Literature DB >> 27846861

Intraosseous inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the mandible with a novel ATIC-ALK fusion mutation: a case report.

Yoko Tateishi1, Koji Okudela2, Shigeo Kawai3, Takehisa Suzuki2, Shigeaki Umeda2, Mai Matsumura2, Mitomu Kioi4, Kenichi Ohashi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare low-grade malignant neoplasm with a predilection for children and young adults, and typically arises in the lung, abdominopelvic region, and retroperitoneum. IMTs in the maxillofacial region are extreme rare. Approximately 50% of IMT harbor rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene at 2p23 with various fusion partners. CASE
PRESENTATION: We herein report a case of intraosseous IMT of the mandible with a novel ATIC-ALK fusion. Tooth 43 did not erupt after the loss of tooth 83 in an 11-year-old girl with no previous history of trauma. Panoramic tomography showed a unilocular radiolucent lesion in the right anterior mandible resorbing the root of tooth 42 and the medial side of the root of tooth 44. Computed tomography revealed a well- circumscribed 3-cm osteolytic lesion of the right anterior mandible eroding the buccal cortical plate. The entire lesion was curetted out. A histopathological examination revealed the proliferation of plump spindle cells with a storiform architecture and lymphocytes scattered around spindle cells. The spindle cells showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining for ALK by immunohistochemistry. A fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed the translocation of a part of the ALK gene locus at chromosome 2p23. A rapid amplification of cDNA ends analysis confirmed the rearrangement of ALK and identified ATIC as a partner of this ALK fusion mutant.
CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of intraosseous IMT of the mandible with a novel ATIC-ALK fusion. We also herein reviewed similar tumors reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends; ATIC-ALK fusion; Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor; Mandible; RT-PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27846861      PMCID: PMC5111215          DOI: 10.1186/s13000-016-0586-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1746-1596            Impact factor:   2.644


Background

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are more frequent in children and young adults, and typically arise in the lung, abdominopelvic region, and retroperitoneum [1, 2]. Unusual sites of involvement include the head and neck, genitourinary tract, heart, extremities, and central nervous system [2]. While these tumors are rare in the head and neck, they are even more uncommon in the mandible [3]. IMTs are mesenchymal neoplasms of intermediate malignant potential and histologically characterized by the proliferation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts admixed with lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils, and histiocytes [1]. The histological features of IMTs are often diagnostic, particularly through anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) staining. The ALK gene has been implicated in the pathogenesis of IMTs, which supports the neoplastic origin of these tumors. Approximately 50% of IMTs harbor rearrangements in the ALK gene at 2p23 [4]. However, to the best of our knowledge, an ALK fusion mutation has not yet been demonstrated in IMTs in the jawbone. We herein report a case of an intraosseous IMT in the mandible including a novel ATIC-ALK fusion mutation.

Case presentation

Clinical features

An 11-year-old girl presented with the delayed eruption of tooth 43 (two digit tooth notation system of the FDI) and mental nerve palsy. She had no history of trauma. An intraoral examination revealed that tooth 43 had not erupted after the loss of tooth 83 and the gingiva and alveolar mucosa of the right mandible were normal. Panoramic tomography showed a unilocular radiolucent lesion in the right anterior mandible resorbing the root of tooth 42 and the medial side of the root of tooth 44 (Fig. 1a). Tooth 43 was not impacted in the mandibular bone. Computed tomography showed a well-circumscribed non-expansile 3-cm osteolytic lesion in the right anterior mandible that eroded the buccal cortical plate and resorbed the root of tooth 42 and the medial side of the root of tooth 44 (Fig. 1b). Root resorption and cortical plate erosion suggested a locally aggressive tumor. The tumor lesion was entirely curetted out. No recurrence was detected in 18 months of follow-up.
Fig. 1

a Panoramic tomography showed the resorption of the root of tooth 42 and medial side of the root of tooth 44 (arrow heads). b Computed tomography revealed a well- circumscribed 3-cm osteolytic lesion in the right mandible that eroded the buccal cortical plate and resorbed the roots of tooth 42 and tooth 44 (arrows)

a Panoramic tomography showed the resorption of the root of tooth 42 and medial side of the root of tooth 44 (arrow heads). b Computed tomography revealed a well- circumscribed 3-cm osteolytic lesion in the right mandible that eroded the buccal cortical plate and resorbed the roots of tooth 42 and tooth 44 (arrows)

