| Literature DB >> 27848967 |
Federico Brandalise1,2, Stefano Carta1,2, Fritjof Helmchen1,2, John Lisman3, Urs Gerber1,2.
Abstract
The computational repertoire of neurons is enhanced by regenerative electrical signals initiated in dendrites. These events, referred to as dendritic spikes, can act as cell-intrinsic amplifiers of synaptic input. Among these signals, dendritic NMDA spikes are of interest in light of their correlation with synaptic LTP induction. Because it is not possible to block NMDA spikes pharmacologically while maintaining NMDA receptors available to initiate synaptic plasticity, it remains unclear whether NMDA spikes alone can trigger LTP. Here we use dendritic recordings and calcium imaging to analyse the role of NMDA spikes in associative LTP in CA3 pyramidal cells. We show that NMDA spikes produce regenerative branch-specific calcium transients. Decreasing the probability of NMDA spikes reduces LTP, whereas increasing their probability enhances LTP. NMDA spikes and LTP occur without back-propagating action potentials. However, action potentials can facilitate LTP induction by promoting NMDA spikes. Thus, NMDA spikes are necessary and sufficient to produce the critical postsynaptic depolarization required for associative LTP in CA3 pyramidal cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27848967 PMCID: PMC5116082 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Branch-specific NMDAR-dependent dendritic Ca2+ transients evoked by subthreshold synaptic pairing are associated with LTP induction.
(a) Left: ITDP protocol for pairing rCA3 and MF inputs to a hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cell in slice culture. The recording pipette contained 500 μM QX-314. Right: representative example of pairing-evoked EPSPs and averaged traces of the rCA3 EPSP before and after LTP. (b) Time course throughout the pairing protocol of EPSP amplitudes normalized to baseline. rCA3-evoked but not MF-evoked EPSPs are potentiated. (c) Representative example of scaled voltage traces (normalized to initial rCA3 EPSP amplitude) reveal a bimodal distribution of response amplitude corresponding to linear (black) and supralinear (red) summation. Inset: individual traces for a rCA3 EPSP, a MF EPSP and a summated supralinear EPSP. (d) Supralinear responses are suppressed by NMDAR blockade (D-AP5) resulting in a unimodal distribution of summated EPSP amplitudes. (e) Fluo-5F labelled CA3 pyramidal neuron. Fluorescence measurements to detect pairing-induced Ca2+ transients were obtained in three ROIs for apical dendritic branches in FOV 1 and five ROIs for basal dendritic branches in FOV 2. Lower right image shows localized Fluo-5F ΔF/F fluorescence change for one pairing trial (arrow in f). (f) Example Ca2+ transients from ROIs selected in e, recorded during 5/30 representative consecutive pairings (green bars). Trials with linear (‘−') and supralinear (‘+') EPSP summation are indicated. Ca2+ transients for FOV 2 were averaged separately for linear (n=14/30) and supralinear (n=16/30) trials. (g) NMDAR blockade abolished dendritic Ca2+ transients as shown for the same ROIs as in f. (h) A series of uniformly sized ROIs (∼1 × 1 μm) numbered from 1 to 20 were positioned along a responsive dendritic segment (delineated by arrows) as identified from the heat map in e. Images from three pairing trials in which an NMDA spike was evoked. (i) Ca2+ transients associated with an NMDA spike for ROI 8 and 11 (red traces) and for ROIs outside the active region (black traces) for the image in i marked with an asterisk. (j) The magnitude of LTP of the rCA3 EPSP correlates across cells with the incidence of Ca2+ transients during pairing (number of trials with Ca2+ transients in at least one ROI divided by the total number of ITDP pairings). In cells where the pairing protocol failed to evoke Ca2+ transients (green data points), EPSPs were not potentiated. Red data point corresponds to the example cell shown in d (r=0.79, n=16). (k) Pooled data showing the increase in NMDA spike amplitude as a function of the prevalence of dendritic Ca2+ transients (r=0.73, n=16).
Figure 2LTP induction can be manipulated bidirectionally by altering the probability of NMDA spikes.
