| Literature DB >> 27852639 |
Ann E Vandenberg1,2,3, Camille P Vaughan1,2,3, Melissa Stevens1,2,3, Susan N Hastings4,5, James Powers6,7, Alayne Markland1,2,8, Ula Hwang9,10, William Hung9,11, Katharina V Echt1,2,3.
Abstract
QUALITY PROBLEM OR ISSUE: Clinical decision support (CDS) may improve prescribing for older adults in the Emergency Department (ED) if adopted by providers. INITIAL ASSESSMENT: Existing prescribing order entry processes were mapped at an initial Veterans Administration Medical Center site, demonstrating cognitive burden, effort and safety concerns. CHOICE OF SOLUTION: Geriatric order sets incorporating 2012 Beers guidelines and including geriatric prescribing advice and prepopulated order options were developed. IMPLEMENTATION: Geriatric order sets were implemented at two sites as part of the multicomponent 'Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Veterans Discharged from the Emergency Department' quality improvement initiative. EVALUATION: Facilitators and barriers to order sets use at the two sites were evaluated. Phone interviews were conducted with two provider groups (n = 20), those 'EQUiPPED' with the interventions (n = 10, 5 at each site) and Comparison providers who were only exposed to order sets through a clickable option on the ED order menu within the patient's medical record (n = 10, 5 at each site). All providers were asked about order set 'use' and 'usefulness'. Users (n = 11) were asked about 'usability'. LESSONS LEARNED: Order set adopters described 'usefulness' in terms of 'safety' and 'efficiency', whereas order set consultants and order set non-users described 'usefulness' in terms of 'information' or 'training'. Provider 'autonomy', 'comfort' level with existing tools, and 'learning curve' were stated as barriers to use.Entities:
Keywords: appropriateness; elderly < specific populations; emergency care < setting of care; qualitative methods < general methodology; quality improvement < quality management; under-use and over-use < appropriate healthcare
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27852639 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Qual Health Care ISSN: 1353-4505 Impact factor: 2.038