Histopathological features and differential diagnosis

A histopathological investigation revealed plump spindle cell proliferation with a storiform architecture and lymphocytes scattered around the spindle cells (Fig. 2a, b). The background stroma included a focal myxoid matrix. These spindle cells had ovoid nuclei with a pale eosinophilic cytoplasm, suggesting a myofibroblastic, myoepithelial, or fibroblastic lineage. Small islands of an odontogenic epithelium were detected. No mitosis or necrosis was observed. The histomorphological findings suggested that spindle cells were of a myofibroblastic, myoepithelial, or fibroblastic lineage. Small islands of an odontogenic epithelium suggested that this tumor was an odontogenic tumor. High-grade malignant tumors were excluded because neither mitosis nor necrosis was observed. Differential diagnoses included myofibroma, myoepithelioma, an odontogenic tumor, solitary fibrous tumor, giant cell granuloma, and IMT.
Fig. 2

Hematoxylin and eosin staining (a, b) and immunohistochemical staining (c, d). a The proliferation of plump spindle cells with a storiform architecture with scattered lymphocytes. Epithelioid components with an appearance suggestive of odontogenic epithelioid cells were detected. b Spindle cells contained ovoid nuclei with a pale eosinophilic cytoplasm. c Spindle cells were positive for SMA. d Spindle cells were positive for ALK

Hematoxylin and eosin staining (a, b) and immunohistochemical staining (c, d). a The proliferation of plump spindle cells with a storiform architecture with scattered lymphocytes. Epithelioid components with an appearance suggestive of odontogenic epithelioid cells were detected. b Spindle cells contained ovoid nuclei with a pale eosinophilic cytoplasm. c Spindle cells were positive for SMA. d Spindle cells were positive for ALK

Immunohistochemical findings

Immunohistochemical staining revealed that spindle cells were positive for α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) (Fig. 2c), ALK (Fig. 2d), CD10, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and negative for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, S100 proteins, and p63. The Ki67 labeling index was 3%.

Molecular pathological findings

FISH

A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (ALK) analysis was performed on a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue block. Rearrangements in the ALK gene at chromosome band 2p23 were detected by FISH utilizing a Vysis ALK break apart probe (Abott Molecular). The FISH analysis revealed the translocation of a part of the ALK gene locus (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3

a FISH assay with a break apart probe for the ALK gene shows one intact yellow signal and one separated red and green signal per nucleus in tumor cells, indicating the presence of a rearrangement in the ALK gene. b The 5′ RACE analysis identified ATIC as a fusion partner. The sequence of the second round PCR product covering the fusion point (arrow) is shown. c The results of the RT-PCR analysis for ATIC-ALK are shown. PT: Present tumor, UT: Unrelated tumor (lung tumor), DW: Distilled Water, GAPDH: glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

a FISH assay with a break apart probe for the ALK gene shows one intact yellow signal and one separated red and green signal per nucleus in tumor cells, indicating the presence of a rearrangement in the ALK gene. b The 5′ RACE analysis identified ATIC as a fusion partner. The sequence of the second round PCR product covering the fusion point (arrow) is shown. c The results of the RT-PCR analysis for ATIC-ALK are shown. PT: Present tumor, UT: Unrelated tumor (lung tumor), DW: Distilled Water, GAPDH: glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

RACE

Total RNA was extracted from frozen tissue using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In order to obtain cDNA fragments corresponding to a novel ALK fusion gene, a rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) analysis was performed using the 5′-full RACE core set (TaKaRa Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with a 5′ end-phosphorylated RT primer (5′-ATCTGGGCCTTGTATTTATCACTC). The primer set used for the first round of PCR was the A1 primer (5′-ACTTCCTGGTTGCTTTTGCTGGGGTAT) [5] and S1 primer (5′-AGAAGGAGCCACACGACAGGGGTAA). The primer set used for the second round of PCR was the S2 primer (5′-CTCCTTCACAAACCAGAGACCAA) and A2 primer (5′-TTCAGGCAGCGTCTTCACAG). The second round PCR product covering the break point was sub-cloned into a pT7Blue plasmid vector (TaKaRa Bio). The DNA sequence was analyzed using universal primers (M13M4 primer or T7 promoter primer) and the Big-dye terminator ver3.1 kit (Applied Biosystems). A RACE analysis confirmed a rearrangement in ALK and identified ATIC (NM_004044) as a partner of this ALK fusion mutant (Fig. 3b).

RT-PCR

First-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was used to confirm the presence of the AITC-ALK fusion gene in this case. The primer set used was as follows: forward (5′-CCAAGCTTCCCATCACAGTGTACC) and reverse (5′-GAGGTCTTGCCAGCAAAGCAGTAG). RT-PCR was used to confirm the presence of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in this case. The primer set used was as follows: forward (5′-TGGAGTCCACTGGCGTCTTC) and reverse (5′-ATGACGAACATGGGGGCATCAG). A RT-PCR analysis confirmed the ATIC-ALK fusion in tumor cells (Fig. 3c). Based on these results, the final diagnosis was IMT.

