| Literature DB >> 27849221 |
Expedito Ja Luna1, Celia R Furucho2, Rubens A Silva3, Dalva M Wanderley3, Noemia B Carvalho2, Camila G Satolo4, Ruth M Leite5, Cassio Silveira6, Lia Mb Silva2, Fernando M Aith7, Nivaldo Carneiro6, Maria A Shikanai-Yasuda8.
Abstract
With the urbanisation of the population in developing countries and the process of globalisation, Chagas has become an emerging disease in the urban areas of endemic and non-endemic countries. In 2006, it was estimated that the prevalence of Chagas disease among the general Bolivian population was 6.8%. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection among Bolivian immigrants living in São Paulo, Brazil. This study had a sample of 633 volunteers who were randomly selected from the clientele of primary care units located in the central districts of São Paulo, Brazil. Infection was detected by two different ELISA assays with epimastigote antigens, followed by an immunoblot with trypomastigote antigens as a confirmatory test. The prevalence of the infection was 4.4%. Risk factors independently associated with the infection were: a history of rural jobs in Bolivia, knowledge of the vector involved in transmission, and having relatives with Chagas disease. Brazil has successfully eliminated household vector transmission of T. cruzi, as well as its transmission by blood transfusion. The arrival of infected immigrants represents an additional challenge to primary care clinics to manage chronic Chagas disease, its vertical transmission, and the blood derivatives and organ transplant programs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27849221 PMCID: PMC5224353 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760160384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Characteristics of the study sample, São Paulo (SP), Brazil, 2014
| Variable | (nº) | (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 293 | 46.3 |
| Age | ||
| < 10 | 105 | 16.6 |
| 10 - 19 | 85 | 13.4 |
| 20 - 29 | 222 | 35.1 |
| 30 - 39 | 154 | 24.3 |
| 40 and more | 67 | 10.6 |
| Time living in SP | ||
| 0 - 1 year | 136 | 21.5 |
| 2 - 5 years | 269 | 42.5 |
| 6 - 10 years | 102 | 16.1 |
| 11 and more | 126 | 19.9 |
| Country of birth | ||
| Brazil | 87 | 13.7 |
| Other | 7 | 1.1 |
| Bolivia | 539 | 85.2 |
| Dept. La Paz | 410 | 64.8 |
| Exposure to Chagas disease and knowledge about it | ||
| Lived in rural zone in Bolivia | 309 | 48.8 |
| Worked in rural jobs in Bolivia | 211 | 33.3 |
| Knows the “vichunca” | 30 | 4.7 |
| Found it in household | 232 | 36.7 |
| Has been bitten by “vichunca” | 30 | 4.7 |
| Has relatives with Chagas | 51 | 8.1 |
Distribution of Chagas infection, according to variables examined in this study, São Paulo (SP), Brazil, 2014
| Variables/Categories |
| p | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Negative | Positive | ||
| Sex | 0.13 * | ||
| Male | 284 (96.9) | 9 (3.1) | |
| Female | 321 (94.4) | 19 (5.6) | |
| Age group | 0.18 ** | ||
| 1 - 9 | 102 (97.1) | 3 (2.9) | |
| 10 - 19 | 83 (97.6) | 2 (2.4) | |
| 20 - 29 | 210 (94.6) | 12 (5.4) | |
| 30 - 39 | 148 (96.1) | 6 (3.9) | |
| 40 and more | 62 (92.5) | 5 (7.5) | |
| Time living in SP | 0.49 ** | ||
| 0 - 1 year | 127 (93.4) | 9 (6.6) | |
| 2 - 5 | 261 (97.0) | 8 (3.0) | |
| 6 - 10 | 95 (93.1) | 7 (6.9) | |
| 11 and more | 122 (96.8) | 4 (3.2) | |
| Country of birth | 0.02*** | ||
| Bolivia | 511 (94.8) | 28 (5.2) | |
| Brazil and others | 94 (100.0) | - | |
| Department of birth (for those born in Bolivia) | < 0.01* | ||
| La Paz | 403 (98.3) | 7 (1.7) | |
| Other | 108 (83.7) | 21 (16.3) | |
| Lived in rural areas in Bolivia | 0.12* | ||
| Yes | 291 (94.2) | 18 (5.8) | |
| No | 252 (96.9) | 8 (3.1) | |
| Worked in rural jobs in Bolivia | 0.05* | ||
| Yes | 197 (93.4) | 14 (6.6) | |
| No | 340 (96.9) | 11 (3.1) | |
| Characteristics of house in Bolivia | 0.38* | ||
| Cement | 90 (98.9) | 1 (1.1) | |
| Clay | 258 (95.6) | 12 (4.4) | |
| Wood | 5 (100.0) | - | |
| Bricks with plaster | 219 (94.0) | 14 (6.0) | |
| Bricks without plaster | 33 (97.1) | 1 (2.9) | |
| Knows Chagas disease | < 0.01* | ||
| Yes | 160 (90.4) | 17 (9.6) | |
| No | 445 (97.6) | 11 (2.4) | |
| Knows the “vichunca” | < 0.01* | ||
| Yes | 210 (90.5) | 22 (9.5) | |
| No | 395 (98.5) | 6 (1.5) | |
| Has been bitten by the “vichunca” | 0.05*** | ||
| Yes | 26 (86.7) | 4 (13.3) | |
| No | 416 (96.1) | 17 (3.9) | |
| Has found the “vichunca” in/around the household | < 0.01* | ||
| Yes | 102 (90.3) | 11 (9.7) | |
| No | 373 (97.1) | 11 (2.9) | |
| Has relatives with Chagas | < 0.01*** | ||
| Yes | 49 (79.0) | 13 (21.0) | |
| No | 483 (97.6) | 12 (2.4) | |
| Has received blood transfusion | 0.51* | ||
| Yes | 27 (93.1) | 2 (6.9) | |
| No | 578 (95.7) | 26 (4.3) | |
*: pearson chi-square; **: chi-square for linear trend; ***: Fisher exact test.
Logistic regression analysis of factors independently associated with Trypanosoma cruzi infection, São Paulo (SP), Brazil, 2014
| Variable | p | Exp β | 95% CI Exp β | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Born in La Paz Department | < 0.001 | 0.127 | 0.044 | 0.369 |
| Worked in rural jobs in Bolivia | 0.023 | 3.163 | 1.176 | 8.504 |
| Knows the “vichunca” | 0.024 | 3.749 | 1.189 | 11.822 |
| Has relatives with Chagas | 0.018 | 3.412 | 1.239 | 9.398 |
CI: confidence intervals