Literature DB >> 27852685

Evaluating the Experience of Children With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents Taking Part in an Artificial Pancreas Clinical Trial Over Multiple Days in a Diabetes Camp Setting.

Alda Troncone1, Riccardo Bonfanti2, Dario Iafusco3, Ivana Rabbone4, Alberto Sabbion5, Riccardo Schiaffini6, Alfonso Galderisi7, Marco Marigliano5, Novella Rapini8, Andrea Rigamonti2, Davide Tinti4, Valeria Vallone9, Angela Zanfardino3, Federico Boscari9, Simone Del Favero10, Silvia Galasso9, Giordano Lanzola11, Mirko Messori12, Federico Di Palma12, Roberto Visentin10, Roberta Calore10, Yenny Leal10, Lalo Magni12, Eleonora Losiouk11, Daniel Chernavvsky13, Silvana Quaglini11, Claudio Cobelli10, Daniela Bruttomesso9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of children with type 1 diabetes and their parents taking part in an artificial pancreas (AP) clinical trial during a 7-day summer camp. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A semistructured interview, composed of 14 questions based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was conducted at the end of the clinical trial. Participants also completed the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ, parent version) and the AP Acceptance Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Thirty children, aged 5-9 years, and their parents completed the study. A content analysis of the interviews showed that parents were focused on understanding the mechanisms, risks, and benefits of the new device, whereas the children were focused on the novelty of the new system. The parents' main concerns about adopting the new system seemed related to the quality of glucose control. The mean scores of DTSQ subscales indicated general parents' satisfaction (44.24 ± 5.99, range 32-53) and trustful views of diabetes control provided by the new system (7.8 ± 2.2, range 3-12). The AP Acceptance Questionnaire revealed that most parents considered the AP easy to use (70.5%), intended to use it long term (94.0%), and felt that it was apt to improve glucose control (67.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Participants manifested a positive attitude toward the AP. Further studies are required to explore participants' perceptions early in the AP development to individualize the new treatment as much as possible, and to tailor it to respond to their needs and values.
© 2016 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27852685     DOI: 10.2337/dc16-1073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  8 in total

1.  Artificial Pancreas in Young Children.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ohman-Hanson; Gregory P Forlenza
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Predictive hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia minimization: In-home double-blind randomized controlled evaluation in children and young adolescents.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Dan Raghinaru; Faye Cameron; B Wayne Bequette; H Peter Chase; R Paul Wadwa; David M Maahs; Emily Jost; Trang T Ly; Darrell M Wilson; Lisa Norlander; Laya Ekhlaspour; Hyojin Min; Paula Clinton; Nelly Njeru; John W Lum; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck; Bruce A Buckingham
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Psychosocial Research and Care in Diabetes: Altering Lives by Understanding Attitudes.

Authors:  Katie Weinger; Mary de Groot; William T Cefalu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  The impact of using a closed-loop system on food choices and eating practices among people with Type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study involving adults, teenagers and parents.

Authors:  J Lawton; M Blackburn; D Rankin; J Allen; F Campbell; L Leelarathna; M Tauschmann; H Thabit; M E Wilinska; R Hovorka
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Participants' Experiences of, and Views About, Daytime Use of a Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Real Life Settings: Longitudinal Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Julia Lawton; Maxine Blackburn; David Rankin; Janet M Allen; Fiona M Campbell; Lalantha Leelarathna; Martin Tauschmann; Hood Thabit; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Daniela Elleri; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Reduced burden of diabetes and improved quality of life: Experiences from unrestricted day-and-night hybrid closed-loop use in very young children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Gianluca Musolino; Klemen Dovc; Charlotte K Boughton; Martin Tauschmann; Janet M Allen; Katrin Nagl; Maria Fritsch; James Yong; Emily Metcalfe; Dominique Schaeffer; Muriel Fichelle; Ulrike Schierloh; Alena G Thiele; Daniela Abt; Harald Kojzar; Julia K Mader; Sonja Slegtenhorst; Nicole Ashcroft; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Judy Sibayan; Nathan Cohen; Craig Kollman; Sabine E Hofer; Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer; Thomas M Kapellen; Carlo L Acerini; Carine de Beaufort; Fiona Campbell; Birgit Rami-Merhar; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.866

7.  Glycemic outcomes of Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop system in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes, previously treated with Multiple Daily Injections (MiniMed 780G system in T1D individuals, previously treated with MDI).

Authors:  Goran Petrovski; Fawziya Al Khalaf; Judith Campbell; Emma Day; Douha Almajaly; Khalid Hussain; Maheen Pasha; Fareeda Umer; Manar Hamdan; Amel Khalifa
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.763

8.  Acceptance of the Artificial Pancreas: Comparing the Effect of Technology Readiness, Product Characteristics, and Social Influence Between Invited and Self-Selected Respondents.

Authors:  Tamara Oukes; Helga Blauw; Arianne C van Bon; J Hans DeVries; Ariane M von Raesfeld
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.