| Literature DB >> 27852131 |
Wan-Ning Wang1, Wen-Long Zhang2, Tao Sun1, Fu-Zhe Ma1, Sensen Su1, Zhong-Gao Xu1.
Abstract
The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) on renal anemia (RA) in renal disease patients by a meta-analysis. Relevant studies published before June 2015 were searched. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the effect of HD and PD on RA based on five indexes: hemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation index, serum albumin, and parathyroid hormone. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment were conducted to evaluate the stability and reliability of our results. A total of fourteen eligible studies with 1103 cases underwent HD and 625 cases underwent PD were used for this meta-analysis. There were no significant difference for levels of hemoglobin (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.74 to 0.28), ferritin (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.59 to 0.62), parathyroid hormone (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI: -1.53 to 1.75) and transferrin saturation index (SMD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.67 to 0.56) between HD and PD group. However, the content of serum albumin in HD group was much more than that in PD group (SMD = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.35 to 2.81). Neither of the included studies could reverse the pooled side effect and Egger's test demonstrated no publication bias. Both of the two dialysis strategies have a similar effect on RA in renal disease patients.Entities:
Keywords: Peritoneal dialysis; hemodialysis; meta-analysis; renal anemia; renal in end-stage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27852131 PMCID: PMC6014401 DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2016.1244079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ren Fail ISSN: 0886-022X Impact factor: 2.606
Figure 1.Literature search and study selection.
Characteristics of 14 included studies in this meta-analysis.
| Author | Year | Study location | Type | Gender (M/F) | Age (years) | Weight (kg)/BMI | Time on dialysis | Hemoglobin (g/dL) | Ferritin (ng/mL) | Transferrin saturation index (%) | Serum albumin (g/dL) | Parathyroid hormone | Study types | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Coronel | 2003 | Spain | HD | 69 | 40/29 | 65 ± 15 | NA | 64 ± 69 m | 11.6 ± 1.3 | 338 ± 167 | 23.1 ± 7.7 | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 412 ± 438 pg/mL | A comparative multicenter study |
| PD | 63 | 32/31 | 56 ± 15 | NA | 26 ± 26 m | 11.4 ± 1.4 | 218 ± 214 | 26.2 ± 10.8 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 272 ± 290 pg/mL | ||||
| G.K. Sakkas | 2004 | UK | HD | 12 | 10/2 | 62 (35–76) | 75 (60–90) | 47 (6–192) m | 11.3 ± 0.9 | NA | NA | 3.9 ± 0.4 | 8.4 ± 10 pmol/L | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD* | 12 | 7/5 | 55 (37–70) | 79 (51–105) | 47 (7–196) m | 12.6 ± 1.3 | NA | NA | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 22 ± 20 pmol/L | ||||
| M.R. Fructuoso | 2011 | Portugal | HD | 37 | 21/16 | 67.3 ± 14.9 | NA | 6.1 ± 6.5 y | 11.9 ± 1.2 | NA | NA | 3.36 ± 0.44 | NA | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD | 14 | 8/6 | 38.9 ± 13.3 | NA | 1.9 ± 1.3 y | 11.5 ± 1.8 | NA | NA | 3.35 ± 0.33 | NA | ||||
| A. Vega | 2014 | Ireland | HD | 176 | NA | 66 ± 15 | 26.3 ± 5.5 | NA | NA | 165.0 ± 55.2 | 34 ± 9.8 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | NA | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD | 42 | NA | 58 ± 17 | 26.1 ± 3.9 | NA | NA | 204.2 ± 78.9 | 36 ± 10.1 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | NA | ||||
