| Literature DB >> 27849598 |
Gehui Wang1,2,3,4,5, Renyi Zhang6,4,7, Mario E Gomez3,4,8, Lingxiao Yang3,9, Misti Levy Zamora3, Min Hu7, Yun Lin3, Jianfei Peng3,7, Song Guo3,7, Jingjing Meng1,2,10, Jianjun Li1,2, Chunlei Cheng1,2,10, Tafeng Hu1,2, Yanqin Ren1,2,10, Yuesi Wang11, Jian Gao12, Junji Cao1,2, Zhisheng An1,2,13, Weijian Zhou1,2,14, Guohui Li1,2, Jiayuan Wang1,2,10, Pengfei Tian3,15, Wilmarie Marrero-Ortiz3,4, Jeremiah Secrest3,4, Zhuofei Du7, Jing Zheng7, Dongjie Shang7, Limin Zeng7, Min Shao7, Weigang Wang3,16,17, Yao Huang1,2,10, Yuan Wang18, Yujiao Zhu3,19, Yixin Li3, Jiaxi Hu3, Bowen Pan3, Li Cai3,20, Yuting Cheng1,2,10, Yuemeng Ji3,21, Fang Zhang3,13, Daniel Rosenfeld3,22, Peter S Liss3,23, Robert A Duce3, Charles E Kolb3,24, Mario J Molina25.
Abstract
Sulfate aerosols exert profound impacts on human and ecosystem health, weather, and climate, but their formation mechanism remains uncertain. Atmospheric models consistently underpredict sulfate levels under diverse environmental conditions. From atmospheric measurements in two Chinese megacities and complementary laboratory experiments, we show that the aqueous oxidation of SO2 by NO2 is key to efficient sulfate formation but is only feasible under two atmospheric conditions: on fine aerosols with high relative humidity and NH3 neutralization or under cloud conditions. Under polluted environments, this SO2 oxidation process leads to large sulfate production rates and promotes formation of nitrate and organic matter on aqueous particles, exacerbating severe haze development. Effective haze mitigation is achievable by intervening in the sulfate formation process with enforced NH3 and NO2 control measures. In addition to explaining the polluted episodes currently occurring in China and during the 1952 London Fog, this sulfate production mechanism is widespread, and our results suggest a way to tackle this growing problem in China and much of the developing world.Entities:
Keywords: climate; human health; pollution; severe haze; sulfate aerosol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27849598 PMCID: PMC5137769 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616540113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205