Literature DB >> 27845870

Differences in Health Care Use and Costs Among Patients With Cancer Receiving Intravenous Chemotherapy in Physician Offices Versus in Hospital Outpatient Settings.

Maxine D Fisher1, Rajeshwari Punekar1, Yeun Mi Yim1, Arthur Small1, Joseph R Singer1, Jay Schukman1, Barbara L McAneny1, Rakesh Luthra1, Jennifer Malin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current shift in site of care from community oncology practices to the hospital outpatient department to deliver oncology services may have significant implications for the economic and clinical outcomes of cancer care. Therefore, this study compares health care use and costs among patients with cancer receiving intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in physician offices (PO) versus in hospital outpatient settings (HOP).
METHODS: This retrospective study, which was based on medical and pharmacy claims data, included patients (age, 18 to 64 years) initiating IV chemotherapy/biologic treatment between January 1, 2006, and August 31, 2012, who were diagnosed with early or metastatic breast cancer, metastatic lung cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients were assigned to PO or HOP groups on the basis of where they received > 95% of their IV cancer therapy.
RESULTS: The study sample included 18,740 patients (12,899 PO; 5,841 HOP) who had a mean age of 51.6 years and a Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 5.37. Overall office visits (21.8 ± 13.8 PO v 21.2 ± 12.9, P < .005) and outpatient services (50.8 ± 35.5 PO v 48.5 ± 33.6, P < .001) were higher in the PO group than in the HOP group. Cancer-related inpatient hospitalizations (0.6 ± 1.2 PO v 0.7 ± 1.4 HOP, P = .002) were lower in the PO group than in the HOP group. Although quality-of-care metrics were similar between the HOP and PO groups, follow-up all-cause costs ($82,773 PO v $122,473 HOP) and cancer-related health care costs ($69,037 PO v $108,177 HOP) were higher in the HOP group than in the PO group.
CONCLUSION: Despite similar resource use, all-cause and cancer-related health care costs in HOP were significantly higher compared with those in PO settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27845870     DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2016.012930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  8 in total

1.  Practice Patterns for Older Adult Patients With Advanced Cancer: Physician Office Versus Hospital Outpatient Setting.

Authors:  Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Coral L Atoria; Stephen M Schleicher; Peter B Bach; Katherine S Panageas
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Cancer care spending and use by site of provider-administered chemotherapy in Medicare.

Authors:  Andrew Shooshtari; Yamini Kalidindi; Jeah Jung
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Implications for cost and access of site-of-service referrals for ancillary medical services in a US Medicaid population: analysis of claims data from Maryland, USA.

Authors:  Simrita Singh; Kelsey J Rydland; Chester Chambers; Vishal Mundlye; Edward Kumian; Kayode Ayodele Williams; Maqbool Dada
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  How is the COVID-19 pandemic shaping transportation access to health care?

Authors:  Katherine L Chen; Madeline Brozen; Jeffrey E Rollman; Tayler Ward; Keith C Norris; Kimberly D Gregory; Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect       Date:  2021-03-12

5.  Are healthcare professionals being left in the lurch? The role of structural barriers and information resources to promote physical activity to cancer patients.

Authors:  Alexander Haussmann; Nadine Ungar; Martina Gabrian; Angeliki Tsiouris; Monika Sieverding; Joachim Wiskemann; Karen Steindorf
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Site-based payment differentials for ambulatory services among individuals with commercial insurance.

Authors:  Aditi P Sen; Yashaswini Singh; Gerard F Anderson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.734

7.  Methodological approaches to measuring the incidence of unplanned emergency department presentations by cancer patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  P H Dufton; M F Gerdtz; R Jarden; M Krishnasamy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Impact of Hospice on Spending and Utilization Among Patients With Lung Cancer in Medicare.

Authors:  Yamini Kalidindi; Joel Segel; Jeah Jung
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 2.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.