Literature DB >> 27852639

Improving geriatric prescribing in the ED: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to clinical decision support tool use.

Ann E Vandenberg1,2,3, Camille P Vaughan1,2,3, Melissa Stevens1,2,3, Susan N Hastings4,5, James Powers6,7, Alayne Markland1,2,8, Ula Hwang9,10, William Hung9,11, Katharina V Echt1,2,3.   

Abstract

QUALITY PROBLEM OR ISSUE: Clinical decision support (CDS) may improve prescribing for older adults in the Emergency Department (ED) if adopted by providers. INITIAL ASSESSMENT: Existing prescribing order entry processes were mapped at an initial Veterans Administration Medical Center site, demonstrating cognitive burden, effort and safety concerns. CHOICE OF SOLUTION: Geriatric order sets incorporating 2012 Beers guidelines and including geriatric prescribing advice and prepopulated order options were developed. IMPLEMENTATION: Geriatric order sets were implemented at two sites as part of the multicomponent 'Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Veterans Discharged from the Emergency Department' quality improvement initiative. EVALUATION: Facilitators and barriers to order sets use at the two sites were evaluated. Phone interviews were conducted with two provider groups (n = 20), those 'EQUiPPED' with the interventions (n = 10, 5 at each site) and Comparison providers who were only exposed to order sets through a clickable option on the ED order menu within the patient's medical record (n = 10, 5 at each site). All providers were asked about order set 'use' and 'usefulness'. Users (n = 11) were asked about 'usability'. LESSONS LEARNED: Order set adopters described 'usefulness' in terms of 'safety' and 'efficiency', whereas order set consultants and order set non-users described 'usefulness' in terms of 'information' or 'training'. Provider 'autonomy', 'comfort' level with existing tools, and 'learning curve' were stated as barriers to use.
CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying efficiency advantages and communicating safety benefit over preexisting practices and tools may improve adoption of CDS in ED and in other settings of care.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  appropriateness; elderly < specific populations; emergency care < setting of care; qualitative methods < general methodology; quality improvement < quality management; under-use and over-use < appropriate healthcare

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27852639     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  3 in total

1.  Clinician Acceptance of Order Sets for Pain Management: A Survey in Two Urban Hospitals.

Authors:  Yifan Liu; Haijing Hao; Mohit M Sharma; Yonaka Harris; Jean Scofi; Richard Trepp; Brenna Farmer; Jessica S Ancker; Yiye Zhang
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  An Interdisciplinary Academic Detailing Approach to Decrease Inappropriate Medication Prescribing by Physician Residents for Older Veterans Treated in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Jason M Moss; William E Bryan; Loren M Wilkerson; Heather A King; George L Jackson; Ryan K Owenby; Courtney H Van Houtven; Melissa B Stevens; James Powers; Camille P Vaughan; William W Hung; Ula Hwang; Alayne D Markland; Richard Sloane; William Knaack; Susan Nicole Hastings
Journal:  J Pharm Pract       Date:  2017-12-25

3.  Does increased implementation support improve community clinics' guideline-concordant care? Results of a mixed methods, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Rachel Gold; Arwen Bunce; Stuart Cowburn; James V Davis; Joan C Nelson; Christine A Nelson; Elisabeth Hicks; Deborah J Cohen; Michael A Horberg; Gerardo Melgar; James W Dearing; Janet Seabrook; Ned Mossman; Joanna Bulkley
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 7.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.