Literature DB >> 27845915

Automatic metastatic brain tumor segmentation for stereotactic radiosurgery applications.

Yan Liu1, Strahinja Stojadinovic, Brian Hrycushko, Zabi Wardak, Weiguo Lu, Yulong Yan, Steve B Jiang, Robert Timmerman, Ramzi Abdulrahman, Lucien Nedzi, Xuejun Gu.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop an automatic segmentation strategy for efficient and accurate metastatic brain tumor delineation on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) magnetic resonance images (MRI) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications. The proposed four-step automatic brain metastases segmentation strategy is comprised of pre-processing, initial contouring, contour evolution, and contour triage. First, T1c brain images are preprocessed to remove the skull. Second, an initial tumor contour is created using a multi-scaled adaptive threshold-based bounding box and a super-voxel clustering technique. Third, the initial contours are evolved to the tumor boundary using a regional active contour technique. Fourth, all detected false-positive contours are removed with geometric characterization. The segmentation process was validated on a realistic virtual phantom containing Gaussian or Rician noise. For each type of noise distribution, five different noise levels were tested. Twenty-one cases from the multimodal brain tumor image segmentation (BRATS) challenge dataset and fifteen clinical metastases cases were also included in validation. Segmentation performance was quantified by the Dice coefficient (DC), normalized mutual information (NMI), structural similarity (SSIM), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean value of surface-to-surface distance (MSSD) and standard deviation of surface-to-surface distance (SDSSD). In the numerical phantom study, the evaluation yielded a DC of 0.98  ±  0.01, an NMI of 0.97  ±  0.01, an SSIM of 0.999  ±  0.001, an HD of 2.2  ±  0.8 mm, an MSSD of 0.1  ±  0.1 mm, and an SDSSD of 0.3  ±  0.1 mm. The validation on the BRATS data resulted in a DC of 0.89  ±  0.08, which outperform the BRATS challenge algorithms. Evaluation on clinical datasets gave a DC of 0.86  ±  0.09, an NMI of 0.80  ±  0.11, an SSIM of 0.999  ±  0.001, an HD of 8.8  ±  12.6 mm, an MSSD of 1.5  ±  3.2 mm, and an SDSSD of 1.8  ±  3.4 mm when comparing to the physician drawn ground truth. The result indicated that the developed automatic segmentation strategy yielded accurate brain tumor delineation and presented as a useful clinical tool for SRS applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27845915     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/24/8440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of morphological characteristics of IDH-mutant/wildtype brain tumors using whole-lesion phenotype analysis.

Authors:  James M Snyder; Raymond Y Huang; Harrison Bai; Vikram R Rao; Susannah Cornes; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; David Gutman; Rebecca Fasano; Erwin G Van Meir; Daniel Brat; Jennifer Eschbacher; John Quackenbush; Patrick Y Wen; Jong Woo Lee
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-06-24

2.  Deep learning enables automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multisequence MRI.

Authors:  Endre Grøvik; Darvin Yi; Michael Iv; Elizabeth Tong; Daniel Rubin; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  A web-based brain metastases segmentation and labeling platform for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Zi Yang; Hui Liu; Yan Liu; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Robert Timmerman; Lucien Nedzi; Tu Dan; Zabi Wardak; Weiguo Lu; Xuejun Gu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Marion Smits
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Segmentation of Organs and Tumor within Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Using K-Nearest Neighbor Classification.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; Rui Zhang
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 6.  Advanced Imaging of Brain Metastases: From Augmenting Visualization and Improving Diagnosis to Evaluating Treatment Response.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tong; Kassie Lyn McCullagh; Michael Iv
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review.

Authors:  Emilia Gryska; Justin Schneiderman; Isabella Björkman-Burtscher; Rolf A Heckemann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Automated brain tumor identification using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar Kouli; Ahmed Hassane; Dania Badran; Tasnim Kouli; Kismet Hossain-Ibrahim; J Douglas Steele
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-05-27

9.  A deep convolutional neural network-based automatic delineation strategy for multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Brian Hrycushko; Zabi Wardak; Steven Lau; Weiguo Lu; Yulong Yan; Steve B Jiang; Xin Zhen; Robert Timmerman; Lucien Nedzi; Xuejun Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.