Discussion

We herein presented the first case of IMT with an ATIC-ALK fusion mutation primarily in the maxillofacial region. IMTs are rare mesenchymal tumors. Different terms have been applied to these lesions, namely, xanthogranuloma, plasma cell granuloma, inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT), and inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma [1, 6, 7]. The diverse nomenclature is descriptive and reflects the uncertainty regarding the true biological nature of these lesions. In 2013, the World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone defined IMT as a distinctive neoplasm composed of myofibroblastic and fibroblastic spindle cells accompanied by an inflammatory infiltrate of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and/or eosinophils [1]. The expression of ALK proteins is detected by anti-ALK immunohistochemistry in approximately 50% of IMT cases. ALK protein expression has been shown to reliably correlate with ALK gene rearrangements [8]. These lines of evidence support ALK-positive IMT being a distinct neoplastic entity. ALK immunostaining is an aid in the pathological diagnosis of IMTs, as well as in the differentiation of IMTs from other spindle cell neoplasms that fall within the broad category of IPTs. We reviewed 12 cases of intraosseous tumors of the mandible with similar histological features in the literature (Table 1) [7, 9–19]. Six cases were diagnosed as IPTs and 6 as IMTs in the mandible. ALK-positive IMT/IPT in the mandible was initially reported in 2005 [10] and only 4 cases including ours have been reported since then [10, 11, 19].
Table 1

Clinicopathological features of IMTs in the mandible described in the present and previous reports

No.Authors (yr.)Age (yr.)SexDiagnosisALK-IHCFISHRT-PCR
1Zegarelli (1974) [7]56FGranuloma (?IPT)NANANA
2Inui (1993) [9]63MIPTNANANA
3Brooks (2005) [10]82FIMTpositiveNANA
4Poh (2005) [11]42FIMTpositiveNANA
5Oh (2008) [12]20FIPTNANANA
6Johann (2008) [13]33MIPTNANANA
7Satomi (2010) [14]14FIMTnegativeNANA
8Date (2010) [15]70MIPTnegativeNANA
9Sasagawa (2011) [16]60MIMTNANANA
10Gawande (2012) [17]20MIPTNANANA
11Sah (2013) [18]30MIMTnegativeNANA
12Stringer (2014) [19]16MIMTpositiveNANA
13Present case11FIMTpositivepositive ATIC-ALK

ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase, IHC immunohistochemistry, FISH Fluorescene in situ hybridization, F female, M male, IPT Inflammatory pseudotumor, IMT Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, NA data not available

Clinicopathological features of IMTs in the mandible described in the present and previous reports ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase, IHC immunohistochemistry, FISH Fluorescene in situ hybridization, F female, M male, IPT Inflammatory pseudotumor, IMT Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, NA data not available Thus, IMT may very rarely occur in the mandible. Otherwise, IMT may often be misdiagnosed because difficulties are associated with its histological differentiation from other spindle cell neoplasms and reactive lesions. Differential diagnoses include posttraumatic spindle cell nodules, giant cell granuloma, myofibroma, myoepithelioma, ameloblastic fibroma, odontogenic myxofibroma, IMT, a solitary fibrous tumor, low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma, myofibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and spindle cell carcinoma. The immunohistochemical expression of the ALK protein is a very important hallmark for differentiating IMT from those described above. Therefore, if spindle cell lesions are detected in the jawbone, IMT must be included in the differential diagnosis and an immunohistochemical examination of ALK protein expression is needed. The present tumor was confirmed to have the ATIC-ALK fusion mutation. Different ALK fusion partners, including TPM3, TPM4, CLTC, CARS, RANBP2, ATIC, SEC31L1, PPFIBP1, and DCTN1, in which TPM3 is the most common partner, have been identified in IMTs [5, 20–26]. ATIC-ALK fusion mutations are very rare, comprising approximately 1% of ALK-fusion mutations in anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCL) [27]. The hypothetical schema of the gene fusion between ATIC and ALK is shown in Fig. 4 [28]. To the best of our knowledge, one case of urinary bladder IMT with the ATIC-ALK fusion mutation and one case of IMT arising from the hyoid bone in a neonate with the ATIC-ALK fusion have been reported in the literature [23, 29]. Thus, the present case is the first IMT with the ATIC-ALK fusion mutation primarily in the mandible.
Fig. 4

The hypothetical schema of the gene fusion between ALK and ATIC. ATIC-ALK fusion is generated by the pericentric inversion of chromosome 2 at the breakpoints of p23 and q35 [inv(2)(p23q35)], in which the ALK and ATIC genes are localized

