has been made. Nonetheless, calcified conchiolin layers do occur in some individuals of that is more closely related to . It is tempting to regard the conchiolin layers as an adaptation conferring some resistance to shell drilling predation but, as argued in the case of (e.g. Kardon 1998), the layers may be an exaptation having first developed with some other function such as resistance to shell dissolution or enhancement of mechanical strength.