Literature DB >> 27848266

Sensitivity of lumbar spine response to follower load and flexion moment: finite element study.

Sadegh Naserkhaki1, Marwan El-Rich1.   

Abstract

The follower load (FL) combined with moments is commonly used to approximate flexed/extended posture of the lumbar spine in absence of muscles in biomechanical studies. There is a lack of consensus as to what magnitudes simulate better the physiological conditions. Considering the in-vivo measured values of the intradiscal pressure (IDP), intervertebral rotations (IVRs) and the disc loads, sensitivity of these spinal responses to different FL and flexion moment magnitudes was investigated using a 3D nonlinear finite element (FE) model of ligamentous lumbosacral spine. Optimal magnitudes of FL and moment that minimize deviation of the model predictions from in-vivo data were determined. Results revealed that the spinal parameters i.e. the IVRs, disc moment, and the increase in disc force and moment from neutral to flexed posture were more sensitive to moment magnitude than FL magnitude in case of flexion. The disc force and IDP were more sensitive to the FL magnitude than moment magnitude. The optimal ranges of FL and flexion moment magnitudes were 900-1100 N and 9.9-11.2 Nm, respectively. The FL magnitude had reverse effect on the IDP and disc force. Thus, magnitude for FL or flexion that minimizes the deviation of all the spinal parameters together from the in-vivo data can vary. To obtain reasonable compromise between the IDP and disc force, our findings recommend that FL of low magnitude must be combined with flexion moment of high intensity and vice versa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar spine; finite element study; follower load; optimal load; sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27848266     DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1257707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  3 in total

1.  Finite element analysis comparing short-segment instrumentation with conventional pedicle screws and the Schanz pedicle screw in lumbar 1 fractures.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Sheng Yang; Jifeng Liu; Jianmin Lu; Depeng Shang; Chao Chen; Huanhuan Wang; Jinming Ma
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  The Effect of Muscle Direction on the Predictions of Finite Element Model of Human Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Rui Zhu; Wen-Xin Niu; Zhi-Peng Wang; Xiao-Long Pei; Bin He; Zhi-Li Zeng; Li-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Biomechanical Investigation Between Rigid and Semirigid Posterolateral Fixation During Daily Activities: Geometrically Parametric Poroelastic Finite Element Analyses.

Authors:  Mohammad Nikkhoo; Meng-Ling Lu; Wen-Chien Chen; Chen-Ju Fu; Chi-Chien Niu; Yang-Hua Lin; Chih-Hsiu Cheng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.