The hypothetical schema of the gene fusion between ALK and ATIC. ATIC-ALK fusion is generated by the pericentric inversion of chromosome 2 at the breakpoints of p23 and q35 [inv(2)(p23q35)], in which the ALK and ATIC genes are localized The management of IMTs needs to entail complete surgical resection, including postoperative reassessments for at least 10 years [30]. Although the number of IMTs in the jawbone is limited, they appear to exhibit a favorable clinical course. However, it is important to emphasize that IMTs occasionally behave in an aggressive manner. Poh et al. reported the local recurrence of an intraosseous mandibular IMT 14 months after initial surgery [11]. Sasagawa et al. described a case of multiple IMTs involving the cranium, mandible, ischium, and calcaneus [16]. The ALK inhibitor, crizotinib, was recently demonstrated to be clinically beneficial for IMTs with ALK fusion mutations [26, 31–33].

Conclusion

IMTs are rare lesions in the mandible. The general consensus is that IMTs encompass a group of heterogeneous lesions with various biological behaviors. However, a proportion of cases are genuine neoplasms with the involvement of ALK fusion mutations. The recognition of this diagnostic entity is important for selecting appropriate treatments. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to describe IMT with the ATIC-ALK fusion mutation in the mandible.
  32 in total

1.  TPM3-ALK and TPM4-ALK oncogenes in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors.

Authors:  B Lawrence; A Perez-Atayde; M K Hibbard; B P Rubin; P Dal Cin; J L Pinkus; G S Pinkus; S Xiao; E S Yi; C D Fletcher; J A Fletcher
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Aggressive inflammatory pseudotumor of the mandible.

Authors:  Pushkar Devidas Gawande; Mahesh Sambhus; Janardan B Garde; Rajshekhar Halli; Vikram Deshmukh; Adwait Kulkarni; Amrut Ashturkar
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Inflammatory pseudotumor in the mandible.

Authors:  Jung-Hwan Oh; Jin-Hyuk Yim; Byung-Wook Yoon; Byung-Joon Choi; Deok Won Lee; Yong-Dae Kwon
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  Imaging findings of head and neck inflammatory pseudotumor.

Authors:  Sung Bin Park; Jeong Hyun Lee; Young Cheol Weon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Oral inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor demonstrating ALK, p53, MDM2, CDK4, pRb, and Ki-67 immunoreactivity in an elderly patient.

Authors:  John K Brooks; Nikolaos G Nikitakis; Bennett F Frankel; John C Papadimitriou; John J Sauk
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-06

6.  Pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor expressing a novel fusion, PPFIBP1-ALK: reappraisal of anti-ALK immunohistochemistry as a tool for novel ALK fusion identification.

Authors:  Kengo Takeuchi; Manabu Soda; Yuki Togashi; Emiko Sugawara; Satoko Hatano; Reimi Asaka; Sakae Okumura; Ken Nakagawa; Hiroyuki Mano; Yuichi Ishikawa
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  ALK-ATIC fusion in urinary bladder inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor.

Authors:  Maria Debiec-Rychter; Peter Marynen; Anne Hagemeijer; Patrick Pauwels
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  The cryptic inv(2)(p23q35) defines a new molecular genetic subtype of ALK-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  I Wlodarska; C De Wolf-Peeters; B Falini; G Verhoef; S W Morris; A Hagemeijer; H Van den Berghe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Inflammatory pseudotumor in the submandibular region. Clinicopathologic study and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Inui; T Tagawa; A Mori; J Yoneda; J Nomura; T Fukumori
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1993-09

10.  STUMP un"stumped": anti-tumor response to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor based targeted therapy in uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with myxoid features harboring DCTN1-ALK fusion.

Authors:  Vivek Subbiah; Caitlin McMahon; Shreyaskumar Patel; Ralph Zinner; Elvio G Silva; Julia A Elvin; Ishwaria M Subbiah; Chimela Ohaji; Dhakshina Moorthy Ganeshan; Deepa Anand; Charles F Levenback; Jenny Berry; Tim Brennan; Juliann Chmielecki; Zachary R Chalmers; John Mayfield; Vincent A Miller; Philip J Stephens; Jeffrey S Ross; Siraj M Ali
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  2 in total

1.  A clinical signature predicting the malignant transformation of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in the head and neck.

Authors:  Cangbang Peng; Ming Tao Chen; Zheqi Liu; Yibo Guo; Yu Zhang; Tong Ji
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-22

2.  Case Report: Efficacy of ensartinib treatment in pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with a rare GCC2-ALK fusion.

Authors:  Wenguang He; Xiao Ji; Congcong Song; Shanshan Song; Lixia Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.