(a) Representative example of voltage recordings during a weak ITDP protocol, which was below threshold for consistently evoking NMDA spikes and did not potentiate the rCA3 EPSP (top, blue traces). Increasing glutamate spillover with 10 μM TBOA during a second pairing protocol in the same cell enhanced the probability of NMDA spikes (red traces) and induced LTP (square: ITDP; triangle: ITDP + TBOA). (b) Pooled data for rCA3 EPSP amplitude after the weak ITDP protocol was applied in the absence and presence of TBOA (rCA3 EPSP amplitude was measured after TBOA washout). (c) Pooled data for the probability of evoking an NMDA spike and for the NMDA spike amplitude in the two conditions. (d) Decreasing NMDA spike probability by hyperpolarizing the membrane potential. An evoked rCA3 EPSP was paired with a subsequent MF EPSP at decrementing holding potentials with and without NMDAR blockade (D-AP5). For each condition, pairing was repeated only 10 times to avoid inducing LTP. (e) Pooled data show a linear decrease in summated EPSP amplitude during NMDAR blockade when the holding potential becomes more depolarized (blue traces). Repeating the experiment without NMDAR blockade reveals a nonlinear enhancement in EPSP amplitude at membrane potentials less negative than −70 mV (orange traces). (f) When the ITDP protocol was delivered at a hyperpolarized holding potential (more negative than −70 mV, square), where NMDARs do not contribute significantly to synaptic responses, NMDA spikes were rarely evoked. When the same protocol was repeated at −60 mV (triangle), NMDA spikes were evoked with high probability. (g) Time course of rCA3 EPSP amplitude showing that the ITDP protocol has no effect at −73 mV (square) but induces LTP at −60 mV (triangle). (h) Pooled data for NMDA spike incidence (6.1±1.5% versus 45.6±2.9%, n=7, P<0.001) and amplitude (101.3±4.9 versus 106.9± 11.8, n=7, P=0.68, paired t-test) for the two conditions.
Figure 3STDP protocols induce LTP only if NMDA spikes are generated.
(a) Representative voltage traces recorded simultaneously at the soma and a second-order dendrite (see schematic), first during an STDP protocol pairing rCA3 EPSPs with a single AP evoked by brief somatic current injection (2 ms; 4 nA; left), followed by pairing with three evoked APs delivered at a frequency of 200 Hz (right). A 1 AP STDP protocol failed to potentiate EPSPs, whereas 3 AP STDP resulted in LTP (top traces). Note that the 1 AP STDP protocol was generally insufficient to generate a supralinear dendritic response, whereas the 3 AP STDP protocol caused dendritic spikes visible in the dendritic recording and to a lesser extent, because of cable filtering, in the somatic recording. Inset: Area under the evoked responses was plotted to distinguish between linear and supralinear events. (b) Supralinear responses with the 3 AP STDP protocol were prevented following NMDAR blockade (D-AP5, 1.4±3.2%, n=5, P<0.0001). Inset: supralinear responses are prevented when NMDARs are blocked. (c) Faster EPSP rise times in dendrite versus soma (n=5, P=0.008, paired t-test) indicates that for these experiments a majority of the synapses activated by stimulation of rCA3 collaterals were located at or near the dendritic branch recorded from. The green line denotes the pooled average of all cells. (d) The NMDAR contribution generated by the different STDP protocols was estimated by calculating the ratio between the areas under the voltage traces in the absence and presence of D-AP5 (n=5, P=0.0001, paired t-test). (e) When the STDP protocol did not adequately activate NMDARs to generate a supralinear response, LTP was not induced (n=5, P=0.7; paired t-test). (f) A hyperpolarizing pulse applied during the 3 AP STDP protocol decreased the probability of evoking an NMDA spike and prevented LTP induction. As a result, a supralinear response was not generated, either in the soma (blue trace) or the dendrite (brown trace). Furthermore, the rCA3 EPSP was not potentiated (black traces: rCA3 EPSP recorded in the soma). When the same protocol was repeated, but without the hyperpolarizing pulse, supralinear responses were generated and LTP was induced. (g) Pooled data showing faster rise times for the rCA3 EPSP in the dendritic as compared with the somatic recording (n=5, P=0.0008; paired t-test), indicating that primarily dendritic inputs were stimulated. (h) Quantification of the contribution mediated by NMDARs to the recorded responses shows that the STDP protocol that included a hyperpolarizing pulse (3AP STDPhyper) inhibited the generation of a supralinear signal versus without the hyperpolarization (3AP STDP, n=5, P=0.0001, paired t-test). (i) In addition, the STDP protocol that included a hyperpolarizing pulse greatly reduced the magnitude of LTP at the rCA3 synapse (n=5, P=0.0002, paired t-test).