Literature DB >> 27846757

Accuracy requirements and uncertainties in radiotherapy: a report of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Debbie van der Merwe1, Jacob Van Dyk2, Brendan Healy3, Eduardo Zubizarreta3, Joanna Izewska3, Ben Mijnheer4, Ahmed Meghzifene3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy technology continues to advance and the expectation of improved outcomes requires greater accuracy in various radiotherapy steps. Different factors affect the overall accuracy of dose delivery. Institutional comprehensive quality assurance (QA) programs should ensure that uncertainties are maintained at acceptable levels. The International Atomic Energy Agency has recently developed a report summarizing the accuracy achievable and the suggested action levels, for each step in the radiotherapy process. Overview of the report: The report seeks to promote awareness and encourage quantification of uncertainties in order to promote safer and more effective patient treatments. The radiotherapy process and the radiobiological and clinical frameworks that define the need for accuracy are depicted. Factors that influence uncertainty are described for a range of techniques, technologies and systems. Methodologies for determining and combining uncertainties are presented, and strategies for reducing uncertainties through QA programs are suggested. The role of quality audits in providing international benchmarking of achievable accuracy and realistic action levels is also discussed. RECOMMENDATIONS: The report concludes with nine general recommendations: (1) Radiotherapy should be applied as accurately as reasonably achievable, technical and biological factors being taken into account. (2) For consistency in prescribing, reporting and recording, recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements should be implemented. (3) Each institution should determine uncertainties for their treatment procedures. Sample data are tabulated for typical clinical scenarios with estimates of the levels of accuracy that are practically achievable and suggested action levels. (4) Independent dosimetry audits should be performed regularly. (5) Comprehensive quality assurance programs should be in place. (6) Professional staff should be appropriately educated and adequate staffing levels should be maintained. (7) For reporting purposes, uncertainties should be presented. (8) Manufacturers should provide training on all equipment. (9) Research should aid in improving the accuracy of radiotherapy. Some example research projects are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27846757     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1246801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  6 in total

1.  Heterogeneous Versus Homogeneous Radiation Dose Calculations of Twice-Daily Fractionation in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ryan Thibodeau; Hsin K Li; Sean Tanny; Ajeet Gajra; Jeffrey Bogart
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-07

2.  Detailed analysis of dose difference in using water as tissue-equivalent material in 252Cf brachytherapy.

Authors:  Izadi Vasafi Gholamhossein; Mehdi Firoozabadi Mohammad; Ghorbani Mahdi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-11-04

3.  Impact of different optimization strategies on the compatibility between planned and delivered doses during radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Agata Jodda; Tomasz Piotrowski; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-04-12

4.  Comparison of complexity metrics for multi-institutional evaluations of treatment plans in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Victor Hernandez; Jordi Saez; Marlies Pasler; Diego Jurado-Bruggeman; Nuria Jornet
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-22

5.  Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-only rectum radiotherapy with a commercial synthetic computed tomography generation solution.

Authors:  Matteo Maspero; Marcus D Tyyger; Rob H N Tijssen; Peter R Seevinck; Martijn P W Intven; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-02

Review 6.  Education and training of clinical oncologists-experience from a low-resource setting in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Ntokozo Ndlovu; Sandra Ndarukwa; Albert Nyamhunga; Patience Musiwa-Mba; Anna Mary Nyakabau; Webster Kadzatsa; Melinda Mushonga
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-03-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.