Literature DB >> 27848745

Global Matrix 2.0: Report Card Grades on the Physical Activity of Children and Youth Comparing 38 Countries.

Mark S Tremblay, Joel D Barnes, Silvia A González, Peter T Katzmarzyk, Vincent O Onywera, John J Reilly, Grant R Tomkinson.   

Abstract

The Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance organized the concurrent preparation of Report Cards on the physical activity of children and youth in 38 countries from 6 continents (representing 60% of the world's population). Nine common indicators were used (Overall Physical Activity, Organized Sport Participation, Active Play, Active Transportation, Sedentary Behavior, Family and Peers, School, Community and the Built Environment, and Government Strategies and Investments), and all Report Cards were generated through a harmonized development process and a standardized grading framework (from A = excellent, to F = failing). The 38 Report Cards were presented at the International Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health in Bangkok, Thailand on November 16, 2016. The consolidated findings are summarized in the form of a Global Matrix demonstrating substantial variation in grades both within and across countries. Countries that lead in certain indicators often lag in others. Average grades for both Overall Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior around the world are D (low/poor). In contrast, the average grade for indicators related to supports for physical activity was C. Lower-income countries generally had better grades on Overall Physical Activity, Active Transportation, and Sedentary Behaviors compared with higher-income countries, yet worse grades for supports from Family and Peers, Community and the Built Environment, and Government Strategies and Investments. Average grades for all indicators combined were highest (best) in Denmark, Slovenia, and the Netherlands. Many surveillance and research gaps were apparent, especially for the Active Play and Family and Peers indicators. International cooperation and cross-fertilization is encouraged to address existing challenges, understand underlying determinants, conceive innovative solutions, and mitigate the global childhood inactivity crisis. The paradox of higher physical activity and lower sedentary behavior in countries reporting poorer infrastructure, and lower physical activity and higher sedentary behavior in countries reporting better infrastructure, suggests that autonomy to play, travel, or chore requirements and/or fewer attractive sedentary pursuits, rather than infrastructure and structured activities, may facilitate higher levels of physical activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active transportation; international; play; policy; sedentary behavior; sport

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27848745     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  125 in total

1.  Rethinking school-based approaches to promote physical activity among children: using the evidence base more effectively.

Authors:  Anthony D Okely
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  A Motivational Model of Physical Education and Links to Enjoyment, Knowledge, Performance, Total Physical Activity and Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Arto Gråstén; Anthony Watt
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  At-a-glance - "A tough sell": findings from a qualitative analysis on the provision of healthy foods in recreation and sports settings.

Authors:  Jessie-Lee D McIsaac; Sherry L Jarvis; Rebecca Spencer; Sara Fl Kirk
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Contribution of Gaelic Football Participation to Youth Physical Activity Levels.

Authors:  Kevin W Gavin; Aoife Lane; Kieran P Dowd
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Evaluation of the wrist-worn ActiGraph wGT3x-BT for estimating activity energy expenditure in preschool children.

Authors:  C Delisle Nyström; J Pomeroy; P Henriksson; E Forsum; F B Ortega; R Maddison; J H Migueles; M Löf
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Regional comparisons of walking or bicycling for fun or exercise and for active transport in a nationally distributed sample of community-based youth.

Authors:  R P Saunders; M Dowda; K McIver; R R Pate
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Promoting Physical Activity Through Youth Sports Programs: It's Social.

Authors:  Erin K Howie; Bryce T Daniels; Justin M Guagliano
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2018-01-27

8.  Is sport enough? Contribution of sport to overall moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity among adolescents.

Authors:  Harriet Koorts; Anna Timperio; Lauren Arundell; Kate Parker; Gavin Abbott; Jo Salmon
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.319

9.  A Web-Based Time-Use Application to Assess Diet and Movement Behavior in Asian Schoolchildren: Development and Usability Study of My E-Diary for Activities and Lifestyle (MEDAL).

Authors:  Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Mary Foong-Fong Chong; Airu Chia; Muhammad Naeem Jia Sheng Chew; Sarah Yi Xuan Tan; Mei Jun Chan; Marjorelee T Colega; Jia Ying Toh; Padmapriya Natarajan; Carla Lança; Lynette P Shek; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Physical Fitness and Motor Competence in Chinese and German Elementary School Children in Relation to Different Physical Activity Settings.

Authors:  Andreas Hohmann; Xinchi Yuan; Manfred Schmitt; Hui Zhang; Micha Pietzonka; Maximilian Siener
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.