Literature DB >> 27849143

Chromium(VI) sorption efficiency of acid-activated banana peel over organo-montmorillonite in aqueous solutions.

Anam Ashraf1, Irshad Bibi1,2, Nabeel Khan Niazi1,2,3, Yong Sik Ok4, Ghulam Murtaza1, Muhammad Shahid5, Anitha Kunhikrishnan6, Dongwei Li7, Tariq Mahmood1.   

Abstract

In the present study, we examined sorption of chromate (Cr(VI)) to acid-activated banana peel (AABP) and organo-montmorillonite (O-mont) as a function of pH, initial Cr(VI) concentration at a sorbent dose of 4 g L-1 and at 20 ± 1°C in aqueous solutions. In sorption edge experiments, maximum Cr(VI) removal was obtained at pH 3 after 2 hours by AABP and O-mont (88% and 69%). Sorption isotherm data showed that the sorption capacity of AABP was higher than O-mont (15.1 vs. 6.67 mg g-1, respectively, at pH 4). Freundlich and Langmuir models provided the best fits to describe Cr(VI) sorption onto AABP (R2 = 0.97) and O-mont (R2 = 0.96). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy elucidated that for AABP mainly the -OH, -COOH, -NH2, and for O-mont intercalated amines and -OH surface functional groups were involved in Cr(VI) sorption. The scanning electron microscopy combined with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) analyses, although partly, indicate that the (wt. %) proportion of cations (e.g., Ca, Mg) in AABP decreased after Cr(VI) sorption. This may be due to ion exchange of chromite (Cr(III)) (produced from Cr(VI) reduction) with cationic elements in AABP. Also, Cr(VI) desorption (using phosphate solution) from AABP was lower (29%) than that from O-mont (51%) up to the third regeneration cycle. This bench scale comparative study highlights that the utilization of widely available and low-cost acid-activated biomaterials has a greater potential than organo-clays for Cr(VI) removal in aqueous media. However, future studies are warranted to precisely delineate different mechanisms of Cr(VI) sorption/reduction by acid-activated biomaterials and organo-clays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FTIR; biosorption; contaminated water; modeling; organo-clays; remediation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27849143     DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2016.1256372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Phytoremediation        ISSN: 1522-6514            Impact factor:   3.212


  14 in total

1.  Kinetic and thermodynamic studies on biosorption of Cr(VI) on raw and chemically modified Datura stramonium fruit.

Authors:  Shravan Kumar; Tasrin Shahnaz; N Selvaraju; Prasanna Venkatesh Rajaraman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Screening of rice cultivars for Cr-stress response by using the parameters of seed germination, morpho-physiological and antioxidant analysis.

Authors:  Farwa Basit; Javaid Akhter Bhat; Jiajun Han; Yajing Guan; Basit Latief Jan; Awais Shakoor; Saleh Alansi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Localization and Speciation of Chromium in Coptis chinensis Franch. using Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Technology and Laser Ablation ICP-MS.

Authors:  Wenli Huang; Jie Jiao; Mei Ru; Zhenqing Bai; Honglin Yuan; Zhian Bao; Zongsuo Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Phytohormone up-regulates the biochemical constituent, exopolysaccharide and nitrogen metabolism in paddy-field cyanobacteria exposed to chromium stress.

Authors:  Sanjesh Tiwari; Anuradha Patel; Sheo Mohan Prasad
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Chromium Monitoring in Water by Colorimetry Using Optimised 1,5-Diphenylcarbazide Method.

Authors:  Annija Lace; David Ryan; Mark Bowkett; John Cleary
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated water through zero-valent iron nanoparticles and effects on tomato plant growth performance.

Authors:  Elisa Brasili; Irene Bavasso; Valerio Petruccelli; Giorgio Vilardi; Alessio Valletta; Chiara Dal Bosco; Alessandra Gentili; Gabriella Pasqua; Luca Di Palma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Chromium Morpho-Phytotoxicity.

Authors:  Abdul Wakeel; Ming Xu
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 8.  A Review of Environmental Contamination and Health Risk Assessment of Wastewater Use for Crop Irrigation with a Focus on Low and High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Sana Khalid; Muhammad Shahid; Irshad Bibi; Tania Sarwar; Ali Haidar Shah; Nabeel Khan Niazi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle and Ultrastructural Analyses of Two Kenaf Cultivars (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under Chromium Stress.

Authors:  Lianmei Niu; Rang Cao; Jingquan Kang; Xu Zhang; Jinyin Lv
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Chromium Bioaccumulation and Its Impacts on Plants: An Overview.

Authors:  Anket Sharma; Dhriti Kapoor; Junfeng Wang; Babar Shahzad; Vinod Kumar; Aditi Shreeya Bali; Shivam Jasrotia; Bingsong Zheng; Huwei Yuan; Daoliang Yan
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.