Literature DB >> 27847100

Thrombolytic therapy delay is independent predictor of mortality in acute pulmonary embolism at emergency service.

İnan Beydilli1, Fevzi Yılmaz2, Bedriye Müge Sönmez2, Nalan Kozacı2, Akar Yılmaz3, İbrahim Halil Toksul2, Ramazan Güven4, Mustafa Avcı2.   

Abstract

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Delays in diagnosis or therapy may result in sudden, fatal deterioration; therefore, rapid diagnosis and an appropriate therapeutic approach are needed. We aimed to investigate the effect of delaying thrombolytic administration on the mortality rate in a suspected PE. We retrospectively analyzed 49 consecutive patients who were aged 18 years or older and received thrombolysis for a high-risk PE without a major contraindication. All patients were classified according to the time of onset of the thrombolytic therapy. Patients experiencing cardiopulmonary arrest were analyzed from the time of admission to thrombolytic administration with 10-minute cutoff values. Data were analyzed by a regression analysis and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for significant and independent associated risk factors and in-hospital mortality. Mortality was seen in 17 of the 49 cases. Thirteen of these had received thrombolytic therapy 1 hour after their emergency department (ED) admission. Among all cases, the mortality rate was 35%. The ROC analysis indicated that a > 97-second delayed thrombolytic administration time was associated with mortality with 53% sensitivity and 91% specificity (area under the curve, 0.803; 95% confidence interval, 0.668-0.938). In the logistic regression, a 5-minute delay in thrombolytic therapy (beta = 1.342; 95% confidence interval, 1.818-2.231; p = 0.001) was associated with in-hospital mortality in the multivariable model. No major bleeding complications were seen in PE survivors. We conclude that early onset thrombolytic therapy in the ED for high-risk and hemodynamically worsening patients appears safe and life-saving.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Echocardiography; Thromboembolism; Thrombolytic agent

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27847100     DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci        ISSN: 1607-551X            Impact factor:   2.744


  3 in total

1.  Catheter directed compared to systemically delivered thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed K Pasha; Muhammad Umer Siddiqui; Muhammad Danial Siddiqui; Adnan Ahmed; Ammar Abdullah; Irbaz Riaz; M Hassan Murad; Haraldur Bjarnason; Waldemar E Wysokinski; Robert D McBane
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Is there an optimal "door to cath time" in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism with catheter-directed thrombolysis?

Authors:  Aranyak Rawal; Devarshi Ardeshna; Kirstin Hesterberg; Brandon Cave; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Is Bedside End-Tidal CO2 Measurement a Screening Tool to Exclude Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Department?

Authors:  Metin Ozdemir; Bedriye Muge Sonmez; Fevzi Yilmaz; Aykut Yilmaz; Murat Duyan; Seval Komut
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2019-10-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.