H Braunwarth1, F H H Brill2, J Steinmann3, D Hegeholz4, W Droste5. 1. Coloplast GmbH, Kuehnstraße 75, 22045, Hamburg, Deutschland. dedbr@coloplast.com. 2. Dr. Brill + Partner GmbH Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Hamburg, Deutschland. 3. Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland. 4. Coloplast GmbH, Kuehnstraße 75, 22045, Hamburg, Deutschland. 5. , Selm, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A urostomy with an ileum conduit or a skin fistula leads to a high infection risk for the kidneys and the ureter of the patient. Therefore, the prevention of retrograde colonization of the artificial drain (splint) with e. g. contaminated urine is the most important objective of infection prevention measurements. We performed an in vitro experiment to determine the migration speed of clinically relevant bacteria in a commercially available splint catheter system. METHODS: The migration speed of bacteria in commonly used splint catheters was determined in a practice-like in vitro model. Two storage vessels were connected with splints. The second vessel contained a bacterial suspension of the test bacteria Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus aureus in artificial urine. The two vessels were incubated at 36 °C for 24-72 h. The microbial count in the catheters was determined after each experiment to investigate the migration distance. RESULTS: The average migration speed was 0.63 cm/h for E. coli, 0.80 cm/h for S. aureus, and 0.94 cm/h for P. aeruginosa. This results in a colonization distance of approximately 80 cm in 3 days. CONCLUSION: If the system, e. g., the stoma pouch is contaminated, it can be expected that during the common application time of a splint of 10-14 days, the complete splint will be contaminated due to the high bacteria migration speed. Consequently there is a high infection risk for kidneys and ureters. A return stop feature in the stoma pouch should minimize this risk. However, it is of upmost importance to not applying the splint through the return stop to prevent any contact with potentially contaminated urine.
BACKGROUND: A urostomy with an ileum conduit or a skin fistula leads to a high infection risk for the kidneys and the ureter of the patient. Therefore, the prevention of retrograde colonization of the artificial drain (splint) with e. g. contaminated urine is the most important objective of infection prevention measurements. We performed an in vitro experiment to determine the migration speed of clinically relevant bacteria in a commercially available splint catheter system. METHODS: The migration speed of bacteria in commonly used splint catheters was determined in a practice-like in vitro model. Two storage vessels were connected with splints. The second vessel contained a bacterial suspension of the test bacteria Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus aureus in artificial urine. The two vessels were incubated at 36 °C for 24-72 h. The microbial count in the catheters was determined after each experiment to investigate the migration distance. RESULTS: The average migration speed was 0.63 cm/h for E. coli, 0.80 cm/h for S. aureus, and 0.94 cm/h for P. aeruginosa. This results in a colonization distance of approximately 80 cm in 3 days. CONCLUSION: If the system, e. g., the stoma pouch is contaminated, it can be expected that during the common application time of a splint of 10-14 days, the complete splint will be contaminated due to the high bacteria migration speed. Consequently there is a high infection risk for kidneys and ureters. A return stop feature in the stoma pouch should minimize this risk. However, it is of upmost importance to not applying the splint through the return stop to prevent any contact with potentially contaminated urine.
Authors: Raimund Stein; Markus Hohenfellner; Sascha Pahernik; Stephan Roth; Joachim W Thüroff; Herbert Rübben Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Helena Thulin; Gunnar Steineck; Ulrika Kreicbergs; Erik Onelöv; Christer Ahlstrand; Malcolm Carringer; Sten Holmäng; Börje Ljungberg; Per-Uno Malmström; David Robinsson; Hans Wijkström; N Peter Wiklund; Lars Henningsohn Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 5.588