Literature DB >> 27852908

Final Fusion After Growing-Rod Treatment for Early Onset Scoliosis: Is It Really Final?

Connie Poe-Kochert1, Claire Shannon1, Jeff B Pawelek2, George H Thompson3, Christina K Hardesty1, David S Marks4, Behrooz A Akbarnia2, Richard E McCarthy5, John B Emans6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Final fusion is thought to be the end point for patients with early onset scoliosis following treatment with the use of growing rods. But is it? The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and cause of any reoperation after final fusion.
METHODS: A multicenter database of patients with early onset scoliosis was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients treated with growing rods with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after final fusion. All reoperations were recorded. Reoperation was defined as a return to the operating room for any complication related to the final fusion surgery or etiology of the spinal deformity.
RESULTS: One hundred (84%) of 119 patients met the inclusion criteria: for 38 of the patients, the etiology of scoliosis was neuromuscular; for 31, syndromic; for 22, idiopathic; and for 9, congenital. The mean age at final fusion was 12.2 years (range, 8.5 to 18.7 years). The mean follow-up after final fusion was 4.3 years (range, 2 to 11.2 years). Twenty (20%) of the patients had 30 complications requiring reoperation (57 procedures). There was a mean of 1.5 complications per patient after final fusion. Eight patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, 8 with syndromic, 4 with idiopathic, and no patient with congenital scoliosis required reoperation. Nine (9%) of the patients experienced infection (33 reoperation procedures); 6 (6%) had instrumentation failure (8 procedures); 5 (5%) had painful or prominent instrumentation (6 procedures); 3 (3%) each had coronal deformity (3 procedures), pseudarthrosis (3 procedures), or sagittal deformity (3 procedures); and 1 (1%) had progressive crankshaft chest wall deformity requiring a thoracoplasty (1 procedure).
CONCLUSIONS: A higher-than-anticipated percentage of patients treated with growing rods required unplanned reoperation following final fusion. Long-term follow-up after final fusion is necessary to determine true final results. Patients and parents need to be counseled regarding the possibility of further surgery after final fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27852908     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

Review 1.  In Patients with Early-Onset Scoliosis, Can Growing Rods Be Removed Without Further Instrumentation? An Evidenced-Based Review.

Authors:  Tony S Shen; William Schairer; Roger Widmann
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-02-27

Review 2.  Wound-Related Complication in Growth-Friendly Spinal Surgeries for Early-Onset Scoliosis-Literature Review.

Authors:  Michał Latalski; Grzegorz Starobrat; Marek Fatyga; Ireneusz Sowa; Magdalena Wójciak; Joanna Wessely-Szponder; Sławomir Dresler; Anna Danielewicz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Is Growth-friendly Surgical Treatment Superior to One-stage Posterior Spinal Fusion in 9- to 11-year-old Children with Congenital Scoliosis?

Authors:  Liang Xu; Xu Sun; Changzhi Du; Qingshuang Zhou; Benlong Shi; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Minimum 2-Year Experience with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Kenneth Man Chee Cheung; Jia-Liang Lin; Hai-Ming Jin; Dong Chen; Xiang-Yang Wang; Jie Zhao; Kenny Yat Hong Kwan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-03-26

5.  Two-stage posterior spinal fusion for early-onset scoliosis: Two case reports.

Authors:  Masashi Uehara; Jun Takahashi; Shugo Kuraishi; Shota Ikegami; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Hiroki Oba; Takashi Takizawa; Ryo Munakata; Michihiko Koseki; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Identifying complications and failure modes of innovative growing rod configurations using the (hybrid) magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) and the spring distraction system (SDS).

Authors:  Justin V C Lemans; Casper S Tabeling; René M Castelein; Moyo C Kruyt
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.