Literature DB >> 27852184

Factors associated with quality of care for patients with pancreatic cancer in Australia.

Elizabeth A Burmeister1, Dianne L O'Connell2, Susan J Jordan3, David Goldstein4, Neil Merrett5, David K Wyld6, Vanessa L Beesley3, Helen M Gooden7, Monika Janda8, Rachel E Neale3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a composite score for the quality of care for patients with pancreatic cancer in Australia; to determine whether it was affected by patient and health service-related factors; to assess whether the score and survival were correlated. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: We reviewed medical records of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer during July 2009 - June 2011 and notified to the Queensland and New South Wales cancer registries. DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were allocated proportional quality of care scores based on indicators derived from a Delphi process, ranging from 0 (lowest) to 1 (highest quality care). Associations between patient and health service-related factors and the score were tested by linear regression, and associations between the score and survival with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.
RESULTS: Proportional quality of care scores were assigned to 1571 patients. Scores for patients living in rural areas were significantly lower than for those in major cities (adjusted difference, 11%; 95% CI, 8-13%); they were higher for patients in the least socio-economically disadvantaged areas (v most disadvantaged areas: 8% higher; 95% CI, 6-11%), who were younger, had better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, or who first presented to a hospital with a high pancreatic case volume. Higher scores were associated with improved survival; after adjusting for patient-related factors, each 10 percentage point increase in the score reduced the risk of dying by 6% (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.97).
CONCLUSION: Geographic category of residence may influence the quality of care received by patients with pancreatic cancer, and survival could be improved if they received optimal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27852184     DOI: 10.5694/mja16.00567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  3 in total

Review 1.  Benchmarking Performance in Pancreatic Surgery: a Systematic Review of Published Quality Metrics.

Authors:  Cindy Ou; Michaela Rektorysova; Bushra Othman; John A Windsor; Sanjay Pandanaboyana; Benjamin P T Loveday
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Urban versus rural residency and pancreatic cancer survival: A Danish nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jakob Kirkegård; Morten Ladekarl; Claus Wilki Fristrup; Carsten Palnæs Hansen; Mogens Sall; Frank Viborg Mortensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The SYMPTOM-upper gastrointestinal study: A mixed methods study exploring symptom appraisal and help-seeking in Australian upper gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Authors:  Napin Karnchanachari; Shakira Milton; Tjuntu Muhlen-Schulte; Riati Scarborough; Jennifer F Holland; Fiona M Walter; John Zalcberg; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.328

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.