| I.G. Okpechi | 2013 | South Africa | HD | 56 | 26/30 | 38.6 ± 1.4 | NA | 49.8 ± 71.5m | 8.5 ± 0.3 | 549.4 ± 54.3 | 24.7 ± 1.4 | 3.97 ± 0.09 | 52.1 ± 7.3 pmol/L | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD | 26 | 17/9 | 36.0 ± 2.2 | NA | 14.5 ± 11.6m | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 457.8 ± 81.6 | 21.2 ± 1.2 | 3.87 ± 0.10 | 80.6 ± 18.1 pmol/L | ||||
| A. Yavuz | 2004 | Turkey | HD | 38 | 21/17 | 50 ± 19 | 63 ± 19 | 27 ± 32 m | 9.9 ± 1.4 | 404 ± 243 | 30 ± 11 | NA | 170.8 ± 180.1 pg/mL | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD* | 40 | 19/21 | 50 ± 13 | 70 ± 13 | 34.6 ± 30.5m | 10.8 ± 1.6 | 376.0 ± 336.7 | 40.8 ± 18.7 | NA | 275.9 ± 183.0 pg/mL | ||||
| A.A. House | 1998 | Canada | HD | 157 | 93/64 | 57.22 ± 1.46 | NA | 14.21 ± 0.68 m | 10.47 ± 0.12 | 258.7 ± 42.66 | 28.5 ± 1.12 | 3.92 ± 0.04 | 282.8 ± 29.2 pg/mL | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD | 126 | 72/54 | 57.46 ± 1.51 | NA | 15.27 ± 0.69 m | 10.71 ± 0.14 | 253.8 ± 56.75 | 28.1 ± 1.02 | 3.44 ± 0.06 | 187.4 ± 19.3 pg/mL | ||||
| J. Gunnell | 1999 | USA | HD | 92 | 54/38 | 53 ± 18 | NA | 3.7 ± 3.0 y | NA | 78 (44–149) | 22.4 (17.1–28.2) | 3.8 (3.5–4.0) | NA | Case-control study |
| PD | 36 | 20/16 | 51 ± 17 | NA | 4.4 ± 4.1 y | NA | 173 (88–334) | 25.6 (21.0–34.2 | 3.8 (3.5–4.2) | NA | ||||
| M.A. Góes | 2010 | USA | HD | 29 | 19/10 | 47 ± 14 | 23.5 ± 3.20 | NA | NA | 406 ± 209 | 32 ± 12 | NA | NA | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD | 29 | 12/17 | 54 ± 14 | 27.7 ± 7.40 | NA | NA | 364 ± 214 | 37 ± 17 | NA | NA | ||||
| Z. Aydin | 2014 | Turkey | HD | 20 | 8/12 | 49.8 ± 12.0 | 23.6 ± 4.1 | NA | 11.7 ± 1.2 | 769 ± 389 | 24.7 ± 9.7 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | NA | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD | 21 | 14/7 | 47.7 ± 12.1 | 28.4 ± 7.7 | NA | 10.7 ± 1.7 | 269 ± 135 | 29.4 ± 14.8 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | NA | ||||
| J.J. Fadrowski | 2004 | USA | HD | 33 | 17/16 | 16.5 ± 1.7 | NA | NA | 11.1 ± 1.4 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD | 66 | 37/29 | 10.7 ± 5.6 | NA | NA | 11.3 ± 1.4 | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||
| N. Al-Hilali | 2005 | Kuwait | HD | 83 | 30/53 | 51.5 ± 15.2 | NA | 32.1 ± 2.4 | 11 (10.30–11.8) | 130 (71–236) | NA | 3.2 (3.0–3.4) | 33 (17.9–64.0) pg/mL | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD* | 35 | 20/15 | 55.8 ± 13.3 | NA | 19.2 ± 2.1 | 11 (10.1–12.0) | 194 (123– 279) | NA | 2.8 (2.3–3.3) | 24 (8.5–53.4) pg/mL | ||||
| U. Frei | 2009 | Germany | HD | 288 | 175/113 | 60.7 ± 15.6 | NA | 12-24 w | 11.2 ± 1.1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Multicentre, open-label uncontrolled study |
| PD | 91 | 45/46 | 52.4 ± 14.0 | NA | 12-24 w | 11.6 ± 1.1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||
| A. Férnandez | 1991 | Spain | HD | 13 | NA | 44.23 ± 15.36 | NA | 52.46 ± 42.32m | 8.76 ± 1.99 | 436.59 ± 528.53 | NA | NA | NA | Cross-sectional observational study |
| PD* | 24 | NA | 51.81 ± 13.87 | NA | 36.63 ± 25.73m | 9.61 ± 1.84 | 459.32 ± 557.75 | NA | NA | NA |
HD: hemodialysis; PD: peritoneal dialysis; m: months; *: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; BMI: body mass index; PTH: parathyroid hormone; M: male; F: female; y: years; w: weeks; NA: not applicable.
Figure 2.Forest plot. (a) Forest plot for the comparison of hemoglobin between HD and PD groups. (b) Forest plot for the comparison of ferritin between HD and PD groups. (c) Forest plot for the comparison of transferrin saturation index between HD and PD groups. (d) Forest plot for the comparison of serum albumin between HD and PD groups. (e) Forest plot for the comparison of parathyroid hormone between HD and PD groups.
Figure 3.Sensitivity analysis of the included studies. (a) hemoglobin; (b) ferritin; (c) transferrin saturation index; (d) serum albumin; (e) parathyroid hormone.