Literature DB >> 27852641

Does age matter? Sexual event-level analysis of age-disparate sexual partners among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) in Vancouver, Canada.

K Closson1,2, N J Lachowsky1,3,4, Z Cui1, S Shurgold1, P Sereda1, A Rich1, D M Moore1,5, E A Roth4,6, R S Hogg1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine factors associated with age-disparate sexual partners among Vancouver gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM).
METHODS: Sexually active GBM aged ≥16 years were recruited from February 2012 to February 2014. Participants self-completed a questionnaire on demographics, attitudes and sexual behaviour and substance use at last sexual event with five most recent partners. Two generalised linear mixed models identified factors associated with: (1) 'same-age' (referent), 'younger' or 'much-younger' and (2) 'same-age' (referent), 'older' or 'much-older' partners. Statistical interactions between age and HIV status were tested.
RESULTS: Participants (n=719) were predominantly gay (85.1%), White (75.0%), HIV-negative/unknown status (72.9%) with median age of 33 years (Q1,Q3: 26,47). A minority of sexual events were reported with much-older/much-younger partners (13.7%). In the multivariable models, GBM reporting older partners were more likely to be Asian or Latino, have greater Escape Motivation scores, report their partner used erectile dysfunction drugs (EDDs) and have received something for sex; compared with condom-protected insertive anal sex, participants with older partners were more likely to report condomless insertive anal sex with a serodiscordant or unknown status partner or no insertive anal sex. GBM reporting older partners were less likely to be bisexual-identified, have given something for sex and report event-level alcohol and EDD use. GBM reporting younger partners were more likely to have annual incomes >$30 000 and have met their partner online. As per significant statistical interactions, age-disparate relations were more common for younger HIV-positive and older HIV-negative GBM.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences among age-disparate partners highlight important targets for health promotion and future research. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HEALTH PROMOTION; HIV; HOMOSEXUALITY; PREVENTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27852641      PMCID: PMC5433923          DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  27 in total

1.  A scale of optimism-scepticism in the context of HIV treatments.

Authors:  P Van de Ven; J Crawford; S Kippax; S Knox; G Prestage
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2000-04

2.  Social media interventions to prevent HIV: A review of interventions and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Lai Sze Tso; Weiming Tang; Haochu Li; H Yanna Yan; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2016-06-01

3.  "We're not in Oz anymore": shifting generational perspectives and tensions of gay community, identity, and future.

Authors:  Dustin Bradley Goltz
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  2014

4.  The Predominant Relationship Between Sexual Environment Characteristics and HIV-Serodiscordant Condomless Anal Sex Among HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM).

Authors:  Nicholas S Perry; S Wade Taylor; Steven Elsesser; Steven A Safren; Conall O'Cleirigh
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-06

5.  Older partner selection, sexual risk behaviour and unrecognised HIV infection among black and Latino men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Heather A Joseph; Gary Marks; Lisa Belcher; Gregorio A Millett; Ann Stueve; Trista A Bingham; Jennifer Lauby
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Rates of disease progression by baseline CD4 cell count and viral load after initiating triple-drug therapy.

Authors:  R S Hogg; B Yip; K J Chan; E Wood; K J Craib; M V O'Shaughnessy; J S Montaner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Expectancies of sexual "escape" and sexual risk among drug and alcohol-involved gay and bisexual men.

Authors:  D J McKirnan; P A Vanable; D G Ostrow; B Hope
Journal:  J Subst Abuse       Date:  2001

8.  Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rachel K Jewkes; Kristin Dunkle; Mzikazi Nduna; Nwabisa Shai
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Homosexual men in Australia: population, distribution and HIV prevalence.

Authors:  Garrett Prestage; Jason Ferris; Jeffrey Grierson; Rachel Thorpe; Iryna Zablotska; John Imrie; Anthony Smith; Andrew E Grulich
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.706

10.  Risks for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among Asian men who have sex with men in Vancouver, British Columbia: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Thiha Maung Maung; Becky Chen; David M Moore; Keith Chan; Steve Kanters; Warren Michelow; Robert S Hogg; Nadine Nakamura; Wayne Robert; Reka Gustafson; Mark Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  Consensual Non-Monogamy Relationship Rules Among Young Gay and Bisexual Men: A Dyadic Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  J L Stewart; Christopher B Stults; Annie Ristuccia
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.