OBJECTIVES: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) continues to gain momentum as a primary care delivery system. We evaluated whether medical home transformation of primary care practices is associated with the use of breast cancer screening, a broadly endorsed preventive service. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study evaluating 12 Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH)-affiliated primary care clinics in greater Boston, Massachusetts. METHODS: Practice transformation was measured quarterly using a continuous PCMH transformation score (range = 0-100) modeled after National Committee for Quality Assurance recognition requirements. We included women aged 50 to 74 years who had at least 1 primary care visit at a participating clinic between April 2012 and December 2013 (n = 20,349)-a period of medical home transformation. The main measures included: a) whether screening was up-to-date at the time of the visit (mammography completion within 24 months prior to the visit); and b) if screening was overdue at the visit (ie, it had been more than 24 months since the last mammogram), and whether timely screening was completed within 3 months after the visit. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, PCMH transformation scores were negatively associated with up-to-date screening status (odds ratio [OR] for a 20-point change, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.96) and with timely screening of women who were overdue (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Preventative care, such as breast cancer screening, may not improve in early PCMH implementation.
OBJECTIVES: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) continues to gain momentum as a primary care delivery system. We evaluated whether medical home transformation of primary care practices is associated with the use of breast cancer screening, a broadly endorsed preventive service. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study evaluating 12 Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH)-affiliated primary care clinics in greater Boston, Massachusetts. METHODS: Practice transformation was measured quarterly using a continuous PCMH transformation score (range = 0-100) modeled after National Committee for Quality Assurance recognition requirements. We included women aged 50 to 74 years who had at least 1 primary care visit at a participating clinic between April 2012 and December 2013 (n = 20,349)-a period of medical home transformation. The main measures included: a) whether screening was up-to-date at the time of the visit (mammography completion within 24 months prior to the visit); and b) if screening was overdue at the visit (ie, it had been more than 24 months since the last mammogram), and whether timely screening was completed within 3 months after the visit. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, PCMH transformation scores were negatively associated with up-to-date screening status (odds ratio [OR] for a 20-point change, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.96) and with timely screening of women who were overdue (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Preventative care, such as breast cancer screening, may not improve in early PCMH implementation.
Authors: Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Leiyu Shi; Diana C Lock; De-Chih Lee; Lydie A Lebrun-Harris; Marshall H Chin; Preeta Chidambaran; Robert S Nocon; Jinsheng Zhu; Alek Sripipatana Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Elisabeth F Beaber; Jane J Kim; Marilyn M Schapira; Anna N A Tosteson; Ann G Zauber; Ann M Geiger; Aruna Kamineni; Donald L Weaver; Jasmin A Tiro Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Judith Fifield; Deborah Dauser Forrest; Joseph A Burleson; Melanie Martin-Peele; William Gillespie Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-03-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Leif I Solberg; A Lauren Crain; Juliana Tillema; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Patricia Fontaine; Robin Whitebird Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Betty Y Liu; Jean O'Malley; Motomi Mori; Lyle J Fagnan; David Lieberman; Cynthia D Morris; David I Buckley; John D Heintzman; Patricia A Carney Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Susan A Sabatino; Mary C White; Trevor D Thompson; Carrie N Klabunde Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer S Haas; Martha Goodrich; Roberta DiFlorio; Charles Brackett; Cheryl Clark; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brittany N Hand; Daniel Gilmore; Daniel L Coury; Amy R Darragh; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Christopher Hanks; Jennifer H Garvin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Ann M Nguyen; Margaret M Paul; Donna R Shelley; Stephanie L Albert; Deborah J Cohen; Pam Bonsu; Tamar Wyte-Lake; Saul Blecker; Carolyn A Berry Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2022 Mar-Apr 01
Authors: Scott W Keith; Dexter Waters; Matthew Alcusky; Sarah Hegarty; Niusha Jafari; Marco Lombardi; Monica Pini; Vittorio Maio Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 6.473