| Literature DB >> 27844309 |
Rasheed Zakaria1,2, Andreas Pomschar3, Michael D Jenkinson4,5, Jörg-Christian Tonn6, Claus Belka7,8,9, Birgit Ertl-Wagner3, Maximilian Niyazi7,8,9.
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective and well tolerated treatment for selected brain metastases; however, local recurrence still occurs. We investigated the use of diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) as an adjunct for SRS treatment planning in brain metastases. Seventeen consecutive patients undergoing complete surgical resection of a solitary brain metastasis underwent image analysis retrospectively. SRS treatment plans were generated based on standard 3D post-contrast T1-weighted sequences at 1.5T and then separately using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in a blinded fashion. Control scans immediately post operation confirmed complete tumour resection. Treatment plans were compared to one another and with volume of local recurrence at progression quantitatively and qualitatively by calculating the conformity index (CI), the overlapping volume as a proportion of the total combined volume, where 1 = identical plans and 0 = no conformation whatsoever. Gross tumour volumes (GTVs) using ADC and post-contrast T1-weighted sequences were quantitatively the same (related samples Wilcoxon signed rank test = -0.45, p = 0.653) but showed differing conformations (CI 0.53, p < 0.001). The diffusion treatment volume (DTV) obtained by combining the two target volumes was significantly greater than the treatment volume based on post contrast T1-weighted MRI alone, both quantitatively (median 13.65 vs. 9.52 cm3, related samples Wilcoxon signed rank test p < 0.001) and qualitatively (CI 0.74, p = 0.001). This DTV covered a greater volume of subsequent tumour recurrence than the standard plan (median 3.53 cm3 vs. 3.84 cm3, p = 0.002). ADC maps may be a useful tool in addition to the standard post-contrast T1-weighted sequence used for SRS planning.Entities:
Keywords: ADC; Brain metastasis; DWI; Planning study; Stereotactic radiosurgery
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27844309 PMCID: PMC5350211 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2320-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurooncol ISSN: 0167-594X Impact factor: 4.130
Demographic and clinical information of the included patients
| ID | Age (years) | Sex | Performance status (KPS) (%) | GPA category | Primary cancer | Extracranial metastases | Status of primary tumour | Location of brain metastasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M011 | 38 | F | 100 | 3.0 | Melanoma (BRAF+) | Present | Stable disease | Occipital |
| M013 | 48 | F | 90 | 3.5–4.0 | NSCLC | Absent | Stable disease | Frontal |
| M019 | 70 | F | 90 | 1.5–2.5 | Lung NOS | Present | Synchronous | Cerebellar |
| M028 | 57 | F | 70 | 1.5–2.5 | Melanoma | Present | Synchronous | Parietal |
| M031 | 70 | M | 90 | 3.0 | NSCLC | Absent | Stable disease | Occipital |
| M033 | 36 | F | 100 | 3.5–4.0 | NSCLC | Absent | Synchronous | Temporal |
| M042 | 60 | F | 70 | 1.5–2.5 | Unknown | Present | Synchronous | Frontal |
| M052 | 48 | F | 90 | 3.0 | Breast (HER2−) | Present | Stable disease | Parietal |
| M222 | 56 | F | 90 | 3.5–4.0 | NSCLC | Absent | Stable disease | Frontal |
| M302 | 35 | F | 90 | 3.0 | Melanoma (BRAF+) | Present | Stable disease | Parietal |
| M008 | 54 | F | 80 | 3.0 | NSCLC | Absent | Synchronous | Frontal |
| M257 | 68 | M | 90 | 3.0 | NSCLC | Absent | Synchronous | Parietal |
| M260 | 67 | M | 90 | 3.0 | NSCLC | Absent | Synchronous | Occipital |
| M268 | 51 | M | 90 | 3.5–4.0 | NSCLC | Absent | Stable disease | Frontal |
| M308 | 56 | F | 90 | 3.5–4.0 | Breast (HER2+) | Absent | Stable disease | Frontal |
| M135 | 27 | F | 90 | 3.5–4.0 | Breast (HER2−) | Absent | Stable disease | Parietal |
| M164 | 53 | F | 100 | 1.5–2.5 | NSCLC | Present | Synchronous | Frontal |
Fig. 1Illustration of the conformity index (=intersection volume ÷ conjunction volume) for comparing treatment volumes based on the T1gad and the ADC studies
Average metastasis volume as assessed using the standard post-contrast planning sequence (T1gad) and the ADC map
| Case ID | GTVT1gad | GTVADC | DTV (union of GTVT1gad and GTVADC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| M011 | 18.5 | 29.81 | 30.46 |
| M013 | 10.2 | 12.57 | 13.65 |
| M019 | 38.99 | 27.88 | 44.82 |
| M028 | 12.33 | 9.4 | 14.23 |
| M031 | 49.48 | 42.35 | 55.36 |
| M033 | 16.03 | 10.07 | 16.89 |
| M042 | 71.71 | 64.51 | 77.21 |
| M052 | 4.33 | 4.27 | 5.77 |
| M222 | 7.27 | 6.8 | 9.31 |
| M302 | 14.18 | 18.58 | 19.87 |
| M008 | 2.35 | 1.5 | 2.37 |
| M257 | 4.41 | 5.48 | 6.70 |
| M260 | 0.75 | 0.49 | 0.84 |
| M268 | 4.85 | 7.56 | 8.18 |
| M308 | 9.52 | 7.05 | 12.45 |
| M135 | 8.74 | 15.06 | 16.35 |
| M164 | 1.19 | 1.74 | 2.24 |
| Median | 9.52 | 9.40 | 13.65 |
Volumes are in cm3
Fig. 2An occipital metastasis in a patient with metastatic melanoma (M-011). Treatment plans were generated based on a the ADC map—GTVADC and b the post-contrast T1-weighted planning study—GTVT1gad. The combined plan with addition of these two volumes is termed the diffusion treatment volume or DTV (c). These volumes are superimposed on post-contrast T1-weighted sequences acquired at the point when the resected tumour recurred. The volume of local recurrence that was covered by the GTVT1gad (d) was less than that covered by the DTV (e) and differed in conformation