Gianluca Rigatelli1, Marco Zuin2, Luigi Pedon3, Roberto Zecchel3, Fabio Dell'Avvocata4, Antonio Carrozza3, Marco Zennaro3, Gianni Pastore5, Francesco Zanon5. 1. Section of Adult Congenital and Adult Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Endoluminal Interventions, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy. Electronic address: jackyheart71@yahoo.it. 2. Department of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy and Section of Internal and Cardiopulmonary Medicine, Department of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. 3. Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Cittadella General Hospital, Padua, Italy. 4. Section of Adult Congenital and Adult Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Endoluminal Interventions, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy. 5. Interventional Electrophysiology Unit, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Incidence of electrical disturbances in patients submitted to transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has not been fully clarified in a large population. The aim of the study is to assess the incidence of atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachi-arrhythmias, and atrio-ventricular block in the acute and very long-term follow-up. METHODS/MATERIALS: We reviewed the medical and instrumental data of 1000 consecutive patients (mean age 47.3±17.1years) prospectively enrolled in two centers over a 13-year period (February 1999 to February 2012) for right-to-left (R-to-L) shunt ICE-aided catheter-based closure using different devices. RESULTS: Successful transcatheter PFO closure was achieved in 99.8% of the patients. Implanted devices were: Amplatzer PFO Occluder in 463 patients (46.3%), Amplatzer ASD Cribriform Occluder in 420 patients (42.0%), Premere Occlusion System in 95 patients (9.5%), and Biostar Occluder in 22 patients (2.2%). Postprocedural electrical complications occurred in 5.9% of patients. The only independent predictors of electrophysiological complications were female gender (OR 2.3, 0.5-5.1 [95% CI], p<0.001) and device disk >30mm (OR 5.0, 1.2-7.2 [95% CI], p<0.001). On a mean follow-up of 12 .3±0.6years (minimum 4- maximum 17years), electrical complications occurred in 1.4% of patients including one only case of complete AVB and 5 cases of permanent AF. The only independent predictors were female gender (OR 2.3, 0.5-5.1 [95% CI], p<0.001) and device disk >30mm (OR 5.0, 1.2-7.2 [95% CI], p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Device-based closure of PFO using different devices, appeared very safe from an electrophysiological point of view with low incidence of electrical disturbances even in the very long-term follow-up.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Incidence of electrical disturbances in patients submitted to transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has not been fully clarified in a large population. The aim of the study is to assess the incidence of atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachi-arrhythmias, and atrio-ventricular block in the acute and very long-term follow-up. METHODS/MATERIALS: We reviewed the medical and instrumental data of 1000 consecutive patients (mean age 47.3±17.1years) prospectively enrolled in two centers over a 13-year period (February 1999 to February 2012) for right-to-left (R-to-L) shunt ICE-aided catheter-based closure using different devices. RESULTS: Successful transcatheter PFO closure was achieved in 99.8% of the patients. Implanted devices were: Amplatzer PFO Occluder in 463 patients (46.3%), Amplatzer ASD Cribriform Occluder in 420 patients (42.0%), Premere Occlusion System in 95 patients (9.5%), and Biostar Occluder in 22 patients (2.2%). Postprocedural electrical complications occurred in 5.9% of patients. The only independent predictors of electrophysiological complications were female gender (OR 2.3, 0.5-5.1 [95% CI], p<0.001) and device disk >30mm (OR 5.0, 1.2-7.2 [95% CI], p<0.001). On a mean follow-up of 12 .3±0.6years (minimum 4- maximum 17years), electrical complications occurred in 1.4% of patients including one only case of complete AVB and 5 cases of permanent AF. The only independent predictors were female gender (OR 2.3, 0.5-5.1 [95% CI], p<0.001) and device disk >30mm (OR 5.0, 1.2-7.2 [95% CI], p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Device-based closure of PFO using different devices, appeared very safe from an electrophysiological point of view with low incidence of electrical disturbances even in the very long-term follow-up.