Literature DB >> 27851858

Existing and Emerging Payment and Delivery Reforms in Cardiology.

Steven A Farmer1,2,3, Margaret L Darling3, Meaghan George2, Paul N Casale4,5, Eileen Hagan4, Mark B McClellan2.   

Abstract

Importance: Recent health care reforms aim to increase patient access, reduce costs, and improve health care quality as payers turn to payment reform for greater value. Cardiologists need to understand emerging payment models to succeed in the evolving payment landscape. We review existing payment and delivery reforms that affect cardiologists, present 4 emerging examples, and consider their implications for clinical practice. Observations: Public and commercial payers have recently implemented payment reforms and new models are evolving. Most cardiology models are modified fee-for-service or address procedural or episodic care, but population models are also emerging. Although there is widespread agreement that payment reform is needed, existing programs have significant limitations and the adoption of new programs has been slow. New payment reforms address some of these problems, but many details remain undefined. Conclusions and Relevance: Early payment reforms were voluntary and cardiologists' participation is variable. However, conventional fee-for-service will become less viable, and enrollment in new payment models will be unavoidable. Early participation in new payment models will allow clinicians to develop expertise in new care pathways during a period of relatively lower risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27851858      PMCID: PMC5559293          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  10 in total

1.  Electronic consultations between primary and specialty care clinicians: early insights.

Authors:  Kathryn Horner; Ed Wagner; Jim Tufano
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2011-10

2.  From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care.

Authors:  Harold D Miller
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Michigan's fee-for-value physician incentive program reduces spending and improves quality in primary care.

Authors:  Christy Harris Lemak; Tammie A Nahra; Genna R Cohen; Natalie D Erb; Michael L Paustian; David Share; Richard A Hirth
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2016-11-04

5.  Health reform and physician-led accountable care: the paradox of primary care physician leadership.

Authors:  Farzad Mostashari; Darshak Sanghavi; Mark McClellan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  CMS--engaging multiple payers in payment reform.

Authors:  Rahul Rajkumar; Patrick H Conway; Marilyn Tavenner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The Coming Battle over Shared Savings--Primary Care Physicians versus Specialists.

Authors:  Robert Kocher; Anuraag Chigurupati
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  US Physician Practices Spend More Than $15.4 Billion Annually To Report Quality Measures.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; David Gans; Rachel Weber; Meagan Cea; Amber Tuchovsky; Tara F Bishop; Yesenia Miranda; Brittany A Frankel; Kristina B Ziehler; Meghan M Wong; Todd B Evenson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Patient-centered medical home initiatives expanded in 2009-13: providers, patients, and payment incentives increased.

Authors:  Samuel T Edwards; Asaf Bitton; Johan Hong; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.

Authors:  Douglas A Conrad; David Grembowski; Susan E Hernandez; Bernard Lau; Miriam Marcus-Smith
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.911

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Inconsistent Reporting of Potential Conflicts of Interest Disclosure.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Targeting the Correct Population When Designing Transitional Care Programs for Medicare Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Faraz S Ahmad; Ramsey M Wehbe; Preeti Kansal; Hannah A Jackson; Allen S Anderson; Clyde W Yancy; R Kannan Mutharasan
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Association Between 30-Day Episode Payments and Acute Myocardial Infarction Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Rishi K Wadhera; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Yun Wang; Changyu Shen; Deepak L Bhatt; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-03

4.  Association of Medical Liability Reform With Clinician Approach to Coronary Artery Disease Management.

Authors:  Steven A Farmer; Ali Moghtaderi; Samantha Schilsky; David Magid; William Sage; Nori Allen; Frederick A Masoudi; Avi Dor; Bernard Black
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  Clinical Model to Predict 90-Day Risk of Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Pamela N Peterson; John A Spertus; Kevin F Kennedy; Suzanne V Arnold; Jason H Wasfy; Jeptha P Curtis; Steven M Bradley; Amit P Amin; P Michael Ho; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-10

6.  Drivers of Variation in 90-Day Episode Payments After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Devraj Sukul; Milan Seth; James M Dupree; John D Syrjamaki; Andrew M Ryan; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.546

7.  Comparison of deep learning with traditional models to predict preventable acute care use and spending among heart failure patients.

Authors:  Maor Lewis; Guy Elad; Moran Beladev; Gal Maor; Kira Radinsky; Dor Hermann; Yoav Litani; Tal Geller; Jesse M Pines; Nathan L Shapiro; Jose F Figueroa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Dual Healthcare System Use During Episodes of Acute Care Heart Failure Associated With Higher Healthcare Utilization and Mortality Risk.

Authors:  R Neal Axon; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Charles J Everett; Paul Heidenreich; Kelly J Hunt
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.