Literature DB >> 27848133

Sociopolitical and economic elements to explain the environmental performance of countries.

Thiago Alexandre das Neves Almeida1,2, Isabel-María García-Sánchez3.   

Abstract

The present research explains environmental performance using an ecological composite index as the dependent variable and focusing on two national dimensions: sociopolitical characteristics and economics. Environmental performance is measured using the Composite Index of Environmental Performance (CIEP) indicator proposed by García-Sánchez et al. (2015). The first model performs a factor analysis to aggregate the variables according to each analyzed dimension. In the second model, the estimation is run using only single variables. Both models are estimated using generalized least square estimation (GLS) using panel data from 152 countries and 6 years. The results show that sociopolitical factors and international trade have a positive effect on environmental performance. When the variables are separately analyzed, democracy and social policy have a positive effect on environmental performance while transport, infrastructure, consumption of goods, and tourism have a negative effect. Further observation is that the trade-off between importing and exporting countries overshadows the pollution caused by production. It was also observed that infrastructure has a negative coefficient for developing countries and positive for developed countries. The best performances are in the democratic and richer countries that are located in Europe, while the worst environmental performance is by the nondemocratic and the poorest countries, which are on the African continent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Economic aspects; Environmental performance; Sociopolitical characteristics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27848133     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8061-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  8 in total

1.  Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios.

Authors:  Vamilson Prudêncio da Silva; Hayo M G van der Werf; Airton Spies; Sebastião Roberto Soares
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Critical materialism: science, technology, and environmental sustainability.

Authors:  Richard York; Brett Clark
Journal:  Sociol Inq       Date:  2010

3.  Environmental impact assessment and environmental audit in large-scale public infrastructure construction: the case of the Qinghai-Tibet Railway.

Authors:  Guizhen He; Lei Zhang; Yonglong Lu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  Democratizing economics: pluralism as a path toward sustainability.

Authors:  Peter Söderbaum; Judy Brown
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Environmental impacts of tourism in the Gulf and the Red Sea.

Authors:  William Gladstone; Belinda Curley; Mohammad Reza Shokri
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  Explaining differences in the environmental performance of countries: a comparative study.

Authors:  Dorit Kerret; Renana Shvartzvald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Carbon emissions of infrastructure development.

Authors:  Daniel B Müller; Gang Liu; Amund N Løvik; Roja Modaresi; Stefan Pauliuk; Franciska S Steinhoff; Helge Brattebø
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  The Measurement of Economic, Social and Environmental Performance of Countries: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Cracolici; Miranda Cuffaro; Peter Nijkamp
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2009-04-09
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  The nexus of fiscal policy instruments and environmental degradation in China.

Authors:  Peng Yuelan; Muhammad Waqas Akbar; Muhammad Hafeez; Manzoor Ahmad; Zeenat Zia; Sana Ullah
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.