| Literature DB >> 27844014 |
Majidreza Khos Hkholgh1, Sajad Nazari2.
Abstract
The genetic variation and population structure of narrow-clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) was examined by means of polymerase chain reaction (PC R) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RF LP) analysis of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) of mitochondrial DNA. A total of 194 adult specimens were collected from seven sample sites including, two in the south Caspian Sea and one each in Anzali wetland and Aras reservoir and three rivers Chafrood, Masule Rudkhan and S iah Darvishan. The PCR products were digested with 19 restriction enzymes and five enzymes revealed polymorphism patterns (DdeІ, MboІ, TaqI, RsaІ and HinfІ). Twenty eight composite haplotypes were showed with the number of haplotypes in each population sample ranging from 8 to 13. Private haplotypes were found at very low frequencies. Two regional (S iah Darvishan River and Astara) groups were clearly recognized by cluster and molecular variance model (AMOVA) analyses (P<0.0001). Each of these groups revealed dominant haplotypes while these haplotypes play less important rule in population structures of the other geographic areas. Intrapop ulatio n hap lo type (h) and nucleotide (π) diversities were high for each locality, ranging h=0.7560±0.030 and π=0.00334±0.00301, respectively. Results of this study discerned two divergent populations of narrow-clawed crayfish including S iah Darvishan River and Astara. Thus, the population structure of the narrow-clawed crayfish, as inferred from mtDN A analysis, is constituted by genetica lly separate groups that nearly reflect their geographic distribution.Entities:
Keywords: Astacus leptodactylus; Genetic diversity; Mitochondrial DN A; PC R-RFLP
Year: 2015 PMID: 27844014 PMCID: PMC5019214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Res Commun ISSN: 2322-181X
Sa mpling localit ies , numbers , and nu mber of indiv iduals s ampled (n)
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | Astara | 34 |
| 2 | Kiashahr | 31 | |
|
| Central p art | 27 | |
|
| 4 | Chafrood | 28 |
| 5 | M asuleh | 14 | |
| 6 | Siah d arvishan | 23 | |
|
| 7 | Aras | 37 |
|
| 194 |
Figure1Sa mp ling s ites of the narrow-c lawed crayfis h, A. leptodactylus. The localities are labeled with numbers . Detailed informat ion about the s ites can be found in Table 1
Nucleotide divers ity (π) and haplotype divers ity (h) values and geographic dis tribution of A. leptodactylus mtDNA RFLP co mpos ite haplotypes derived in this s tudy
| Ast ara | Kiashahr | Anzali | Chafrood | Masuleh | Siah darvishan | Aras | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0035 | 0.0012 | 0.0017 | 0.0046 | 0.0032 | 0.0054 | 0.0036 | |
|
| 0.762 | 0.687 | 0.718 | 0.816 | 0.782 | 0.829 | 0.702 | |
| No. | Haplotypes | 5 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 2 | AABAA | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 3 | ABAAB | 2 | 4 | 2 | - | 1 | - | 4 |
| 4 | ABCAB | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | 9 | 1 |
| 5 | AABBC | 13 | 3 | 1 | - | 3 | - | 1 |
| 6 | ACBAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
| 7 | BBBAC | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | BABCA | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | - | - |
| 9 | ACABD | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| 10 | ACCAA | 3 | 4 | - | 1 | - | - | - |
| 11 | BACBC | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | BACAC | - | - | - | 2 | - | 1 | - |
| 13 | ABBCD | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - |
| 14 | ABAAD | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| 15 | ACACC | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - |
| 16 | ABCAB | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| 17 | AACBD | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - |
| 18 | ABABB | - | 3 | 3 | 1 | - | - | 8 |
| 19 | ABCAA | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - |
| 20 | BAABA | 3 | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | - |
| 21 | BBACD | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
| 22 | BBBAC | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - |
| 23 | BAABD | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| 24 | BAABC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | - | - | - |
| 25 | BACBC | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - |
| 26 | BACCB | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
| 27 | CCAAB | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - |
Note: Haplotypes are compos ite s cores for frag ment patterns produced by diges tion with RsaІ, HinfІ,DdeІ, MboІ and TaqI, res pectively. Nu mbers in parenthes es indicate numbers of individuals .
Pairwis e es timates of mt DNA d ivergence (% of nucleotide s ubs titutions ) in A. leptodactylus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.00614 | - | ||||
|
| 0.00851 | 0.00149 | - | |||
|
| 0.00615 | 0.00317 | 0.00268 | - | ||
|
| 0.00178 | 0.00933 | 0.00832 | 0.00384 | - | |
|
| 0.01853 | 0.01624 | 0.00856 | 0.00981 | 0.01608 | - |
|
| 0.00727 | 0.00295 | 0.00382 | 0.00498 | 0.00694 | 0.01473 |
Pairwis e comparis on of Monte Carlo bas ed chi-s quare values for A. leptodactylus populations fro m 7 locations (P-values in parenthes es ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 58.32 | - | ||||
|
| 89.66 | 22.12 | - | |||
|
| 74.62 | 28.65 | 19.12 | - | ||
|
| 98.54 | 16.03 | 22.09 | 11.78 | - | |
|
| 116.85 | 96.8 | 83.75 | 69.26 | 52.43 | - |
|
| 49.17 | 31.14 | 11.8 | 36.9 | 18.4 | 87.00 |
Figure 2An UPGMA tree of the population genetic dis tances for the mtDNA C OI data fro m A. leptodactylus. Boots trap values are given at each node
Hierarch ic s earch for haplotype differences in A. leptodactylus
| Source of v ariation | df | Percentage of variation | Fixation ind ices |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among group s | 2 | 38.79 | FR SCR =0.0228 | <0.001 |
| Among p op ulations within group s | 4 | 4.36 | FR CTR =0.0017 | 0.143 |
| Among hap lotyp e within p op ulation | 188 | 56.85 | FR STR =0.0332 | <0.001 |
| Total | 194 |